From patchwork Fri Jun 12 22:49:09 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11602335 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571E7912 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3484C2078E for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="VIgE9m2f"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="IZ+OBQjC" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3484C2078E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=xAucmDskfujOlLawlhVVDX6HPnQWsy5wiSNy4nk72Hk=; b=VIgE9m2f9CIkbo cBBZbTLSuQsC9hR6VBtwFbnp15zM7L+7rvz8udwAptS5dW2FFJ38kj9xcYNA8pTUFK2ZiHymRM59o bE5S5GpUNA94S4gn4kftkLnmyN0CQMB28flBPsEP5ysLZCu12sWzqv4TH2OUQra5C/m1cF/88dsPp wkmFJKeq/OASxqHUhjG4l1iviZlSD8078LM/JQ21VGI56qBpLJ17UOWOmo3jJHsbsmC3vWccevzbq +Esmf06JMAbWP8IE92AXHkCSkC75CUFHz0IfMNIejiugacF5HkIc2DVvoxe71B4Pi0jE9toPUflHo CJ6HwjILuedjt6YYf/6w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsVM-0004ff-B6; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:50:32 +0000 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsUP-0001bp-6J for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:49:35 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnR5N108675; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1592002167; bh=8Gnvm0Dx2536XFDw8g4fMAwYldxTRJioYlmw6qTiNyU=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=IZ+OBQjCYEQlRXwwwuQeubiFpoK6lIjs1zyRreTcB9G0cOCphVhz/b7qNHvgboo2b i41YmpBI1L6bzM7Jz+3PFuNyo35QoSLjRdbfj0+O/wQllpuptzOCVggK9v36ZQsbRM rI6yKV8H6xVa6qlSIHS2EOnQKUrR3c6XVilDeOgg= Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (dlee107.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.37]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05CMnRE2119604 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:27 -0500 Received: from DLEE106.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.36) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:26 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE106.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:26 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnRbR071954; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:27 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.48.148]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 05CMnQLW062163; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:26 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] remoteproc: Introduce rproc_of_parse_firmware() helper Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20200612224914.7634-2-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200612_154933_312064_FF6FBB56 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.52 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.23.249 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [198.47.23.249 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Add a new helper function rproc_of_parse_firmware() to the remoteproc core that can be used by various remoteproc drivers to look up the the "firmware-name" property from a rproc device node. This property is already being used by multiple drivers, so this helper can avoid repeating equivalent code in remoteproc drivers. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v3: No changes, picked up review tags v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11561791/ drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index 9f04c30c4aaf..c458b218d524 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1034,6 +1034,29 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init); +/** + * rproc_of_parse_firmware() - parse and return the firmware-name + * @dev: pointer on device struct representing a rproc + * @index: index to use for the firmware-name retrieval + * @fw_name: pointer to a character string, in which the firmware + * name is returned on success and unmodified otherwise. + * + * This is an OF helper function that parses a device's DT node for + * the "firmware-name" property and returns the firmware name pointer + * in @fw_name on success. + * + * Return: 0 on success, or an appropriate failure. + */ +int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, const char **fw_name) +{ + int ret; + + ret = of_property_read_string_index(dev->of_node, "firmware-name", + index, fw_name); + return ret ? ret : 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_parse_firmware); + /* * A lookup table for resource handlers. The indices are defined in * enum fw_resource_type. diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h index 4ba7cb59d3e8..e5341e91d2fc 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace { void rproc_release(struct kref *kref); irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id); void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref); +int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, + const char **fw_name); /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */ int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id); From patchwork Fri Jun 12 22:49:10 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11602337 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE2A912 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7381207DD for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="WFpQI9Eg"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Z0J5WdW3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B7381207DD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=e/vUGQxH9cC/RaDyD70PlTZ0TN+xya5IvwKCbabpNdk=; b=WFpQI9EgzKRemf pt37WECf45XSIBpCTI1vP6sMVLloZZ6k+LlxVzis17kJbcfMIrTf2BB1lESWNs9y82DC+T7QK1IBG I/G+7dt3ackUnNvukaUi3DX0dOOdp6ZFM3oWmqK9zPxcCXfRHK6wpV0VvaOXSZt8lZXCbx83LMMhu F+HvQ46N+0LW96N2IwEjRu46iU49x7uCDpZEQhYhSFTvmQaMR3y/+cQL6wrBiIib2lHZMHcesHWbY gDL3oEhvhHMsHKfKvLp8aStwi8AAmn6vS2qDdrskkrlbKejlgiLD542MYTvHV5QqEy8QgYf3hH9XC kwYKAMIHjbA87PFQ57Hw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsVZ-0004w7-3H; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:50:45 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsUO-0001bn-SI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:49:35 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnT39103481; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1592002169; bh=GP4LvDpiiVb2/sG8nBRXMGkNlpoMDKmbI3o4CyswfyQ=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Z0J5WdW3C4QYbSEilG73sOj0fwHpVWVXR7q5t9wRMEzqU7mC1GIWFrEWEX7mqT2Hp GgAIIk/XlUmpta5gICaCajK1+hRYLKQG80SD03PluA6hyDMMEXzuD3hg/D6oNMR6R5 eFPgur8/L6YCGBzAgrzztqJZShkJU+eHNVFk4CUA= Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (dlee114.