From patchwork Sat Nov 30 02:45:18 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Miaohe Lin X-Patchwork-Id: 11267823 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAE7109A for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33D5217BC for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 02:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727198AbfK3Cp3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:45:29 -0500 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:50510 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727177AbfK3Cp2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:45:28 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 96812B9628629FE8062D; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 10:45:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.105.18) by DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 10:45:17 +0800 From: linmiaohe To: , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v3] KVM: vgic: Use wrapper function to lock/unlock all vcpus in kvm_vgic_create() Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 10:45:18 +0800 Message-ID: <1575081918-11401-1-git-send-email-linmiaohe@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.105.18] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org From: Miaohe Lin Use wrapper function lock_all_vcpus()/unlock_all_vcpus() in kvm_vgic_create() to remove duplicated code dealing with locking and unlocking all vcpus in a vm. Reviewed-by: Eric Auger Reviewed-by: Steven Price Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin --- -v2: Fix some spelling mistake in patch title and commit log. -v3: Remove the comment that no longer makes sense. --- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 19 ++++--------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c index b3c5de48064c..22ff73ecac80 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void kvm_vgic_early_init(struct kvm *kvm) */ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type) { - int i, vcpu_lock_idx = -1, ret; + int i, ret; struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; if (irqchip_in_kernel(kvm)) @@ -86,17 +86,9 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type) !kvm_vgic_global_state.can_emulate_gicv2) return -ENODEV; - /* - * Any time a vcpu is run, vcpu_load is called which tries to grab the - * vcpu->mutex. By grabbing the vcpu->mutex of all VCPUs we ensure - * that no other VCPUs are run while we create the vgic. - */ ret = -EBUSY; - kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) { - if (!mutex_trylock(&vcpu->mutex)) - goto out_unlock; - vcpu_lock_idx = i; - } + if (!lock_all_vcpus(kvm)) + return ret; kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) { if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once) @@ -125,10 +117,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.vgic.rd_regions); out_unlock: - for (; vcpu_lock_idx >= 0; vcpu_lock_idx--) { - vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_lock_idx); - mutex_unlock(&vcpu->mutex); - } + unlock_all_vcpus(kvm); return ret; }