From patchwork Tue Nov 17 08:26:36 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= X-Patchwork-Id: 11911699 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860ADC5519F for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7902467A for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="RSih97Qg" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727108AbgKQI1A (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:27:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42242 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726982AbgKQI1A (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:27:00 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x444.google.com (mail-pf1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::444]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0ABDC0613CF; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:26:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x444.google.com with SMTP id w14so16824241pfd.7; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:26:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=thC0vwUoC+dS5Z/fyfQ4HgfqnUUZ2rF5Qe//4cJ/e/s=; b=RSih97Qg5lNmEj0m87IY+niwHqXQAIC0ruEFGfQ30wLErhKzhrQ/CxWBfri5UoFeld Gim6tHlV6PtmyWAhIqA3IPrcXvEuQKObM42h1lCx3Ig5eMwhemVLyVXlXGYPNlv+QtiW GP7RbKgbLDoi34rHR4sn6rA7LydveHF5Ct2mJ/nlCJNyjvJTbn+BsihXINkZVHhsJgU9 DdU6Nu5+Q7G8KvUDixsnqLHkbTbvc3dzrf8XHGmYNMhdC+b1DsvkI6Nq9N3om+PMNOKr tsAg+hvHCONXRTybQAwlqJ2ZlFGlzw4zs7UWeCJsor4+3V60Ud6WRhs1epEDwUYt916a i1qg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=thC0vwUoC+dS5Z/fyfQ4HgfqnUUZ2rF5Qe//4cJ/e/s=; b=fWzlVbOctZvdBLLjRWecsR3Q2p2I1lybQIevTTy/+2szTyPcMi2CD1DUUwN9tj1zYm 44GXzD9TyBocgtTWt7TOy4PVZo1qNxvdEGsvN8R/ztiTgA9Ux+3RnT/V8BvNYXJOAybJ CIVSASwG4JFoO62fos4FzZeWG3bFsI2sjtRmC4KJ0C5EvhfRGU4m+cSEWNDJQlqqHFiS k/Y0Jkeilp7nB4wvSrQoLVMa9QPx7h4tpyTSykrN4FmXTm1D4G9A15FqLIHu4rwTeKny x88v4MDcBMx955w1pZX6Zqzy+FJsiv4QwnJ1VNZM2/SWnIxHeQkBnUP61dZpnDoPkTd3 soZw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Ri8ep766SAT3se3q05+3Nr+hh/hTky3rVVleAMiF8gv8KbbLa /ioqIF6d88rmFURvKjPCbQ8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHbpYcDC4CrF1mzIpvea+B1cveoQuoSptG8JPZ/wuGPZ8c47r1CEbwD7dwW7n1FDA6IsIGyQ== X-Received: by 2002:a65:5948:: with SMTP id g8mr2607912pgu.51.1605601619614; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:26:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from btopel-mobl.ger.intel.com ([192.55.54.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c12sm2251671pjs.8.2020.11.17.00.26.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:26:58 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , xi.wang@gmail.com, luke.r.nels@gmail.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: Fix broken riscv build Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:26:36 +0100 Message-Id: <20201117082638.43675-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20201117082638.43675-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> References: <20201117082638.43675-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net The selftests/bpf Makefile includes system include directories from the host, when building BPF programs. On RISC-V glibc requires that __riscv_xlen is defined. This is not the case for "clang -target bpf", which messes up __WORDSIZE (errno.h -> ... -> wordsize.h) and breaks the build. By explicitly defining __risc_xlen correctly for riscv, we can workaround this. Fixes: 167381f3eac0 ("selftests/bpf: Makefile fix "missing" headers on build with -idirafter") Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile index c1708ffa6b1c..9d48769ad268 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile @@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ $(RESOLVE_BTFIDS): $(BPFOBJ) | $(BUILD_DIR)/resolve_btfids \ # build would have failed anyways. define get_sys_includes $(shell $(1) -v -E - &1 \ - | sed -n '/<...> search starts here:/,/End of search list./{ s| \(/.*\)|-idirafter \1|p }') + | sed -n '/<...> search starts here:/,/End of search list./{ s| \(/.*\)|-idirafter \1|p }') \ + $(shell $(1) -dM -E - X-Patchwork-Id: 11911701 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BB1C6379D for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F54E2465E for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="F/JGC0VA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727161AbgKQI1H (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:27:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42258 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726982AbgKQI1G (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:27:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x641.google.com (mail-pl1-x641.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::641]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 206A8C0613CF; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x641.google.com with SMTP id t18so9861155plo.0; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4RoQLFT/+eItTFwja6y027jS+o5vx3tn2+htvfb2XHI=; b=F/JGC0VADO/Zkv17DSC1GpV8jvX6fOTghRA7nki52tR9Bvi9uy666TwzjJsxx0nD4A EEuPltsjDVJ8otN1fS/idx+z49ZybWtexgfmTcCL6WLufsl8d1viun33dYPO22wfW7z+ C94awmkBY0tOqczBNpMBcp9N+g0i1LJ7LxzYH0gJkI7hPUqgUYbN4UBEuQG3nzJnrXn6 p7puBQ6ZOIWcuXtTTKmsEAEXwwhWQXvTsFtGo32CznUIhoHaeHSd7NB1Ea/3zLv3dUT4 Vpta0jVsHA2cOtpkUb//dOV2r6keIv2kPdg7j7W4WXVp3wtYYbPlrdO6OKC/EabDOcSA iYmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4RoQLFT/+eItTFwja6y027jS+o5vx3tn2+htvfb2XHI=; b=ohw2EJEtmqtbhUSv2rY23W8LrF3hWY9AGF6UFZ1AsOPihTtDJUpd8EzDktqYOrGZZm D8uyqefk78bkK6YEznrVkESOo3KXkw4p3ThvHO83C/kjtBqwyms8DG3GbhJJjCNUa7rn dmlFCUFOR8yqj8s9No678USC8AvMo41XTybvgIrWapztJtABQUImTMDvsiz2OWEeWXSG Ykpdl1ZnvqUstBqinCEw0tZxsacm1PPOA62lzvN2iqGtTsQ45OjSs6Z/GSxSph+8MkXF lAvF4trqIWDpPzSK5oLrsmKy4vcVaAOdrrhRJ3PeYwSnulpxukf2BfXiFCYC2xavtYDl V1OQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jiniTP0ABsCIHiWnL/btnTfew6gFjihPb6gCNsuy9YM9qwrBf LtjNj5ErUOqWK46IQRKQHMM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqgTFOxPVF4aRIqK+S7JI590qSI1cXqhmcFDMyexvmvVG50FTocYDPRQKCwW2vNkmhOQ20bg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a84:b029:d6:eaef:4806 with SMTP id w4-20020a1709029a84b02900d6eaef4806mr16375125plp.82.1605601624721; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from btopel-mobl.ger.intel.com ([192.55.54.