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.25]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05CMnTVt058565 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Received: from DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:28 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnSlx089805; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:28 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.48.148]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 05CMnSlF062169; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:28 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] remoteproc: k3: Add TI-SCI processor control helper functions Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20200612224914.7634-3-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200612_154933_004530_9C9EE04A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.67 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Texas Instruments' K3 generation SoCs have specific modules/register spaces used for configuring the various aspects of a remote processor. These include power, reset, boot vector and other configuration features specific to each compute processor present on the SoC. These registers are managed by the System Controller such as DMSC on K3 AM65x SoCs. The Texas Instrument's System Control Interface (TI-SCI) Message Protocol is used to communicate to the System Controller from various compute processors to invoke specific services provided by the firmware running on the System Controller. Add a common processor control interface header file that can be used by multiple remoteproc drivers. The helper functions within this header file abstract the various TI SCI protocol ops for the remoteproc drivers, and allow them to request the System Controller to be able to program and manage various remote processors on the SoC. The remoteproc drivers are expected to manage the life-cycle of their ti_sci_proc_dev local structures. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v3: New to this series, but the patch is identical to the one from the K3 R5F series posted previously, with patch title adjusted https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456379/ drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..e42d8015b8e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_sci_proc.h @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/* + * Texas Instruments TI-SCI Processor Controller Helper Functions + * + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/ + * Suman Anna + */ + +#ifndef REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_PROC_H +#define REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_PROC_H + +/** + * struct ti_sci_proc - structure representing a processor control client + * @sci: cached TI-SCI protocol handle + * @ops: cached TI-SCI proc ops + * @dev: cached client device pointer + * @proc_id: processor id for the consumer remoteproc device + * @host_id: host id to pass the control over for this consumer remoteproc + * device + */ +struct ti_sci_proc { + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci; + const struct ti_sci_proc_ops *ops; + struct device *dev; + u8 proc_id; + u8 host_id; +}; + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_request(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->request(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor request failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_release(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->release(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor release failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_handover(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->handover(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, tsp->host_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor handover of %d to %d failed: %d\n", + tsp->proc_id, tsp->host_id, ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_set_config(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp, + u64 boot_vector, + u32 cfg_set, u32 cfg_clr) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->set_config(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, boot_vector, + cfg_set, cfg_clr); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor set_config failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_set_control(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp, + u32 ctrl_set, u32 ctrl_clr) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->set_control(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, ctrl_set, ctrl_clr); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor set_control failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +static inline int ti_sci_proc_get_status(struct ti_sci_proc *tsp, + u64 *boot_vector, u32 *cfg_flags, + u32 *ctrl_flags, u32 *status_flags) +{ + int ret; + + ret = tsp->ops->get_status(tsp->sci, tsp->proc_id, boot_vector, + cfg_flags, ctrl_flags, status_flags); + if (ret) + dev_err(tsp->dev, "ti-sci processor get_status failed: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; +} + +#endif /* REMOTEPROC_TI_SCI_PROC_H */ From patchwork Fri Jun 12 22:49:11 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11602333 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF512912 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D58E2078A for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="JjAL7VtU"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="JNzY4WDo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9D58E2078A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=2XXJpATBeFH5FjopAyDWdIH7R5dQEqnQViPMcA8vrOA=; b=JjAL7VtUUrlE0H cwThuL1T8a7VA3fj0VtOkCKJZvQA05mPDFvL5UAjIm0gKKq7/T1Ktm9qY6OwIKFuTucTH4+Pv9lFs hWmiwvlCeLM31uZqQCwGXH+CrDQIp3XvSWRUbpotmIlNQDc5997yKUYo3nS2pDyUS0lXXhBCf+dVX cgt9p+RY2rM7lQhyltF20BdBEvh9ELEaaVJ7Nw62qxhBpm1FmPcftlg6kMr9vLlg7QTNkSDg718UG PU65FF3LMyBwzaenhV3bhST2ZwAaAuK7EGMnZzssvA3SFrtIo2974OZp5MrZBreW/s6k39Cq63q0K ihpojCrFGh/kRe/JMVVw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsV5-0003ot-QO; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:50:15 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsUO-0001br-R8 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:49:35 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnUbT121066; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1592002170; bh=bNsry0vaH4LJP2i3TLuNDpE56+9ye4tE5chXV1/nxh0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=JNzY4WDoBVWJQ7w6WsbuN70cg0DpIsHxWcnV9K7+pPicXuCzI6q16PEH3kDgqRt89 oatV8csvpcgUV5N2B3gT2Gtf0pf4/1N7u35AQOTewe9sJToivT0ZJJ6hqo8DA4Dbex YnvhiilXphRrOjjSG05BLshAIix96NxgSGwT3xKo= Received: from DLEE104.ent.ti.com (dlee104.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.34]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnUiW046039; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:30 -0500 Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) by DLEE104.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnTl2112276; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:29 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.48.148]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 05CMnTMi062177; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:29 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add common TI SCI rproc bindings Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:11 -0500 Message-ID: <20200612224914.7634-4-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200612_154932_959735_27810DF5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.43 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.142 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [198.47.19.142 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Add a bindings document that lists the common TI SCI properties used by the K3 R5F and DSP remoteproc devices. