From patchwork Wed Apr 7 15:56:39 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 12188781 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B391BC433ED for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595BA61154 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:59:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 595BA61154 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=iJaKhHTRY7pTc+HqeIpKTO6VrwAT3yYRAKIm+SqJU38=; b=K9tA1yAivUCcB/h8tUCPfznKF mEw3ZXuvQFVYh0bKMi0ALmmjpSbT5+kzswH7WYS46y/ItpLtoJLmPLTyohQmnIlfEEQAP/ooj1Aks 778x9WNaIZ6JU57Q74MVXIjrJOEhM7yoM+HoloyhrabXwvE+CbYeDkmYGzhcZixvaDBNHnT/AQ6w/ oFyX+70/BmtObHe9cmWo02PT1DDHrVOlPToPH6ZqesJO1S1/kolo3ZsRYWEwvuK0kk0W0OD46FIjX ustjdRYg9pCTy49Jd4zhZ6QvS83cpzxtHEj/kohz0GQBzQtAM7s7TiauZ2wZmdFzo+ggyHMewzrLd LMXnDt0Bg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lUAYB-005M6n-DY; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:57:03 +0000 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lUAY2-005M4a-KV for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:56:56 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 137FuqL4071603; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1617811012; bh=Jgds5zewRhcnEp12jeYpJsxNje/XJJuE5lRZxJltew0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=MVag6pSDYAkWmwLCMGTlHLHrkeTE6WROGpAM7AlzQgDa6t0I10i2mUgs1c3jp+eZe ZierZZrHcetUgm2dHY87u4Qkn9DWwApiWp2eDjXvfsl/F+NagN1kAhk7fx7szATioi AcyA3kuONytxtfyXFy6ONYW717OxZdnvv+YUHbAY= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 137Fuqgq071567 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:52 -0500 Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:52 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:52 -0500 Received: from lelv0597.itg.ti.com (lelv0597.itg.ti.com [10.181.64.32]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 137FuqKZ041650; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:52 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.37.105]) by lelv0597.itg.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 137Fuq6o075244; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:52 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier CC: Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Jan Kiszka , Vignesh Raghavendra , Lokesh Vutla , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] remoteproc: pru: Fixup interrupt-parent logic for fw events Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:39 -0500 Message-ID: <20210407155641.5501-2-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 In-Reply-To: <20210407155641.5501-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20210407155641.5501-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210407_165655_039450_023E1918 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.37 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The PRU firmware interrupt mapping logic in pru_handle_intrmap() uses of_irq_find_parent() with PRU device node to get a handle to the PRUSS Interrupt Controller at present. This logic however requires that the PRU nodes always define a interrupt-parent property. This property is neither a required/defined property as per the PRU remoteproc binding, nor is relevant from a DT node point of view without any associated interrupts. The current logic finds a wrong interrupt controller and fails to perform proper mapping without any interrupt-parent property in the PRU nodes. Fix this logic to always find and use the sibling interrupt controller. Also, while at this, fix the acquired interrupt controller device node reference properly. Fixes: c75c9fdac66e ("remoteproc: pru: Add support for PRU specific interrupt configuration") Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v2: - Fixed one minor typo ((%s/curret/current) in patch description - Picked up Reviewed-by tag v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20210323223839.17464-2-s-anna@ti.com/ drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c index 16979c1cd2f4..a9d07c0751be 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static int pru_handle_intrmap(struct rproc *rproc) struct pru_rproc *pru = rproc->priv; struct pru_irq_rsc *rsc = pru->pru_interrupt_map; struct irq_fwspec fwspec; - struct device_node *irq_parent; + struct device_node *parent, *irq_parent; int i, ret = 0; /* not having pru_interrupt_map is not an error */ @@ -312,9 +312,16 @@ static int pru_handle_intrmap(struct rproc *rproc) /* * parse and fill in system event to interrupt channel and - * channel-to-host mapping + * channel-to-host mapping. The interrupt controller to be used + * for these mappings for a given PRU remoteproc is always its + * corresponding sibling PRUSS INTC node. */ - irq_parent = of_irq_find_parent(pru->dev->of_node); + parent = of_get_parent(dev_of_node(pru->dev)); + if (!parent) + return -ENODEV; + + irq_parent = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "interrupt-controller"); + of_node_put(parent); if (!irq_parent) { kfree(pru->mapped_irq); return -ENODEV; @@ -337,11 +344,13 @@ static int pru_handle_intrmap(struct rproc *rproc) goto map_fail; } } + of_node_put(irq_parent); return ret; map_fail: pru_dispose_irq_mapping(pru); + of_node_put(irq_parent); return ret; } From patchwork Wed Apr 7 15:56:40 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 12188783 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0883BC433B4 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A40B061279 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:59:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A40B061279 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=4qLXPb0O9m4/tY7mauKenFlolaiW7qYFeZv6gGWfC0E=; b=WqR+XlFOtz9/ib7xjk05KXi3+ O1DzSqpXRefvPXSe96XPxFzH3JDkAmKst6hI/UqqcIKydvs1shRMvkYIfEllP/BGUnfuqN1kjZqEv HA3dBqHohPskNUp1F5f3OO5xCCus5gxAuIq7LLbTsL711lebguXMvdlfXr0WnfkxYCKpQ7e+S34KN hiERsuEigFY6lT0vij4fQDDyxtYFCcz4i5zlK+Zetz5pm4V9HDNryPgmaVNSLet13nADH+Uf77PGW F0SAPjBRk79iA8HuzMz65T2FM0pLsD0JGjR3Xox7ImI1h6ZN3zJviR0zQkG8Ea5XEZL3T1H1mG+XI FQ46zh1PQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lUAYO-005M9Z-CD; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:57:16 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lUAY7-005M5j-3I for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:57:01 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 137Fuv2M116694; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1617811017; bh=lOwAl47wlPJVft+vfoxzycwCK0HQrG3UgumGfK8Po28=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=KNtSgeq3aa588FmSwv19JSBiEhzJZpsLe4s5FO8io2vutKBzIiFU9YuIEoOLbomUx r7ehHeJVRnkH7cPh+D/3wbXfCHlHt2Zrg2ercYdZyrwGUgJq/8ao8PXDLNmfbJ2jCU iMi2evWA/FY4Xl65mlTSk6S0Oqr4/n4Bcswe7F1o= Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (dlee110.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.21]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 137FuvrE045267 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 137FuvV9112804; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.37.105]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 137Fuv7D101689; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier CC: Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Jan Kiszka , Vignesh Raghavendra , Lokesh Vutla , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] remoteproc: pru: Fix wrong success return value for fw events Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20210407155641.5501-3-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 In-Reply-To: <20210407155641.5501-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20210407155641.5501-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210407_165659_479052_4AC1821A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The irq_create_fwspec_mapping() returns a proper virq value on success and 0 upon any failure. The pru_handle_intrmap() treats this as an error and disposes all firmware event mappings correctly, but is returning this incorrect value as is, letting the pru_rproc_start() interpret it as a success and boot the PRU. Fix this by returning an error value back upon any such failure. While at this, revise the error trace to print some meaningful info about the failed event. Fixes: c75c9fdac66e ("remoteproc: pru: Add support for PRU specific interrupt configuration") Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v2: - No changes, picked up Reviewed-by tag v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20210323223839.17464-3-s-anna@ti.com/ drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c index a9d07c0751be..87b43976c51b 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c @@ -339,8 +339,10 @@ static int pru_handle_intrmap(struct rproc *rproc) pru->mapped_irq[i] = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec); if (!pru->mapped_irq[i]) { - dev_err(dev, "failed to get virq\n"); - ret = pru->mapped_irq[i]; + dev_err(dev, "failed to get virq for fw mapping %d: event %d chnl %d host %d\n", + i, fwspec.param[0], fwspec.param[1], + fwspec.param[2]); + ret = -EINVAL; goto map_fail; } } From patchwork Wed Apr 7 15:56:41 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Suman Anna X-Patchwork-Id: 12188785 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3619EC433B4 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C654561154 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:59:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C654561154 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=l8Gf1LMsaz56R2K8SAVrRqqmrWSi5bRTe5PmlFEdkbA=; b=QKMlqzkunXgefCdT09X4KSU8U y7/xLeAU76rlijL5ryvWTcXNeqaDyo1ByVgKA6a2u7Hofse2Esa67fOH+UKgwoOfco3z73bYegrId lT41oXddfKZjJZZqjJLYR33inRhdZKW7NgdsKSChZBqD2RaWZUM60S7bAbrI1pmzRUezeJ8VYXHvZ g46rRDKMPV80SwH7SgnO/by3O7fz442gUtE63qYBXhTCpbYeej7TIJavgbRbdKzzpgVGL9neiM24Y 7Hppv8SZFGUDRjPNHDWKNFAtQnX+KiOMCFBtB7upMQAQOK0fq9YGoNFLDFcKfwhZ/Ci5gsDuIDjAt