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c12sm2251671pjs.8.2020.11.17.00.27.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:03 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , xi.wang@gmail.com, luke.r.nels@gmail.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Avoid running unprivileged tests with alignment requirements Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:26:37 +0100 Message-Id: <20201117082638.43675-3-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20201117082638.43675-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> References: <20201117082638.43675-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Some architectures have strict alignment requirements. In that case, the BPF verifier detects if a program has unaligned accesses and rejects them. A user can pass BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT to a program to override this check. That, however, will only work when a privileged user loads a program. A unprivileged user loading a program with this flag will be rejected prior entering the verifier. Hence, it does not make sense to load unprivileged programs without strict alignment when testing the verifier. This patch avoids exactly that. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 9be395d9dc64..2075f6a98813 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -1152,9 +1152,15 @@ static void get_unpriv_disabled() static bool test_as_unpriv(struct bpf_test *test) { - return !test->prog_type || - test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER || - test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB; + bool req_aligned = false; + +#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS + req_aligned = test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS; +#endif + return (!test->prog_type || + test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER || + test->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB) && + !req_aligned; } static int do_test(bool unpriv, unsigned int from, unsigned int to) From patchwork Tue Nov 17 08:26:38 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= X-Patchwork-Id: 11911703 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73607C6379F for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DCE2468E for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Vl4FdewX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727180AbgKQI1K (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:27:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42270 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726982AbgKQI1K (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:27:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A646C0613CF; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id oc3so43505pjb.4; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0w+Bq27/X0GIM1BI/NmY3YCnW8k8aSVxxtLiS5VSHa4=; b=Vl4FdewX3/qjsY+5i8oCei0lR1IhFvHmLxRKBQdOvYK/A1LBq73lxnEW0aMdhSRyhQ ZJXTzWbPyGQAu5e7eb9LyiymBuZ5rFVqzyH5FGaW7M/3YWhcbR+QmseDLrmtqkKA+MAf jbzI7OIews82d9lXzcAlpOLksHU2A1qs8twFVSwmnVNDjHYtfN1cb2kAiuDKYgGjDRMg aDulsNkjtPjIPtNN0dhcd2A+91OlcbWcQqgjTUxeJvN5GdyLSG4uXiCK1k3YLYDHiYTo x+MCXum3b/tKQhXSxF/0EMuy9j0joq0dbI5ramufU7hNvD1NGgaUqUP8kBu5oGM5KpnA EDFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0w+Bq27/X0GIM1BI/NmY3YCnW8k8aSVxxtLiS5VSHa4=; b=AW6eIh77HoCqScfG9lNhgSOMqbdpVR3ihJxlpLeMVYe1/0wS2S/uCTT/dPhcQWQxNS ipxsFERTJaAJI3vltNmbjs/DfS6JYrTs47KaAl8T65IuntZc+PocSQ9m+/UwD1C+OQaR SAvCRKrA2TLq5KBsANe21JN20/FIJ9Qp/3KfItdyC1QVNo7zSFdO49WrPXEouT8EVfsc l/ZpjLzKBCdkysbt5IlSqthYgM5xghPw8WvMIyQ3oOZp+xkjj0YyPgfoWOQDQRT3253V sgXbJxd+TZ8mOmtqxVf08oE1/PCy/n52deVf/U8Ccxd0MhSWyXLAmvgP+gepC/MZZGpX r48A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mh17jCi3QMadDXCaDRYclCUqWwQ2GkewBzFJ2hVWV5vSdiktP hIKhFCIEryARyTgzYEtnTes= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfa0OkA1HWcJiLXPFp5EdZ5ns95AOY+lu07uAWijQqDgGlmiHAiCac0tIGDqtfSe7yIGujKQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3506:: with SMTP id ls6mr3424114pjb.202.1605601629510; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from btopel-mobl.ger.intel.com ([192.55.54.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c12sm2251671pjs.8.2020.11.17.00.27.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:27:08 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , xi.wang@gmail.com, luke.r.nels@gmail.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Mark tests that require unaligned memory access Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:26:38 +0100 Message-Id: <20201117082638.43675-4-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20201117082638.43675-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> References: <20201117082638.43675-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net A lot of tests require unaligned memory access to work. Mark the tests as such, so that they can be avoided on unsupported architectures such as RISC-V. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel --- .../selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c | 7 +++ .../bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c | 3 ++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c | 4 ++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c | 8 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c | 46 +++++++++++-------- 7 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c index 2ad5f974451c..fb13ca2d5606 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup remote_ip4 field", @@ -292,6 +293,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup remote_port field", @@ -305,6 +307,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup local_ip4 field", @@ -331,6 +334,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup local_port field", @@ -344,6 +348,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, /* invalid 1,2,4-byte reads from 8-byte fields in bpf_sk_lookup */ { @@ -410,6 +415,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "invalid 4-byte unaligned read from bpf_sk_lookup at even offset", @@ -422,6 +428,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP, .