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Rob Herring --- v3: New Patch refactoring out the common ti-sci-proc properties .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml | 51 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..883b6e9b5282 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: Common TI K3 remote processor device bindings + +maintainers: + - Suman Anna + +description: | + The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more remote processor sub-systems + like the dual-core R5F sub-system or a C66x or C71x DSP processor subsystem. + The device management of these remote processors is managed by a dedicated + System Processor, and the communication with that processor is managed through + the TI-SCI protocol. + + Each remote processor device node should define a common set of properties + that allows the System Processor firmware to perform the device management + such as powering the IPs, asserting/deasserting the resets for each of these + processors. + +properties: + ti,sci: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle + description: + Should be a phandle to the TI-SCI System Controller node + + ti,sci-dev-id: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + description: | + Should contain the TI-SCI device id corresponding to the remote processor + core. Please refer to the corresponding System Controller documentation + for valid values. + + ti,sci-proc-ids: + description: Should contain a single tuple of . + allOf: + - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array + - maxItems: 1 + items: + items: + - description: TI-SCI processor id for the remote processor device + - description: TI-SCI host id to which processor control + ownership should be transferred to + +required: + - ti,sci + - ti,sci-dev-id + - ti,sci-proc-ids From patchwork Fri Jun 12 22:49:12 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11602321 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392A390 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC9C2206DC for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="COxom2U6"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="B9tLRvhg" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EC9C2206DC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=spJs7MIG4VmpfAWbbvRDWra3cWus+N2xW0fwge3ToZc=; b=COxom2U6gS6lD4 YSGQxUdSuR71FaqpAn6lb44fE7vRSH/+y4M9yXfwwg8eYbuUyCpS3qfxGRHUu6LLghkqq5YgZMb5j ba3zyaxLeKE4HytWZVe3QS4fJ2ztTrE0MF+g7PWxXcsJs0Mho97O/DGUcli+0GECECpNQhjzStlxz FWcZhGWPBSRwx9JEhokCf+pwgaMiAV+lTXdQOAkM2KbmAWKY5SXHiXjIc3tgTQtEcBitDRw03RrLt 6MeQZDIzIOrX5yyqSzJumn9qeISIB8oqKh1QjkPD0eDzM9Mx6hcpjAosSZwX+f0kTP+qzr0S94Wij 9Q5QZTiWSIeaPVXOjMrQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsUY-0001kE-PH; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:49:42 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsUO-0001bs-HL for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:49:34 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnU3e103490; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1592002170; bh=or5Y94/hVNDzY9xAF8kMc/vLk2IYUaANgfagMRDiMbA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=B9tLRvhgT6QbcRaDeyZRpPInZ4YNbeS+qe44/kLwN4/jD/5B6TjLcazHupWY9eQKT x0epICEZ1CW0iQcykRJyxuoYdbGwxGfkZWqNfmOU+b/9y8cWijQ12c1vIQ+7uYppgD x4BycaY4VbDGdfKDKu/TUwY7pdyDdw6vhHnB5Fwc= Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (dlee109.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.41]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnUQb046046; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:30 -0500 Received: from DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:30 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE112.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:30 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnUMr089837; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:30 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.48.148]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 05CMnUPH062182; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:30 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v3 4/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:12 -0500 Message-ID: <20200612224914.7634-5-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200612_154932_650890_9786063A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.13 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Some Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one of more Digital Signal Processor (DSP) subsystems that are comprised of either a TMS320C66x CorePac and/or a next-generation TMS320C71x CorePac processor subsystem. Add the device tree bindings document for the C66x DSP devices on these SoCs. The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the first C66x DSP device present on the K3 J721E family of SoCs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Rob Herring --- v3: - Refactored the common ti-sci properties "ti,sci", "ti,sci-dev-id" and "ti,sci-proc-ids" into a separate binding ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml. - Dropped the general description and maxItems against reg and reg-names - Added items list under reg - Removed the other binding references from the description for resets and mboxes - Revised the memory-region description and listed the mandatory items - Updated example to drop reserved-memory nodes, unused node labels v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11561781/ .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml | 139 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 139 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f03e88c42a6e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: TI K3 DSP devices + +maintainers: + - Suman Anna + +description: | + The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more TI DSP Core sub-systems + that are used to offload some of the processor-intensive tasks or algorithms, + for achieving various system level goals. + + These processor sub-systems usually contain additional sub-modules like + L1 and/or L2 caches/SRAMs, an Interrupt Controller, an external memory + controller, a dedicated local power/sleep controller etc. The DSP processor + cores in the K3 SoCs are usually either a TMS320C66x CorePac processor or a + TMS320C71x CorePac processor. + + Each DSP Core sub-system is represented as a single DT node. Each node has a + number of required or optional properties that enable the OS running on the + host processor (Arm CorePac) to perform the device management of the remote + processor and to communicate with the remote processor. + +allOf: + - $ref: "ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml#" + +properties: + compatible: + const: ti,j721e-c66-dsp + description: + Use "ti,j721e-c66-dsp" for C66x DSPs on K3 J721E