From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:22:52 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897213 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F874921 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A23E2076E for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726690AbgKKJYD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:24:03 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2082 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726061AbgKKJYC (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:24:02 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK4w3zX1z67KXd; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:22:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:23:59 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu , Subject: [PATCH v3 01/11] evm: Execute evm_inode_init_security() only when an HMAC key is loaded Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:22:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-2-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org evm_inode_init_security() requires an HMAC key to calculate the HMAC on initial xattrs provided by LSMs. However, it checks generically whether a key has been loaded, including also public keys, which is not correct as public keys are not suitable to calculate the HMAC. Originally, support for signature verification was introduced to verify a possibly immutable initial ram disk, when no new files are created, and to switch to HMAC for the root filesystem. By that time, an HMAC key should have been loaded and usable to calculate HMACs for new files. More recently support for requiring an HMAC key was removed from the kernel, so that signature verification can be used alone. Since this is a legitimate use case, evm_inode_init_security() should not return an error when no HMAC key has been loaded. This patch fixes this problem by replacing the evm_key_loaded() check with a check of the EVM_INIT_HMAC flag in evm_initialized. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.5.x Fixes: 26ddabfe96b ("evm: enable EVM when X509 certificate is loaded") Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 76d19146d74b..001e001eae01 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -530,7 +530,8 @@ int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct evm_xattr *xattr_data; int rc; - if (!evm_key_loaded() || !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattr->name)) + if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) || + !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattr->name)) return 0; xattr_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*xattr_data), GFP_NOFS); From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:22:53 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897217 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52F915E6 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9EB20809 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727082AbgKKJY2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:24:28 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2083 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726134AbgKKJYC (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:24:02 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK583sbfz67JlR; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:22:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:23:59 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v3 02/11] evm: Load EVM key in ima_load_x509() to avoid appraisal Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:22:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Public keys do not need to be appraised by IMA as the restriction on the IMA/EVM keyrings ensures that a key can be loaded only if it is signed with a key in the primary or secondary keyring. However, when evm_load_x509() is called, appraisal is already enabled and a valid IMA signature must be added to the EVM key to pass verification. Since the restriction is applied on both IMA and EVM keyrings, it is safe to disable appraisal also when the EVM key is loaded. This patch calls evm_load_x509() inside ima_load_x509() if CONFIG_IMA_LOAD_X509 is defined. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/iint.c | 2 ++ security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/security/integrity/iint.c b/security/integrity/iint.c index 1d20003243c3..7d08c31c612f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/iint.c +++ b/security/integrity/iint.c @@ -200,7 +200,9 @@ int integrity_kernel_read(struct file *file, loff_t offset, void __init integrity_load_keys(void) { ima_load_x509(); +#ifndef CONFIG_IMA_LOAD_X509 evm_load_x509(); +#endif } static int __init integrity_fs_init(void) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c index 4902fe7bd570..9d29a1680da8 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c @@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ void __init ima_load_x509(void) ima_policy_flag &= ~unset_flags; integrity_load_x509(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA, CONFIG_IMA_X509_PATH); + + /* load also EVM key to avoid appraisal */ + evm_load_x509(); + ima_policy_flag |= unset_flags; } #endif From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:22:54 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897211 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F91A15E6 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585622076E for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727103AbgKKJYS (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:24:18 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2084 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726181AbgKKJYD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:24:03 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK4x6Rhqz67K9t; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:22:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:24:00 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu , Subject: [PATCH v3 03/11] evm: Refuse EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES only if an HMAC key is loaded Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:22:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-4-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES is an EVM initialization flag that can be set to temporarily disable metadata verification until all xattrs/attrs necessary to verify an EVM portable signature are copied to the file. This flag is cleared when EVM is initialized with an HMAC key, to avoid that the HMAC is calculated on unverified xattrs/attrs. Currently EVM unnecessarily denies setting this flag if EVM is initialized with a public key, which is not a concern as it cannot be used to trust xattrs/attrs updates. This patch removes this limitation. