From patchwork Thu Sep 17 11:36:29 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Miaohe Lin X-Patchwork-Id: 11782301 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A366CA for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD1721D92 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:38:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2AD1721D92 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 527B06B0003; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:38:05 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: linux-mm-outgoing@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4AF7A6B0037; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:38:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3776E6B0055; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:38:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: linux-mm@kvack.org X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0057.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.57]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC5E6B0003 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:38:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5866181AEF1A for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:38:04 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77272354488.25.test04_510362d27122 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BD91807653E for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:38:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Summary: 1,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,linmiaohe@huawei.com,,RULES_HIT:30029:30054,0,RBL:45.249.212.32:@huawei.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.18.2.100 64.95.201.95;04y8hzhd5mtytsy1t7skkn8w9ye9rophu14dnt7888sfy454855ag5rm6yhbbue.kaczd6zs483qgf8wnijcygchixet9k8p8zzcrsu83z3bbjhqt3e8psc8qgey8eu.e-lbl8.mailshell.net-223.238.255.100,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fp,MSBL:0,DNSBL:neutral,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:25,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: test04_510362d27122 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1996 Received: from huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) by imf22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 48287A420ECFB0813089; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:37:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.104.175) by DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:37:46 +0800 From: Miaohe Lin To: CC: , , Subject: [PATCH] mm/page_counter: Correct the obsolete func name in the comment of page_counter_try_charge() Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 07:36:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20200917113629.14382-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.104.175] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A3BD91807653E X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Since commit bbec2e15170a ("mm: rename page_counter's count/limit into usage/max"), page_counter_limit() is renamed to page_counter_set_max(). So replace page_counter_limit with page_counter_set_max in comment. Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin --- mm/page_counter.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/page_counter.c b/mm/page_counter.c index afe22ad335cc..b24a60b28bb0 100644 --- a/mm/page_counter.c +++ b/mm/page_counter.c @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page_counter *counter, * * The atomic_long_add_return() implies a full memory * barrier between incrementing the count and reading - * the limit. When racing with page_counter_limit(), + * the limit. When racing with page_counter_set_max(), * we either see the new limit or the setter sees the * counter has changed and retries. */