SoCs + + reg: + items: + - description: Address and Size of the L2 SRAM internal memory region + - description: Address and Size of the L1 PRAM internal memory region + - description: Address and Size of the L1 DRAM internal memory region + + reg-names: + items: + - const: l2sram + - const: l1pram + - const: l1dram + + resets: + description: | + Should contain the phandle to the reset controller node managing the + local resets for this device, and a reset specifier. + maxItems: 1 + + firmware-name: + description: | + Should contain the name of the default firmware image + file located on the firmware search path + + mboxes: + description: | + OMAP Mailbox specifier denoting the sub-mailbox, to be used for + communication with the remote processor. This property should match + with the sub-mailbox node used in the firmware image. + maxItems: 1 + + memory-region: + minItems: 2 + maxItems: 8 + description: | + phandle to the reserved memory nodes to be associated with the remoteproc + device. There should be at least two reserved memory nodes defined. The + reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and should be defined as + per the bindings in + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt + items: + - description: region used for dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and + vring buffers + - description: region reserved for firmware image sections + additionalItems: true + +# Optional properties: +# -------------------- + + sram: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array + minItems: 1 + maxItems: 4 + description: | + phandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. The regions + should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and + should be defined as per the generic bindings in, + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml + +required: + - compatible + - reg + - reg-names + - resets + - firmware-name + - mboxes + - memory-region + +unevaluatedProperties: false + +examples: + - | + / { + model = "Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC"; + compatible = "ti,j721e"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + + bus@100000 { + compatible = "simple-bus"; + #address-cells = <2>; + #size-cells = <2>; + ranges = <0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00020000>, /* ctrl mmr */ + <0x4d 0x80800000 0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00800000>, /* C66_0 */ + <0x4d 0x81800000 0x4d 0x81800000 0x00 0x00800000>; /* C66_1 */ + + /* J721E C66_0 DSP node */ + dsp@4d80800000 { + compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp"; + reg = <0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00048000>, + <0x4d 0x80e00000 0x00 0x00008000>, + <0x4d 0x80f00000 0x00 0x00008000>; + reg-names = "l2sram", "l1pram", "l1dram"; + ti,sci = <&dmsc>; + ti,sci-dev-id = <142>; + ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x03 0xFF>; + resets = <&k3_reset 142 1>; + firmware-name = "j7-c66_0-fw"; + memory-region = <&c66_0_dma_memory_region>, + <&c66_0_memory_region>; + mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster3 &mbox_c66_0>; + }; + }; + }; From patchwork Fri Jun 12 22:49:13 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11602341 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B831618 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5115C2078A for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:51:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="GHAfAkmp"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="TPxC9C0q" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5115C2078A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=94FdQbsVTsVc746LjSEM7dQGpPGTpdlMUYjlTV86EJg=; b=GHAfAkmpvj0pLI JduyCSGjK0xQj7qNEBlqxiJBfQH6VIK7gqnV5r+bOC0EJDjd9eRgQdtazIcrI91JLDRZ+DGOy1vla nxOzqEkwQfIgmn48tsNq9BtNpwrqIn3whMJYekCiIhfFtuAsi4CoTQRxb9O8txjE851oV0+tBFqZE SCV583nG7n3y3bEzpRIIjoYuAdC5UEoF1f5fVh/lFJ7i671B8XBt4SJEKh9eN20SRbjjLH6JUlSYU 5u2E9kAc8IOzw3XAKCYnbUNCogZ+uaRbgGU0mxZSqfJ6HIQnu6CY29CjYsYgZfYoBAlbNP5gKjyvz aIEz8puXZ6ZaBTR527pw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsW7-0005SB-2B; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:51:19 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsUP-0001cg-A7 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:49:36 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnV2M103499; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1592002171; bh=hHioYFjIIyxqAc/JFHhgk4dkiE1N0NLZZuqhvdI+1yA=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=TPxC9C0qbwj7k9aq1TdoOQRvniuvZPwTmoGI3qBMMGVGuExc4dm2lalgi38KPqAQN fCHRx9CC7QGVIsl4lo+4xHvjcB5NlAVAA2KfnuGUASczXWFGpKSgXJhI0i13bCKEOz I5FLqTK+Ra6QsuWXvaNhMF1pgaioTe5FMTcBwkNs= Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (dlee105.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.35]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnVAt046069; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:31 -0500 Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:31 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:31 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnVPM072024; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:31 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.48.148]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 05CMnViB062185; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:31 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v3 5/6] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Add a remoteproc driver of K3 C66x DSPs Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:13 -0500 Message-ID: <20200612224914.7634-6-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200612_154933_430653_46A144EE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.78 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The Texas Instrument's K3 J721E SoCs have two C66x DSP Subsystems in MAIN voltage domain that are based on the TI's standard TMS320C66x DSP CorePac module. Each subsystem has a Fixed/Floating-Point DSP CPU, with 32 KB each of L1P & L1D SRAMs that can be configured and partitioned as either RAM and/or Cache, and 288 KB of L2 SRAM with 256 KB of memory configurable as either RAM and/or Cache. The CorePac also includes an Internal DMA (IDMA), External Memory Controller (EMC), Extended Memory Controller (XMC) with a Region Address Translator (RAT) unit for 32-bit to 48-bit address extension/translations, an Interrupt Controller (INTC) and a Powerdown Controller (PDC). A new remoteproc module is added to perform the device management of these DSP devices. The support is limited to images using only external DDR memory at the moment, the loading support to internal memories and any on-chip RAM memories will be added in a subsequent patch. RAT support is also left for a future patch, and as such the reserved memory carveout regions are all expected to be using memory regions within the first 2 GB. Error Recovery and Power Management features are not currently supported. The C66x remote processors do not have an MMU, and so require fixed memory carveout regions matching the firmware image addresses. Support for this is provided by mandating multiple memory regions to be attached to the remoteproc device. The first memory region will be used to serve as the DMA pool for all dynamic allocations like the vrings and vring buffers. The remaining memory regions are mapped into the kernel at device probe time, and are used to provide address translations for firmware image segments without the need for any RSC_CARVEOUT entries. Any firmware image using memory outside of the supplied reserved memory carveout regions will be errored out. The driver uses various TI-SCI interfaces to talk to the System Controller (DMSC) for managing configuration, power and reset management of these cores. IPC between the A72 cores and the DSP cores is supported through the virtio rpmsg stack using shared memory and OMAP Mailboxes. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v3: - Included slab.h to fix compile errors against latest master - Switched from remoteproc/k3-dsp to remoteproc: k3-dsp in patch title - Picked up review tags - No other code changes v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11561783/ drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 13 + drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 702 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 716 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig index c4d1731295eb..74b818b25068 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig @@ -249,6 +249,19 @@ config STM32_RPROC This can be either built-in or a loadable module. +config TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC + tristate "TI K3 DSP remoteproc support" + depends on ARCH_K3 + select MAILBOX + select OMAP2PLUS_MBOX + help + Say m here to support TI's C66x and C71x DSP remote processor + subsystems on various TI K3 family of SoCs through the remote + processor framework. + + It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing + the DSP slave processors. + endif # REMOTEPROC endmenu diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile index e8b886e511f0..d457d0f87ada 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile @@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ qcom_wcnss_pil-y += qcom_wcnss_iris.o obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o +obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..2f8b3ff5427d --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c @@ -0,0 +1,702 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * TI K3 DSP Remote Processor(s) driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/ + * Suman Anna + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "omap_remoteproc.h" +#include "remoteproc_internal.h" +#include "ti_sci_proc.h" + +#define KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK (SZ_16M - 1) + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_mem - internal memory structure + * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region + * @bus_addr: Bus address used to access the memory region + * @dev_addr: Device address of the memory region from DSP view + * @size: Size of the memory region + */ +struct k3_dsp_mem { + void __iomem *cpu_addr; + phys_addr_t bus_addr; + u32 dev_addr; + size_t size; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_mem_data - memory definitions for a DSP + * @name: name for this memory entry + * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry + */ +struct k3_dsp_mem_data { + const char *name; + const u32 dev_addr; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_dev_data - device data structure for a DSP + * @mems: pointer to memory definitions for a DSP + * @num_mems: number of memory regions in @mems + * @boot_align_addr: boot vector address alignment granularity + * @uses_lreset: flag to denote the need for local reset management + */ +struct k3_dsp_dev_data { + const struct k3_dsp_mem_data *mems; + u32 num_mems; + u32 boot_align_addr; + bool uses_lreset; +}; + +/** + * struct k3_dsp_rproc - k3 DSP remote processor driver structure + * @dev: cached device pointer + * @rproc: remoteproc device handle + * @mem: internal memory regions data + * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions + * @rmem: reserved memory regions data + * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions + * @reset: reset control handle + * @data: pointer to DSP-specific device data + * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle + * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel + */ +struct k3_dsp_rproc { + struct device *dev; + struct rproc *rproc; + struct k3_dsp_mem *mem; + int num_mems; + struct k3_dsp_mem *rmem; + int num_rmems; + struct reset_control *reset; + const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data; + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; + const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci; + u32 ti_sci_id; + struct mbox_chan *mbox; + struct mbox_client client; +}; + +/** + * k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback() - inbound mailbox message handler + * @client: mailbox client pointer used for requesting the mailbox channel + * @data: mailbox payload + * + * This handler is invoked by the OMAP mailbox driver whenever a mailbox + * message is received. Usually, the mailbox payload simply contains + * the index of the virtqueue that is kicked by the remote processor, + * and we let remoteproc core handle it. + * + * In addition to virtqueue indices, we also have some out-of-band values + * that indicate different events. Those values are deliberately very + * large so they don't coincide with virtqueue indices. + */ +static void k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = container_of(client, struct k3_dsp_rproc, + client); + struct device *dev = kproc->rproc->dev.parent; + const char *name = kproc->rproc->name; + u32 msg = omap_mbox_message(data); + + dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg); + + switch (msg) { + case RP_MBOX_CRASH: + /* + * remoteproc detected an exception, but error recovery is not + * supported. So, just log this for now + */ + dev_err(dev, "K3 DSP rproc %s crashed\n", name); + break; + case RP_MBOX_ECHO_REPLY: + dev_info(dev, "received echo reply from %s\n", name); + break; + default: + /* silently handle all other valid messages */ + if (msg >= RP_MBOX_READY && msg < RP_MBOX_END_MSG) + return; + if (msg > kproc->rproc->max_notifyid) { + dev_dbg(dev, "dropping unknown message 0x%x", msg); + return; + } + /* msg contains the index of the triggered vring */ + if (rproc_vq_interrupt(kproc->rproc, msg) == IRQ_NONE) + dev_dbg(dev, "no message was found in vqid %d\n", msg); + } +} + +/* + * Kick the remote processor to notify about pending unprocessed messages. + * The vqid usage is not used and is inconsequential, as the kick is performed + * through a simulated GPIO (a bit in an IPC interrupt-triggering register), + * the remote processor is expected to process both its Tx and Rx virtqueues. + */ +static void k3_dsp_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; + mbox_msg_t