vS6kNzEkw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lUAYX-005MD2-Sh; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:57:26 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lUAY7-005M5q-9s for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:57:01 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 137Fuvgw116698; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1617811017; bh=D1uTZ8PJxXWfw+lIGtWEx/obgfLqJBnOltn3mYjLZdk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=XwZLGecHafCwwNMnfItyXJhrDyeHD1ZtobH01R+bwc2Lk6/sMd6JjHMTCtZja5xnt JuVR+YUxLK8tcgDWp219YKBt2G/sJ9qBLekmXVB/HINerOkG+fawySBgTzIqtrZWAq 54yslWZeInxJK/iGsMByc4CriQeHTaPbcIcegKaA= Received: from DLEE109.ent.ti.com (dlee109.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.41]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 137FuvMX047528 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) by DLEE109.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 137FuvTT041737; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.37.105]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 137FuvKb101693; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:57 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier CC: Grzegorz Jaszczyk , Jan Kiszka , Vignesh Raghavendra , Lokesh Vutla , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] remoteproc: pru: Fix and cleanup firmware interrupt mapping logic Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 10:56:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20210407155641.5501-4-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 In-Reply-To: <20210407155641.5501-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20210407155641.5501-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210407_165659_774806_8AF03763 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.72 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org The PRU firmware interrupt mappings are configured and unconfigured in .start() and .stop() callbacks respectively using the variables 'evt_count' and a 'mapped_irq' pointer. These variables are modified only during these callbacks but are not re-initialized/reset properly during unwind or failure paths. These stale values caused a kernel crash while stopping a PRU remoteproc running a different firmware with no events on a subsequent run after a previous run that was running a firmware with events. Fix this crash by ensuring that the evt_count is 0 and the mapped_irq pointer is set to NULL in pru_dispose_irq_mapping(). Also, reset these variables properly during any failures in the .start() callback. While at this, the pru_dispose_irq_mapping() callsites are all made to look the same, moving any conditional logic to inside the function. Fixes: c75c9fdac66e ("remoteproc: pru: Add support for PRU specific interrupt configuration") Reported-by: Vignesh Raghavendra Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier --- v2: - Fixed two additional cleanup paths in pru_handle_intrmap() addressing Mathieu's review comment v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20210323223839.17464-4-s-anna@ti.com/ drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c index 87b43976c51b..04863bf23db8 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/pru_rproc.c @@ -266,12 +266,17 @@ static void pru_rproc_create_debug_entries(struct rproc *rproc) static void pru_dispose_irq_mapping(struct pru_rproc *pru) { - while (pru->evt_count--) { + if (!pru->mapped_irq) + return; + + while (pru->evt_count) { + pru->evt_count--; if (pru->mapped_irq[pru->evt_count] > 0) irq_dispose_mapping(pru->mapped_irq[pru->evt_count]); } kfree(pru->mapped_irq); + pru->mapped_irq = NULL; } /* @@ -307,8 +312,10 @@ static int pru_handle_intrmap(struct rproc *rproc) pru->evt_count = rsc->num_evts; pru->mapped_irq = kcalloc(pru->evt_count, sizeof(unsigned int), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!pru->mapped_irq) + if (!pru->mapped_irq) { + pru->evt_count = 0; return -ENOMEM; + } /* * parse and fill in system event to interrupt channel and @@ -317,13 +324,19 @@ static int pru_handle_intrmap(struct rproc *rproc) * corresponding sibling PRUSS INTC node. */ parent = of_get_parent(dev_of_node(pru->dev)); - if (!parent) + if (!parent) { + kfree(pru->mapped_irq); + pru->mapped_irq = NULL; + pru->evt_count = 0; return -ENODEV; + } irq_parent = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "interrupt-controller"); of_node_put(parent); if (!irq_parent) { kfree(pru->mapped_irq); + pru->mapped_irq = NULL; + pru->evt_count = 0; return -ENODEV; } @@ -398,8 +411,7 @@ static int pru_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) pru_control_write_reg(pru, PRU_CTRL_CTRL, val); /* dispose irq mapping - new firmware can provide new mapping */ - if (pru->mapped_irq) - pru_dispose_irq_mapping(pru); + pru_dispose_irq_mapping(pru); return 0; }