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16.x Fixes: ae1ba1676b88e ("EVM: Allow userland to permit modification of EVM-protected metadata") Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu --- Documentation/ABI/testing/evm | 5 +++-- security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm b/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm index 3c477ba48a31..eb6d70fd6fa2 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm @@ -49,8 +49,9 @@ Description: modification of EVM-protected metadata and disable all further modification of policy - Note that once a key has been loaded, it will no longer be - possible to enable metadata modification. + Note that once an HMAC key has been loaded, it will no longer + be possible to enable metadata modification and, if it is + already enabled, it will be disabled. Until key loading has been signaled EVM can not create or validate the 'security.evm' xattr, but returns diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c index cfc3075769bb..92fe26ace797 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static ssize_t evm_write_key(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, * keys are loaded. */ if ((i & EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES) && - ((evm_initialized & EVM_KEY_MASK) != 0) && + ((evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) != 0) && !(evm_initialized & EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES)) return -EPERM; From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:22:55 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897203 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBD6921 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330DF20825 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727013AbgKKJYL (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:24:11 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2085 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726300AbgKKJYD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:24:03 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK4y3z4Nz67KC3; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:22:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:24:01 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v3 04/11] ima: Move ima_reset_appraise_flags() call to post hooks Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:22:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-5-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org ima_inode_setxattr() and ima_inode_removexattr() hooks are called before an operation is performed. Thus, ima_reset_appraise_flags() should not be called there, as flags might be unnecessarily reset if the operation is denied. This patch introduces the post hooks ima_inode_post_setxattr() and ima_inode_post_removexattr(), removes ima_inode_removexattr() and adds the call to ima_reset_appraise_flags() in the new functions. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu --- fs/xattr.c | 2 ++ include/linux/ima.h | 19 +++++++++++++++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 22 +++++++++++++++------- security/security.c | 4 +--- 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xattr.c b/fs/xattr.c index cd7a563e8bcd..149b8cf5f99f 100644 --- a/fs/xattr.c +++ b/fs/xattr.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -474,6 +475,7 @@ __vfs_removexattr_locked(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, if (!error) { fsnotify_xattr(dentry); + ima_inode_post_removexattr(dentry, name); evm_inode_post_removexattr(dentry, name); } diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h index ac3d82f962f2..19a775fa2ba5 100644 --- a/include/linux/ima.h +++ b/include/linux/ima.h @@ -150,7 +150,12 @@ extern bool is_ima_appraise_enabled(void); extern void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry); extern int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len); -extern int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name); +extern void ima_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, + const char *xattr_name, + const void *xattr_value, + size_t xattr_value_len); +extern void ima_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, + const char *xattr_name); #else static inline bool is_ima_appraise_enabled(void) { @@ -170,10 +175,16 @@ static inline int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, return 0; } -static inline int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, - const char *xattr_name) +static inline void ima_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, + const char *xattr_name, + const void *xattr_value, + size_t xattr_value_len) +{ +} + +static inline void ima_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, + const char *xattr_name) { - return 0; } #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE */ diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 8361941ee0a1..77c01f50425e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -574,21 +574,29 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, if (result == 1) { if (!xattr_value_len || (xvalue->type >= IMA_XATTR_LAST)) return -EINVAL; - ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), - xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); result = 0; } return result; } -int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) +void ima_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) +{ + const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xvalue = xattr_value; + int result; + + result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, + xattr_value_len); + if (result == 1) + ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), + xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); +} + +void ima_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) { int result; result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0); - if (result == 1) { + if (result == 1) ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), 0); - result = 0; - } - return result; } diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index a28045dc9e7f..fc43f45938b4 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -1309,6 +1309,7 @@ void security_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, if (unlikely(IS_PRIVATE(d_backing_inode(dentry)))) return; call_void_hook(inode_post_setxattr, dentry, name, value, size, flags); + ima_inode_post_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size); evm_inode_post_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size); } @@ -1339,9 +1340,6 @@ int security_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name) ret = call_int_hook(inode_removexattr, 1, dentry, name); if (ret == 1) ret = cap_inode_removexattr(dentry, name); - if (ret) - return ret; - ret = ima_inode_removexattr(dentry, name); if (ret) return ret; return evm_inode_removexattr(dentry, name); From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:22:56 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897239 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C96139F for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B2120759 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726437AbgKKJZU (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:20 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2086 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725960AbgKKJZO (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:14 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK602vCQz67DcY; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:23:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:25:12 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v3 05/11] evm: Introduce evm_status_revalidate() Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:22:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-6-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org When EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES is set, EVM allows any operation on metadata. Its main purpose is to allow users to freely set metadata when it is protected by a portable signature, until an HMAC key is loaded. However, callers of evm_verifyxattr() are not notified about metadata changes and continue to rely on the last status returned by the function. For example IMA, since it caches the appraisal result, will not call again evm_verifyxattr() until the appraisal flags are cleared, and will grant access to the file even if there was a metadata operation that made the portable signature invalid. This patch introduces evm_status_revalidate(), which callers of evm_verifyxattr() can use in their xattr post hooks to determine whether re-validation is necessary and to do the proper actions. IMA calls it in its xattr post hooks to reset the appraisal flags, so that the EVM status is re-evaluated after a metadata operation. Lastly, this patch also adds a call to evm_reset_status() in evm_inode_post_setattr() to invalidate the cached EVM status after a setattr operation. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu --- include/linux/evm.h | 6 +++++ security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 8 ++++--- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/evm.h b/include/linux/evm.h index 8302bc29bb35..e5b7bcb152b9 100644 --- a/include/linux/evm.h +++ b/include/linux/evm.h @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ extern void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, extern int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, struct xattr *evm); +extern bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name); #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL extern int posix_xattr_acl(const char *xattrname); #else @@ -104,5 +105,10 @@ static inline int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, return 0; } +static inline bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name) +{ + return false; +} + #endif /* CONFIG_EVM */ #endif /* LINUX_EVM_H */ diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 001e001eae01..b38ffa39faa8 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -425,6 +425,30 @@ static void evm_reset_status(struct inode *inode) iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; } +/** + * evm_status_revalidate - report whether EVM status re-validation is necessary + * @xattr_name: pointer to the affected extended attribute name + * + * Report whether callers of evm_verifyxattr() should re-validate the + * EVM status. + * + * Return true if re-validation is necessary, false otherwise. + */ +bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name) +{ + if (!evm_key_loaded()) + return false; + + /* evm_inode_post_setattr() passes NULL */ + if (!xattr_name) + return true; + + if (!evm_protected_xattr(xattr_name) && !posix_xattr_acl(xattr_name)) + return false; + + return true; +} + /** * evm_inode_post_setxattr - update 'security.evm' to reflect the changes * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry @@ -441,8 +465,7 @@ static void evm_reset_status(struct inode *inode) void evm_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) { - if (!evm_key_loaded() || (!evm_protected_xattr(xattr_name) - && !posix_xattr_acl(xattr_name))) + if (!evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) return; evm_reset_status(dentry->d_inode); @@ -462,7 +485,7 @@ void evm_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, */ void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) { - if (!evm_key_loaded() || !evm_protected_xattr(xattr_name)) + if (!evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) return; evm_reset_status(dentry->d_inode); @@ -513,9 +536,11 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) */ void evm_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, int ia_valid) { - if (!evm_key_loaded()) + if (!evm_status_revalidate(NULL)) return; + evm_reset_status(dentry->d_inode); + if (ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID)) evm_update_evmxattr(dentry, NULL, NULL, 0); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 77c01f50425e..7b13ba543873 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -583,13 +583,15 @@ void ima_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) { const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xvalue = xattr_value; + int digsig = 0; int result; result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, xattr_value_len); if (result == 1) - ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), - xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); + digsig = (xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); + if (result == 1 || evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) + ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), digsig); } void ima_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) @@ -597,6 +599,6 @@ void ima_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) int result; result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0); - if (result == 1) + if (result == 1 || evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), 0); } From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:22:57 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897233 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025A1921 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE9A20756 