msg = (mbox_msg_t)vqid; + int ret; + + /* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */ + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)msg); + if (ret < 0) + dev_err(dev, "failed to send mailbox message, status = %d\n", + ret); +} + +/* Put the DSP processor into reset */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = reset_control_assert(kproc->reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "local-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + if (reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset)) + dev_warn(dev, "local-reset deassert back failed\n"); + } + + return ret; +} + +/* Release the DSP processor from reset */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } + + ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id)) + dev_warn(dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n"); + } + + return ret; +} + +/* + * Power up the DSP remote processor. + * + * This function will be invoked only after the firmware for this rproc + * was loaded, parsed successfully, and all of its resource requirements + * were met. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + u32 boot_addr; + int ret; + + client->dev = dev; + client->tx_done = NULL; + client->rx_callback = k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback; + client->tx_block = false; + client->knows_txdone = false; + + kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) { + ret = -EBUSY; + dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n", + PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox)); + return ret; + } + + /* + * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now; + * there is no functional effect whatsoever. + * + * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message + * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted. + */ + ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret); + goto put_mbox; + } + + boot_addr = rproc->bootaddr; + if (boot_addr & (kproc->data->boot_align_addr - 1)) { + dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%x, must be aligned on a 0x%x boundary\n", + boot_addr, kproc->data->boot_align_addr); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto put_mbox; + } + + dev_err(dev, "booting DSP core using boot addr = 0x%x\n", boot_addr); + ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(kproc->tsp, boot_addr, 0, 0); + if (ret) + goto put_mbox; + + ret = k3_dsp_rproc_release(kproc); + if (ret) + goto put_mbox; + + return 0; + +put_mbox: + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); + return ret; +} + +/* + * Stop the DSP remote processor. + * + * This function puts the DSP processor into reset, and finishes processing + * of any pending messages. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); + + k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Custom function to translate a DSP device address (internal RAMs only) to a + * kernel virtual address. The DSPs can access their RAMs at either an internal + * address visible only from a DSP, or at the SoC-level bus address. Both these + * addresses need to be looked through for translation. The translated addresses + * can be used either by the remoteproc core for loading (when using kernel + * remoteproc loader), or by any rpmsg bus drivers. + */ +static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + void __iomem *va = NULL; + phys_addr_t bus_addr; + u32 dev_addr, offset; + size_t size; + int i; + + if (len == 0) + return NULL; + + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_mems; i++) { + bus_addr = kproc->mem[i].bus_addr; + dev_addr = kproc->mem[i].dev_addr; + size = kproc->mem[i].size; + + if (da < KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK) { + /* handle DSP-view addresses */ + if (da >= dev_addr && + ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } else { + /* handle SoC-view addresses */ + if (da >= bus_addr && + (da + len) <= (bus_addr + size)) { + offset = da - bus_addr; + va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + } + + /* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */ + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) { + dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr; + size = kproc->rmem[i].size; + + if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) { + offset = da - dev_addr; + va = kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr + offset; + return (__force void *)va; + } + } + + return NULL; +} + +static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = { + .start = k3_dsp_rproc_start, + .stop = k3_dsp_rproc_stop, + .kick = k3_dsp_rproc_kick, + .da_to_va = k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va, +}; + +static int k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev, + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data = kproc->data; + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct resource *res; + int num_mems = 0; + int i; + + num_mems = kproc->data->num_mems; + kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(kproc->dev, num_mems, + sizeof(*kproc->mem), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!kproc->mem) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) { + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, + data->mems[i].name); + if (!res) { + dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n", + data->mems[i].name); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start, + resource_size(res), + dev_name(dev))) { + dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n", + data->mems[i].name); + return -EBUSY; + } + + kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start, + resource_size(res)); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr)) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n", + data->mems[i].name); + return PTR_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr); + } + kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start; + kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr; + kproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res); + + dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + data->mems[i].name, &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr, + kproc->mem[i].size, kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr, + kproc->mem[i].dev_addr); + } + kproc->num_mems = num_mems; + + return 0; +} + +static int k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct device_node *rmem_np; + struct reserved_mem *rmem; + int num_rmems; + int ret, i; + + num_rmems = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region", + sizeof(phandle)); + if (num_rmems <= 0) { + dev_err(dev, "device does not reserved memory regions, ret = %d\n", + num_rmems); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (num_rmems < 2) { + dev_err(dev, "device needs atleast two memory regions to be defined, num = %d\n", + num_rmems); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* use reserved memory region 0 for vring DMA allocations */ + ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np, 0); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "device