From patchwork Tue Jan 26 13:40:56 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Vincenzo Frascino X-Patchwork-Id: 12046607 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC68C433E9 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5890229C9 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:43:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A5890229C9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=zjHY4EdNMd/4sq8yulXrtTz7od2IJBkix3v4ojT57zw=; b=mScyb4Dg6VKay9uQCWrEBjb2C+ puTSkw/8ytBxiT4H0wQNet+8olR//sP8JTOHEQb+m6/XRoQ9TGWRiyiDyGfqtK8ERYc/PlOAPLQPu xxsB+L0/uzzoE77/q1BEwYNdgtDInKw0VEm2ZLupHTeV6ObnuNs1OleqHVyK+hNrmMnYe7QBFaTwu ++8zecXJ9xIXHIMI2J2ABtArhJsfSlP8oHu1CZBFyCNXJzBEDvXQvrzSf/JuQTeRx1yfBy13z1gDw VeoO+0ozxRLjICcXENXF2j00ntpsN9eGS9wo9+SbfviJ8UznONNox8JxnG63fAGx14xZotekpN7V7 PmBxqdWg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l4Ob8-0001Wk-FZ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:41:34 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l4Ob5-0001W8-BL for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:41:32 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623C831B; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:41:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from e119884-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e119884-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.72]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45C933F68F; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:41:23 -0800 (PST) From: Vincenzo Frascino To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix kernel address detection of __is_lm_address() Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:40:56 +0000 Message-Id: <20210126134056.45747-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210126_084131_443515_85E196E5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.56 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Vincenzo Frascino , Will Deacon , stable@vger.kernel.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Currently, the __is_lm_address() check just masks out the top 12 bits of the address, but if they are 0, it still yields a true result. This has as a side effect that virt_addr_valid() returns true even for invalid virtual addresses (e.g. 0x0). Fix the detection checking that it's actually a kernel address starting at PAGE_OFFSET. Fixes: f4693c2716b35 ("arm64: mm: extend linear region for 52-bit VA configurations") Cc: # 5.4.x Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas Acked-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino --- arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h index 18fce223b67b..99d7e1494aaa 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h @@ -247,9 +247,11 @@ static inline const void *__tag_set(const void *addr, u8 tag) /* - * The linear kernel range starts at the bottom of the virtual address space. + * Check whether an arbitrary address is within the linear map, which + * lives in the [PAGE_OFFSET, PAGE_END) interval at the bottom of the + * kernel's TTBR1 address range. */ -#define __is_lm_address(addr) (((u64)(addr) & ~PAGE_OFFSET) < (PAGE_END - PAGE_OFFSET)) +#define __is_lm_address(addr) (((u64)(addr) ^ PAGE_OFFSET) < (PAGE_END - PAGE_OFFSET)) #define __lm_to_phys(addr) (((addr) & ~PAGE_OFFSET) + PHYS_OFFSET) #define __kimg_to_phys(addr) ((addr) - kimage_voffset)