From patchwork Wed Apr 29 11:01:54 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Cristian Ciocaltea X-Patchwork-Id: 11516697 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9625E913 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75268208FE for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="SQ01navy"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="CekuV0J8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 75268208FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To :From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=Tyu80ExEfw2SSrVmO7A/WF3K/0d2UPjIdowhVMQ+zTY=; b=SQ01navyOx9mUI 5qXWyucHGOcnQBXvpAjSb0CLHbrYaEmoH/sqVo5yVozMmK0fhwBzQgs+Nl1khiWUWK3f7rsPJKazS NlXAeDzwWMH0eplfQ/I6FYK1keKdXktp0hGBbJvzVcHINurm+Ht98rPu5q28ncPa2H1KAo8OMj73v Bi9DYDHodx3iSdF9r3n3LAgyOWdp7cCKCkZKr67wa99R8A/3ANU1qJpu5QuPhRSooCiRxEhP7HPd3 VCCPnY7RT+FfNCbQO8sAShmRXXjGN41wQ8spDCmrljTWOqPyMzLCOzRh1Dl5LZq7qBRQbWfAVyqCr J8YHUaQo21gCDz1IVvxg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jTkTZ-0006hr-17; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:02:01 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::342]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jTkTW-0006gu-8w; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:01:59 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id e26so1524460wmk.5; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 04:01:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nuf8dwcrjX3dNT8pb1qPoIHBU9UzXx/Q2WQpqmKN7MM=; b=CekuV0J8SOjnr1sBAQ1Kk04qxrk1dBsmfUWYQnh2DDFeJoTaDUGViG2RIuId7BIDPe XAK/kkfJlabmfZSkX/aizsmqpWeVqhkY0v9IDhhXUEzak+/LG7qeYx3EDS7OtLJ/ui02 rEED4HcY82oWEUuwAafPJTWsVr/tGaR5Bi8zV5X9sK3YL9mMKF5aeP/AozGA3AZff/ql uPLG1JqepjJBAWMVTqoCpKqVtJ6wwlKqMxBwPdIlmUSPBixAXQ8R9n5uHo4ytoLjjRnL wZOPq+XM0d9PN9nbIYqx3K3SrX5cZzQDk1goDPKSuMIaarH9D3BuOdNEc7TyJgw4egkU GD0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Nuf8dwcrjX3dNT8pb1qPoIHBU9UzXx/Q2WQpqmKN7MM=; b=F08DT5JShFwHMubn2526iC6eDPloBpVyOtmoVn3gMJ27TRxo1K2x8oZyOOBx+bJ6cq 5VR0XFWuAOlYMoYa6fpUzi/Br0ILy0tHeGSIdPAYVaDp1ymncMasldz4YL6EMj4wF6xi n2RaPKz3QPuvmZmK4J/QXPek5z3atoS9VDxETYLxhQh7vRfrEqn3B8zeetiJ1kErkzno T+UYIpOaR8dVWQj1n744350MvOIQ/61k7HchLoTJprCHOYJsbgfrAn7Mz/dRj4nIiMAz Dd5Nk8UTdhdMnugcXhdcJGDlQEk0jxm40pbGXLtURu7vVG0bfeW4F3VA/KX4wL94gbkD hQrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZCNWTM9x8oen1t0dEGhs/pPwcu3jFjV9HhhIfAeU3HiIoTSLIn 933jeo4IWC9iZyZjRt+3fds= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKZIgGaeRSn1GVJlz0TSvMRo05dmppm5CI0NwQeQqOmRf6pYn7lHEQT8aCIzeE1xLleAYmW9A== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6344:: with SMTP id x65mr2661658wmb.56.1588158116628; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 04:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([188.24.130.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i4sm15334969wrp.79.2020.04.29.04.01.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 29 Apr 2020 04:01:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Cristian Ciocaltea To: Manivannan Sadhasivam , =?utf-8?q?Andr?= =?utf-8?q?eas_F=C3=A4rber?= Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] dma: actions: Fix lockdep splat for owl-dma Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:01:54 +0300 Message-Id: <1d77970a82cf9b7cdf9f4731439b1e58c37ca3fb.1588156137.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200429_040158_337229_EBD85200 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.30 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:342 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider [cristian.ciocaltea[at]gmail.com] 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org When the kernel is built with lockdep support and the owl-dma driver is used, the following message is shown: [ 2.496939] INFO: trying to register non-static key. [ 2.501889] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. [ 2.507357] turning off the locking correctness validator. [ 