cannot initialize DMA pool, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + num_rmems--; + kproc->rmem = kcalloc(num_rmems, sizeof(*kproc->rmem), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!kproc->rmem) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto release_rmem; + } + + /* use remaining reserved memory regions for static carveouts */ + for (i = 0; i < num_rmems; i++) { + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i + 1); + if (!rmem_np) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np); + if (!rmem) { + of_node_put(rmem_np); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + of_node_put(rmem_np); + + kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr = rmem->base; + /* 64-bit address regions currently not supported */ + kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr = (u32)rmem->base; + kproc->rmem[i].size = rmem->size; + kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = ioremap_wc(rmem->base, rmem->size); + if (!kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to map reserved memory#%d at %pa of size %pa\n", + i + 1, &rmem->base, &rmem->size); + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto unmap_rmem; + } + + dev_dbg(dev, "reserved memory%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n", + i + 1, &kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr, + kproc->rmem[i].size, kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr, + kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr); + } + kproc->num_rmems = num_rmems; + + return 0; + +unmap_rmem: + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + if (kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) + iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr); + } + kfree(kproc->rmem); +release_rmem: + of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev); + return ret; +} + +static void k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) + iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr); + kfree(kproc->rmem); + + of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev); +} + +static +struct ti_sci_proc *k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev, + const struct ti_sci_handle *sci) +{ + struct ti_sci_proc *tsp; + u32 temp[2]; + int ret; + + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-proc-ids", + temp, 2); + if (ret < 0) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + + tsp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!tsp) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + tsp->dev = dev; + tsp->sci = sci; + tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops; + tsp->proc_id = temp[0]; + tsp->host_id = temp[1]; + + return tsp; +} + +static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data; + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc; + struct rproc *rproc; + const char *fw_name; + int ret = 0; + int ret1; + + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); + if (!data) + return -ENODEV; + + ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to parse firmware-name property, ret = %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } + + rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &k3_dsp_rproc_ops, fw_name, + sizeof(*kproc)); + if (!rproc) + return -ENOMEM; + + rproc->has_iommu = false; + rproc->recovery_disabled = true; + kproc = rproc->priv; + kproc->rproc = rproc; + kproc->dev = dev; + kproc->data = data; + + kproc->ti_sci = ti_sci_get_by_phandle(np, "ti,sci"); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->ti_sci)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get ti-sci handle, ret = %d\n", + ret); + } + kproc->ti_sci = NULL; + goto free_rproc; + } + + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n"); + goto put_sci; + } + + kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->reset); + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset, status = %d\n", ret); + goto put_sci; + } + + kproc->tsp = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci); + if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsp)) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to construct ti-sci proc control, ret = %d\n", + ret); + ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp); + goto put_sci; + } + + ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "ti_sci_proc_request failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto free_tsp; + } + + ret = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(pdev, kproc); + if (ret) + goto release_tsp; + + ret = k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(kproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "reserved memory init failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + goto release_tsp; + } + + ret = rproc_add(rproc); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n", + ret); + goto release_mem; + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, kproc); + + return 0; + +release_mem: + k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc); +release_tsp: + ret1 = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp); + if (ret1) + dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret1); +free_tsp: + kfree(kproc->tsp); +put_sci: + ret1 = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci); + if (ret1) + dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret1); +free_rproc: + rproc_free(rproc); + return ret; +} + +static int k3_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + int ret; + + rproc_del(kproc->rproc); + + ret = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret); + + kfree(kproc->tsp); + + ret = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret); + + k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc); + rproc_free(kproc->rproc); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct k3_dsp_mem_data c66_mems[] = { + { .name = "l2sram", .dev_addr = 0x800000 }, + { .name = "l1pram", .dev_addr = 0xe00000 }, + { .name = "l1dram", .dev_addr = 0xf00000 }, +}; + +static const struct k3_dsp_dev_data c66_data = { + .mems = c66_mems, + .num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(c66_mems), + .boot_align_addr = SZ_1K, + .uses_lreset = true, +}; + +static const struct of_device_id k3_dsp_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp", .data = &c66_data, }, + { /* sentinel */ }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_dsp_of_match); + +static struct platform_driver k3_dsp_rproc_driver = { + .probe = k3_dsp_rproc_probe, + .remove = k3_dsp_rproc_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "k3-dsp-rproc", + .of_match_table = k3_dsp_of_match, + }, +}; + +module_platform_driver(k3_dsp_rproc_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Suman Anna "); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 DSP Remoteproc driver"); From patchwork Fri Jun 12 22:49:14 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 11602339 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94224912 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C682078A