From patchwork Thu May 7 19:19:32 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" X-Patchwork-Id: 11534769 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA51D1392 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30FB208E4 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:15:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588878912; bh=G6KMEamY18fl3fWqdUXZEPHjZzA7lN73yyBEGPKoCPg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:From; b=jWtVo8cw2EtohqbTKsNx0E0LA0Y/ne03j1VS6mGrVrx9Q7M/6kzGN7Plh84R7XT8f ahW8fFL4RVnXwiYZ1PLiE09guHi6qtLMBgC9wtN6gIf5y1esWBXrAO4Gmk7Xfb5gWI hYkk9yrWf3Cl7PyRuuKsuvHje8DE36GzszhALU4w= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728526AbgEGTPH (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 15:15:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38614 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726320AbgEGTPG (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 15:15:06 -0400 Received: from embeddedor (unknown [189.207.59.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6B74208D6; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:15:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1588878906; bh=G6KMEamY18fl3fWqdUXZEPHjZzA7lN73yyBEGPKoCPg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=eF6nDo0Kauty1qyvRId7Y4Z4Y2qmkPQHPx6M4S3vF4q3FklYUyhJg/jAkPzXchXkN wCMK7Ltw8VN3iGt5jOrO0pEllR9K0gqoANqIlUL1PeWjHqYoew1Fy/fPm0cjRdOPVT w2cIloaxI+FsLyj6daG9Ohzu5Q/IyP5K2y/lKHzY= Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 14:19:32 -0500 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" To: Ilya Dryomov , Sage Weil Cc: Dongsheng Yang , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] rbd: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Message-ID: <20200507191932.GA15991@embeddedor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- drivers/block/rbd_types.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd_types.h b/drivers/block/rbd_types.h index ac98ab6ccd3b..a600e0eb6b6f 100644 --- a/drivers/block/rbd_types.h +++ b/drivers/block/rbd_types.h @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct rbd_image_header_ondisk { __le32 snap_count; __le32 reserved; __le64 snap_names_len; - struct rbd_image_snap_ondisk snaps[0]; + struct rbd_image_snap_ondisk snaps[]; } __attribute__((packed));