From patchwork Tue Jan 12 18:12:28 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Manuel Bouyer X-Patchwork-Id: 12014419 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441EEC433E6 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDACD2311A for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:19:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EDACD2311A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=antioche.eu.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.65874.116798 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOGI-000572-3p; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:19:22 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 65874.116798; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:19:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOGH-00056t-Vc; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:19:21 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 65874; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:19:20 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kzOB6-0003Yo-UE for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:14:00 +0000 Received: from isis.lip6.fr (unknown [2001:660:3302:283c::2]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id daf962e1-e655-4aeb-a74b-a397aa52de59; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asim.lip6.fr (asim.lip6.fr [132.227.86.2]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 10CIDOm0018700; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:13:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from armandeche.soc.lip6.fr (armandeche [132.227.63.133]) by asim.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 10CIDNwJ021031; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:13:23 +0100 (MET) Received: by armandeche.soc.lip6.fr (Postfix, from userid 20331) id 1995D7218; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:13:23 +0100 (MET) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: daf962e1-e655-4aeb-a74b-a397aa52de59 From: Manuel Bouyer To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Manuel Bouyer , Elena Ufimtseva , Ian Jackson , Wei Liu Subject: [PATCH] gdbsx: use right path for privcmd Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:12:28 +0100 Message-Id: <20210112181242.1570-8-bouyer@antioche.eu.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20210112181242.1570-1-bouyer@antioche.eu.org> References: <20210112181242.1570-1-bouyer@antioche.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:13:24 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 From: Manuel Bouyer On NetBSD the privcmd interface node is /kern/xen/privcmd Signed-off-by: Manuel Bouyer Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné --- tools/debugger/gdbsx/xg/xg_main.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/debugger/gdbsx/xg/xg_main.c b/tools/debugger/gdbsx/xg/xg_main.c index ce95648e7e..83a009c195 100644 --- a/tools/debugger/gdbsx/xg/xg_main.c +++ b/tools/debugger/gdbsx/xg/xg_main.c @@ -130,11 +130,11 @@ xg_init() int flags, saved_errno; XGTRC("E\n"); - if ((_dom0_fd=open("/dev/xen/privcmd", O_RDWR)) == -1) { - if ((_dom0_fd=open("/proc/xen/privcmd", O_RDWR)) == -1) { - perror("Failed to open /dev/xen/privcmd or /proc/xen/privcmd\n"); - return -1; - } + if ((_dom0_fd=open("/dev/xen/privcmd", O_RDWR)) == -1 && + (_dom0_fd=open("/proc/xen/privcmd", O_RDWR)) == -1 && + (_dom0_fd=open("/kern/xen/privcmd", O_RDWR)) == -1) { + perror("Failed to open /dev/xen/privcmd or /proc/xen/privcmd or /kern/xen/privcmd\n"); + return -1; } /* Although we return the file handle as the 'xc handle' the API * does not specify / guarentee that this integer is in fact