for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Gq+QMB9K"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="lR6+haSK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 41C682078A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=DVedVKnQWtACMYWqwxuDBuIcs0gJiZ4JBmh+Xyj7bx4=; b=Gq+QMB9KnFnMBi TcQpcaQ0AY1TynBF+OqtDGg0ChgmfQV8ZjeVgeUbNT6sHXvf4TdEz+0L0+VvDDXgUTdNNMqui+rZg tFgALA834y3Hiro1ITNdpjYUHHmlwCRRuTrw3BCQol2H+jfWKjaEbvC8Qbv5KvcgR+pyDjuxEJFJx ruy0kLGY32NcHKpS9qpi1owS8nl7wxlBPfvlP2Rqsub2A9FuaYRleDNp76TqoKdU+19p/hrng9Mrk n5otDio/rgOvScwA3tWcIQRWUuuBtqsZGD2H0IPPO0gzOml65ExVQs+TLGNMq9wsghz9vdbfN7G37 MSBaI3q2//wi/kRhihSQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsVr-0005D4-32; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:51:03 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jjsUQ-0001dR-1h for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 22:49:36 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnW69103516; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1592002172; bh=dJfNet5z/jwMk1KyTLxkDrBpDH/7oBNjz2rfy7DYy2k=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=lR6+haSK7Q96LT+l3dgEHmT3JM9s7Op/GiuFx8ZW0aTA16ULzKblbmVpmdDyeCdAk 4EigFPgX5On2KBpD8NSdXG1yR+MvWFDgVSL99Y8INp7b89h5stoYQE4Vxrud0aAjc2 jef3So1ghR/1D0Z4x6xsneilteNme/evCfQlwOTc= Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (dlee109.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.41]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05CMnW1f119692 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:32 -0500 Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:32 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:32 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 05CMnW0e112307; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:32 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.48.148]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 05CMnWtG062201; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:32 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Mathieu Poirier Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Add support for L2RAM loading on C66x DSPs Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20200612224914.7634-7-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200612224914.7634-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200612_154934_178674_F2764E1E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.10 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.4 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.5 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [198.47.19.141 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted High sender X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Lokesh Vutla , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suman Anna , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The resets for the DSP processors on K3 SoCs are managed through the Power and Sleep Controller (PSC) module. Each DSP typically has two resets - a global module reset for powering on the device, and a local reset that affects only the CPU while allowing access to the other sub-modules within the DSP processor sub-systems. The C66x DSPs have two levels of internal RAMs that can be used to boot from, and the firmware loading into these RAMs require the local reset to be asserted with the device powered on/enabled using the module reset. Enhance the K3 DSP remoteproc driver to add support for loading into the internal RAMs. The local reset is deasserted on SoC power-on-reset, so logic has to be added in probe in remoteproc mode to balance the remoteproc state-machine. Note that the local resets are a no-op on C71x cores, and the hardware does not supporting loading into its internal RAMs. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v3: No code changes, picked up review tags, switched to : in patch title v2: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11561785/ drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c index 2f8b3ff5427d..668bb45b3fe8 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) return ret; } + if (kproc->data->uses_lreset) + return ret; + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id); if (ret) { @@ -192,6 +195,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) struct device *dev = kproc->dev; int ret; + if (kproc->data->uses_lreset) + goto lreset; + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, kproc->ti_sci_id); if (ret) { @@ -199,6 +205,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) return ret; } +lreset: ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); @@ -210,6 +217,53 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) return ret; } +/* + * The C66x DSP cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a + * generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the DSP internal + * memories to be accessed while the local reset is asserted. This function is + * used to release the global reset on C66x DSPs to allow loading into the DSP + * internal RAMs. The .prepare() ops is invoked by remoteproc core before any + * firmware loading, and is followed by the .start() ops after loading to + * actually let the C66x DSP cores run. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, cannot enable internal RAM loading, ret = %d\n", + ret); + + return ret; +} + +/* + * This function implements the .unprepare() ops and performs the complimentary + * operations to that of the .prepare() ops. The function is used to assert the + * global reset on applicable C66x cores. This completes the second portion of + * powering down the C66x DSP cores. The cores themselves are only halted in the + * .stop() callback through the local reset, and the .unprepare() ops is invoked + * by the remoteproc core after the remoteproc is stopped to balance the global + * reset. + */ +static int k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; + int ret; + + ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, + kproc->ti_sci_id); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret); + + return ret; +} + /* * Power up the DSP remote processor. * @@ -353,6 +407,8 @@ static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len) } static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = { + .prepare = k3_dsp_rproc_prepare, + .unprepare = k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare, .start = k3_dsp_rproc_start, .stop = k3_dsp_rproc_stop, .kick = k3_dsp_rproc_kick, @@ -615,6 +671,22 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto release_tsp; } + /* + * ensure the DSP local reset is asserted to ensure the DSP doesn't + * execute bogus code in .prepare() when the module reset is released. + */ + if (data->uses_lreset) { + ret = reset_control_status(kproc->reset); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset status, status = %d\n", + ret); + goto release_mem; + } else if (ret == 0) { + dev_warn(dev, "local reset is deasserted for device\n"); + k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc); + } + } + ret = rproc_add(rproc); if (ret) { dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n",