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726945AbgKKJZU (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:20 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2087 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726395AbgKKJZP (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:15 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK6Y4jxYz67KnD; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:23:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:25:12 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v3 06/11] evm: Ignore INTEGRITY_NOLABEL if no HMAC key is loaded Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:22:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-7-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org When a file is being created, LSMs can set the initial label with the inode_init_security hook. If no HMAC key is loaded, the new file will have LSM xattrs but not the HMAC. Unfortunately, EVM will deny any further metadata operation on new files, as evm_protect_xattr() will always return the INTEGRITY_NOLABEL error. This would limit the usability of EVM when only a public key is loaded, as commands such as cp or tar with the option to preserve xattrs won't work. Ignoring this error won't be an issue if no HMAC key is loaded, as the inode is locked until the post hook, and EVM won't calculate the HMAC on metadata that wasn't previously verified. Thus this patch checks if an HMAC key is loaded and if not, ignores INTEGRITY_NOLABEL. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu --- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index b38ffa39faa8..4f4404a12bbd 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -354,6 +354,14 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, -EPERM, 0); } out: + /* + * Ignoring INTEGRITY_NOLABEL is safe if no HMAC key is loaded, as + * EVM won't calculate the HMAC of metadata that wasn't previously + * verified. + */ + if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL && + !(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC)) + return 0; if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS) integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", @@ -514,8 +522,15 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) if (!(ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID))) return 0; evm_status = evm_verify_current_integrity(dentry); + /* + * Ignoring INTEGRITY_NOLABEL is safe if no HMAC key is loaded, as + * EVM won't calculate the HMAC of metadata that wasn't previously + * verified. + */ if ((evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS) || - (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS)) + (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS) || + (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL && + !(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC))) return 0; integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:22:58 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897229 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFEF139F for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B97920756 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726974AbgKKJZU (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:20 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2088 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726755AbgKKJZQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:16 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK6Z2Dnnz67JlR; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:23:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:25:13 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v3 07/11] evm: Allow xattr/attr operations for portable signatures Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:22:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-8-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org If files with portable signatures are copied from one location to another or are extracted from an archive, verification can temporarily fail until all xattrs/attrs are set in the destination. Only portable signatures may be moved or copied from one file to another, as they don't depend on system-specific information such as the inode generation. Instead portable signatures must include security.ima. Unlike other security.evm types, EVM portable signatures are also immutable. Thus, it wouldn't be a problem to allow xattr/attr operations when verification fails, as portable signatures will never be replaced with the HMAC on possibly corrupted xattrs/attrs. This patch first introduces a new integrity status called INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE, that allows callers of evm_verify_current_integrity() to detect that a portable signature didn't pass verification and then adds an exception in evm_protect_xattr() and evm_inode_setattr() for this status and returns 0 instead of -EPERM. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- include/linux/integrity.h | 1 + security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++------ security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/integrity.h b/include/linux/integrity.h index 2271939c5c31..2ea0f2f65ab6 100644 --- a/include/linux/integrity.h +++ b/include/linux/integrity.h @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ enum integrity_status { INTEGRITY_PASS = 0, INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE, INTEGRITY_FAIL, + INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE, INTEGRITY_NOLABEL, INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS, INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN, diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 4f4404a12bbd..60ab700735ea 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ int evm_initialized; static const char * const integrity_status_msg[] = { - "pass", "pass_immutable", "fail", "no_label", "no_xattrs", "unknown" + "pass", "pass_immutable", "fail", "fail_immutable", "no_label", + "no_xattrs", "unknown" }; int evm_hmac_attrs; @@ -137,7 +138,7 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, enum integrity_status evm_status = INTEGRITY_PASS; struct evm_digest digest; struct inode *inode; - int rc, xattr_len; + int rc, xattr_len, evm_immutable = 0; if (iint && (iint->evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS || iint->evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE)) @@ -182,8 +183,10 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, if (rc) rc = -EINVAL; break; - case EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG: case EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG: + evm_immutable = 1; + fallthrough; + case EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG: /* accept xattr with non-empty signature field */ if (xattr_len <= sizeof(struct signature_v2_hdr)) { evm_status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; @@ -220,9 +223,12 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, break; } - if (rc) - evm_status = (rc == -ENODATA) ? - INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS : INTEGRITY_FAIL; + if (rc) { + evm_status = INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS; + if (rc != -ENODATA) + evm_status = evm_immutable ? + INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE : INTEGRITY_FAIL; + } out: if (iint) iint->evm_status = evm_status; @@ -362,6 +368,14 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL && !(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC)) return 0; + + /* + * Writing other xattrs is safe for portable signatures, as portable + * signatures are immutable and can never be updated. + */ + if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE) + return 0; + if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS) integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", @@ -526,12 +540,17 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) * Ignoring INTEGRITY_NOLABEL is safe if no HMAC key is loaded, as * EVM won't calculate the HMAC of metadata that wasn't previously * verified. + * + * Writing attrs is safe for portable signatures, as portable signatures + * are immutable and can never be updated. */ if ((evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS) || (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS) || + (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE) || (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL && !(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC))) return 0; + integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", integrity_status_msg[evm_status], -EPERM, 0); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 7b13ba543873..57a252f8c724 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -415,6 +415,8 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, case INTEGRITY_NOLABEL: /* No security.evm xattr. */ cause = "missing-HMAC"; goto out; + case INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE: + fallthrough; case INTEGRITY_FAIL: /* Invalid HMAC/signature. */ cause = "invalid-HMAC"; goto out; From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:22:59 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897251 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7284E921 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3FD20759 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727174AbgKKJZi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:38 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2089 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726885AbgKKJZQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:16 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK6M5Hmgz67KXh; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:23:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:25:14 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v3 08/11] evm: Allow setxattr() and setattr() for unmodified metadata Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:22:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-9-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org With the patch to allow xattr/attr operations if a portable signature verification fails, cp and tar can copy all xattrs/attrs so that at the end of the process verification succeeds. However, it might happen that the xattrs/attrs are already set to the correct value (taken at signing time) and signature verification succeeds before the copy has completed. For example, an archive might contains files owned by root and the archive is extracted by root. Then, since portable signatures are immutable, all subsequent operations fail (e.g. fchown()), even if the operation is legitimate (does not alter the current value). This patch avoids this problem by reporting successful operation to user space when that operation does not alter the current value of xattrs/attrs. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reported-by: kernel test robot --- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 60ab700735ea..1b2eea30e11e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -310,6 +311,78 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_current_integrity(struct dentry *dentry) return evm_verify_hmac(dentry, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL); } +/* + * evm_xattr_acl_change - check if passed ACL changes the inode mode + * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry + * @xattr_name: requested xattr + * @xattr_value: requested xattr value + * @xattr_value_len: requested xattr value length + * + * Check if passed ACL changes the inode mode, which is protected by EVM. + * + * Returns 1 if passed ACL causes inode mode change, 0 otherwise. + */ +static int evm_xattr_acl_change(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) +{ + umode_t mode; + struct posix_acl *acl = NULL, *acl_res; + struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry); + int rc; + + /* UID/GID in ACL have been already converted from user to init ns */ + acl = posix_acl_from_xattr(&init_user_ns, xattr_value, xattr_value_len); + if (!acl) + return 1; + + acl_res = acl; + rc = posix_acl_update_mode(inode, &mode, &acl_res); + + posix_acl_release(acl); + + if (rc) + return 1; + + if (acl_res && inode->i_mode != mode) + return 1; + + return 0; +} + +/* + * evm_xattr_change - check if passed xattr value differs from current value + * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry + * @xattr_name: requested xattr + * @xattr_value: requested xattr value + * @xattr_value_len: requested xattr value length + * + * Check if passed xattr value differs from current value. + * + * Returns 1 if passed xattr value differs from current value, 0 otherwise. + */ +static int evm_xattr_change(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) +{ + char *xattr_data = NULL; + int rc = 0; + + if (posix_xattr_acl(xattr_name)) + return evm_xattr_acl_change(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, + xattr_value_len); + + rc = vfs_getxattr_alloc(dentry, xattr_name, &xattr_data, 0, GFP_NOFS); + if (rc < 0) + return 1; + + if (rc == xattr_value_len) + rc = memcmp(xattr_value, xattr_data, rc); + else + rc = 1; + + kfree(xattr_data); + return rc; +} + /* * evm_protect_xattr - protect the EVM extended attribute * @@ -376,6 +449,10 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE) return 0; + if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE && + !evm_xattr_change(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, xattr_value_len)) + return 0; + if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS) integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", @@ -515,6 +592,19 @@ void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) evm_update_evmxattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0); } +static int evm_attr_change(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) +{ + struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry); + unsigned int ia_valid = attr->ia_valid; + + if ((!