2.512834] CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.6.3+ #15 [ 2.519084] Hardware name: Generic DT based system [ 2.523878] Workqueue: events_freezable mmc_rescan [ 2.528681] [<801127f0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010da58>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 2.536420] [<8010da58>] (show_stack) from [<8080fbe8>] (dump_stack+0xb4/0xe0) [ 2.543645] [<8080fbe8>] (dump_stack) from [<8017efa4>] (register_lock_class+0x6f0/0x718) [ 2.551816] [<8017efa4>] (register_lock_class) from [<8017b7d0>] (__lock_acquire+0x78/0x25f0) [ 2.560330] [<8017b7d0>] (__lock_acquire) from [<8017e5e4>] (lock_acquire+0xd8/0x1f4) [ 2.568159] [<8017e5e4>] (lock_acquire) from [<80831fb0>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3c/0x50) [ 2.576589] [<80831fb0>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<8051b5fc>] (owl_dma_issue_pending+0xbc/0x120) [ 2.585884] [<8051b5fc>] (owl_dma_issue_pending) from [<80668cbc>] (owl_mmc_request+0x1b0/0x390) [ 2.594655] [<80668cbc>] (owl_mmc_request) from [<80650ce0>] (mmc_start_request+0x94/0xbc) [ 2.602906] [<80650ce0>] (mmc_start_request) from [<80650ec0>] (mmc_wait_for_req+0x64/0xd0) [ 2.611245] [<80650ec0>] (mmc_wait_for_req) from [<8065aa10>] (mmc_app_send_scr+0x10c/0x144) [ 2.619669] [<8065aa10>] (mmc_app_send_scr) from [<80659b3c>] (mmc_sd_setup_card+0x4c/0x318) [ 2.628092] [<80659b3c>] (mmc_sd_setup_card) from [<80659f0c>] (mmc_sd_init_card+0x104/0x430) [ 2.636601] [<80659f0c>] (mmc_sd_init_card) from [<8065a3e0>] (mmc_attach_sd+0xcc/0x16c) [ 2.644678] [<8065a3e0>] (mmc_attach_sd) from [<8065301c>] (mmc_rescan+0x3ac/0x40c) [ 2.652332] [<8065301c>] (mmc_rescan) from [<80143244>] (process_one_work+0x2d8/0x780) [ 2.660239] [<80143244>] (process_one_work) from [<80143730>] (worker_thread+0x44/0x598) [ 2.668323] [<80143730>] (worker_thread) from [<8014b5f8>] (kthread+0x148/0x150) [ 2.675708] [<8014b5f8>] (kthread) from [<801010b4>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x20) [ 2.682912] Exception stack(0xee8fdfb0 to 0xee8fdff8) [ 2.687954] dfa0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.696118] dfc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 [ 2.704277] dfe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000 The obvious fix would be to use 'spin_lock_init()' on 'pchan->lock' before attempting to call 'spin_lock_irqsave()' in 'owl_dma_get_pchan()'. However, according to Manivannan Sadhasivam, 'pchan->lock' was supposed to only protect 'pchan->vchan' while 'od->lock' does a similar job in 'owl_dma_terminate_pchan'. Therefore, this patch will simply substitute 'pchan->lock' with 'od->lock' and removes the 'lock' attribute in 'owl_dma_pchan' struct. Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam --- Changes in v2: * Improve the fix as suggested by Manivannan Sadhasivam: substitute 'pchan->lock' with 'od->lock' and get rid of the 'lock' attribute in 'owl_dma_pchan' struct * Update the commit message to reflect the changes drivers/dma/owl-dma.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c b/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c index c683051257fd..5b1c715a56c8 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c @@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ struct owl_dma_pchan { u32 id; void __iomem *base; struct owl_dma_vchan *vchan; - spinlock_t lock; }; /** @@ -437,14 +436,14 @@ static struct owl_dma_pchan *owl_dma_get_pchan(struct owl_dma *od, for (i = 0; i < od->nr_pchans; i++) { pchan = &od->pchans[i]; - spin_lock_irqsave(&pchan->lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&od->lock, flags); if (!pchan->vchan) { pchan->vchan = vchan; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pchan->lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&od->lock, flags); break; } - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pchan->lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&od->lock, flags); } return pchan;