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, /* in-bound and out-of-bound writes to bpf_sk_lookup */ { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c index 988f46a1a4c7..c0648dc009b5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_value_access.c @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "R1 min value is outside of the allowed memory range", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct map access, write test 7", @@ -195,6 +196,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1, 3 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=47 size=2", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct map access, write test 17", @@ -209,6 +211,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1, 3 }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=47 size=2", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "direct map access, write test 18", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c index 637f9293bda8..b117bdd3806d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_ptr.c @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ .errstr_unpriv = "bpf_array access is allowed only to CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN", .result = REJECT, .errstr = "cannot access ptr member ops with moff 0 in struct bpf_map with off 1 size 4", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "bpf_map_ptr: read ops field accepted", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c index 95b5d70a1dc1..2978fb5a769d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_tp_writable.c @@ -31,4 +31,5 @@ .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1, }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE, .errstr = "R6 invalid variable buffer offset: off=0, var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c index 006b5bd99c08..3b6ee009c00b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c @@ -675,6 +675,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_sk_fullsock() after release", @@ -698,6 +699,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_sk_fullsock(tp) after release", @@ -725,6 +727,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use sk after bpf_sk_release(tp)", @@ -747,6 +750,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid mem access", + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "reference tracking: use ptr from bpf_get_listener_sock() after bpf_sk_release(sk)", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c index 4ad7e05de706..bb0dd89dd212 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/regalloc.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc negative", @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc src_reg negative", @@ -97,6 +99,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=44 size=8", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc and spill", @@ -126,6 +129,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc and spill negative", @@ -156,6 +160,7 @@ .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=48 size=8", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc three regs", @@ -182,6 +187,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc after call", @@ -210,6 +216,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc in callee", @@ -240,6 +247,7 @@ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 4 }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, { "regalloc, spill, JEQ", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c index ccade9312d21..55af248efa93 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/wide_access.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(field, off, res, err) \ +#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(field, off, res, err, flgs) \ { \ "wide store to bpf_sock_addr." #field "[" #off "]", \ .insns = { \ @@ -11,31 +11,36 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, \ .expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, \ .errstr = err, \ + .flags = flgs, \ } /* user_ip6[0] is u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 0, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 1, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 2, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(user_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), /* msg_src_ip6[0] is _not_ u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 0, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 1, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 2, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8", 0), #undef BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE -#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(field, off, res, err) \ +#define BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(field, off, res, err, flgs) \ { \ "wide load from bpf_sock_addr." #field "[" #off "]", \ .insns = { \ @@ -48,26 +53,31 @@ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_STORE(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, \ .expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, \ .errstr = err, \ + .flags = flgs, \ } /* user_ip6[0] is u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 0, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 1, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=12 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 2, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(user_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=20 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), /* msg_src_ip6[0] is _not_ u64 aligned */ BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 0, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=44 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 1, ACCEPT, - NULL), + NULL, 0), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 2, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=52 size=8", + F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS), BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD(msg_src_ip6, 3, REJECT, - "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8"), + "invalid bpf_context access off=56 size=8", 0), #undef BPF_SOCK_ADDR_LOAD