(ia_valid & ATTR_UID) || uid_eq(attr->ia_uid, inode->i_uid)) && + (!(ia_valid & ATTR_GID) || gid_eq(attr->ia_gid, inode->i_gid)) && + (!(ia_valid & ATTR_MODE) || attr->ia_mode == inode->i_mode)) + return 0; + + return 1; +} + /** * evm_inode_setattr - prevent updating an invalid EVM extended attribute * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry @@ -551,6 +641,10 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) !(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC))) return 0; + if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE && + !evm_attr_change(dentry, attr)) + return 0; + integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", integrity_status_msg[evm_status], -EPERM, 0); From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:23:00 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897243 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165C9921 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C3A20759 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727138AbgKKJZi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:38 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2090 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726893AbgKKJZR (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:25:17 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK630vF5z67JkG; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:23:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:25:15 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v3 09/11] ima: Allow imasig requirement to be satisfied by EVM portable signatures Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:23:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-10-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org System administrators can require that all accessed files have a signature by specifying appraise_type=imasig in a policy rule. Currently, IMA signatures satisfy this requirement. Appended signatures may also satisfy this requirement, but are not applicable as IMA signatures. IMA/appended signatures ensure data source authentication for file content and prevent any change. EVM signatures instead ensure data source authentication for file metadata. Given that the digest or signature of the file content must be included in the metadata, EVM signatures provide the same file data guarantees of IMA signatures, as well as providing file metadata guarantees. This patch lets systems protected with EVM signatures pass appraisal verification if the appraise_type=imasig requirement is specified in the policy. This facilitates deployment in the scenarios where only EVM signatures are available. The patch makes the following changes: file xattr types: security.ima: IMA_XATTR_DIGEST/IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG security.evm: EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG execve(), mmap(), open() behavior (with appraise_type=imasig): before: denied (file without IMA signature, imasig requirement not met) after: allowed (file with EVM portable signature, imasig requirement met) open(O_WRONLY) behavior (without appraise_type=imasig): before: allowed (file without IMA signature, not immutable) after: denied (file with EVM portable signature, immutable) In addition, similarly to IMA signatures, this patch temporarily allows new files without or with incomplete metadata to be opened so that content can be written. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 57a252f8c724..00b038941a10 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -241,12 +241,16 @@ static int xattr_verify(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, hash_start = 1; fallthrough; case IMA_XATTR_DIGEST: - if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { - *cause = "IMA-signature-required"; - *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; - break; + if (*status != INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE) { + if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { + *cause = "IMA-signature-required"; + *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; + break; + } + clear_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); + } else { + set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); } - clear_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); if (xattr_len - sizeof(xattr_value->type) - hash_start >= iint->ima_hash->length) /* @@ -416,6 +420,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, cause = "missing-HMAC"; goto out; case INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE: + set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); fallthrough; case INTEGRITY_FAIL: /* Invalid HMAC/signature. */ cause = "invalid-HMAC"; @@ -460,9 +465,12 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, status = INTEGRITY_PASS; } - /* Permit new files with file signatures, but without data. */ + /* + * Permit new files with file/EVM portable signatures, but + * without data. + */ if (inode->i_size == 0 && iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE && - xattr_value && xattr_value->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG) { + test_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags)) { status = INTEGRITY_PASS; } @@ -592,6 +600,8 @@ void ima_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, xattr_value_len); if (result == 1) digsig = (xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); + if (!strcmp(xattr_name, XATTR_NAME_EVM) && xattr_value_len > 0) + digsig = (xvalue->type == EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG); if (result == 1 || evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), digsig); } From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:23:01 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897257 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E38F921 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DD12072C for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726868AbgKKJ0a (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:26:30 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2091 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726719AbgKKJ02 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:26:28 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK7l17D6z67KXD; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:24:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:26:25 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v3 10/11] ima: Introduce template field evmsig and write to field sig as fallback Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:23:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-11-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org With the patch to accept EVM portable signatures when the appraise_type=imasig requirement is specified in the policy, appraisal can be successfully done even if the file does not have an IMA signature. However, remote attestation would not see that a different signature type was used, as only IMA signatures can be included in the measurement list. This patch solves the issue by introducing the new template field 'evmsig' to show EVM portable signatures and by including its value in the existing field 'sig' if the IMA signature is not found. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar --- Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst | 4 ++- security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c | 2 ++ security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++- security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst b/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst index c5a8432972ef..9f3e86ab028a 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst @@ -70,9 +70,11 @@ descriptors by adding their identifier to the format string prefix is shown only if the hash algorithm is not SHA1 or MD5); - 'd-modsig': the digest of the event without the appended modsig; - 'n-ng': the name of the event, without size limitations; - - 'sig': the file signature; + - 'sig': the file signature, or the EVM portable signature if the file + signature is not found; - 'modsig' the appended file signature; - 'buf': the buffer data that was used to generate the hash without size limitations; + - 'evmsig': the EVM portable signature; Below, there is the list of defined template descriptors: diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c index 1e89e2d3851f..02afc4116606 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ static const struct ima_template_field supported_fields[] = { .field_show = ima_show_template_digest_ng}, {.field_id = "modsig", .field_init = ima_eventmodsig_init, .field_show = ima_show_template_sig}, + {.field_id = "evmsig", .field_init = ima_eventevmsig_init, + .field_show = ima_show_template_sig}, }; /* diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c index c022ee9e2a4e..90040fac150b 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ */ #include "ima_template_lib.h" +#include static bool ima_template_hash_algo_allowed(u8 algo) { @@ -438,7 +439,7 @@ int ima_eventsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value = event_data->xattr_value; if ((!xattr_value) || (xattr_value->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)) - return 0; + return ima_eventevmsig_init(event_data, field_data); return ima_write_template_field_data(xattr_value, event_data->xattr_len, DATA_FMT_HEX, field_data); @@ -484,3 +485,32 @@ int ima_eventmodsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, return ima_write_template_field_data(data, data_len, DATA_FMT_HEX, field_data); } + +/* + * ima_eventevmsig_init - include the EVM portable signature as part of the + * template data + */ +int ima_eventevmsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, + struct ima_field_data *field_data) +{ + struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_data = NULL; + int rc = 0; + + if (!event_data->file) + return 0; + + rc = vfs_getxattr_alloc(file_dentry(event_data->file), XATTR_NAME_EVM, + (char **)&xattr_data, 0, GFP_NOFS); + if (rc <= 0) + return 0; + + if (xattr_data->type != EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG) { + kfree(xattr_data); + return 0; + } + + rc = ima_write_template_field_data((char *)xattr_data, rc, DATA_FMT_HEX, + field_data); + kfree(xattr_data); + return rc; +} diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h index 6b3b880637a0..f4b2a2056d1d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h @@ -46,4 +46,6 @@ int ima_eventbuf_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct ima_field_data *field_data); int ima_eventmodsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct ima_field_data *field_data); +int ima_eventevmsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, + struct ima_field_data *field_data); #endif /* __LINUX_IMA_TEMPLATE_LIB_H */ From patchwork Wed Nov 11 09:23:02 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 11897265 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E160B921 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BA220759 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726536AbgKKJ03 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:26:29 -0500 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2092 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726136AbgKKJ03 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:26:29 -0500 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWK7z0xjbz67KnT; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:25:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-HP-EliteDesk-800-G2-DM-65W.huawei.com (10.204.65.161) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:26:26 +0100 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v3 11/11] ima: Don't remove security.ima if file must not be appraised Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:23:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20201111092302.1589-12-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.GIT In-Reply-To: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20201111092302.1589-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.65.161] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.86) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Files might come from a remote source and might have xattrs, including security.ima. It should not be IMA task to decide whether security.ima should be kept or not. This patch removes the removexattr() system call in ima_inode_post_setattr(). Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 00b038941a10..f03cb4b7270d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -529,8 +529,6 @@ void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry) return; action = ima_must_appraise(inode, MAY_ACCESS, POST_SETATTR); - if (!action) - __vfs_removexattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA); iint = integrity_iint_find(inode); if (iint) { set_bit(IMA_CHANGE_ATTR, &iint->atomic_flags);