From patchwork Wed May 5 11:29:25 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239771 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D18C43460 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70B261176 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233037AbhEELbC (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:31:02 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3003 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232905AbhEELbB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:31:01 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvS85d7qz6rlXW; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:22:00 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:30:02 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu , Subject: [PATCH v6 01/11] evm: Execute evm_inode_init_security() only when an HMAC key is loaded Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:29:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505112935.1410679-2-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: evm_inode_init_security() requires an HMAC key to calculate the HMAC on initial xattrs provided by LSMs. However, it checks generically whether a key has been loaded, including also public keys, which is not correct as public keys are not suitable to calculate the HMAC. Originally, support for signature verification was introduced to verify a possibly immutable initial ram disk, when no new files are created, and to switch to HMAC for the root filesystem. By that time, an HMAC key should have been loaded and usable to calculate HMACs for new files. More recently support for requiring an HMAC key was removed from the kernel, so that signature verification can be used alone. Since this is a legitimate use case, evm_inode_init_security() should not return an error when no HMAC key has been loaded. This patch fixes this problem by replacing the evm_key_loaded() check with a check of the EVM_INIT_HMAC flag in evm_initialized. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.5.x Fixes: 26ddabfe96b ("evm: enable EVM when X509 certificate is loaded") Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 0de367aaa2d3..7ac5204c8d1f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ void evm_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, int ia_valid) } /* - * evm_inode_init_security - initializes security.evm + * evm_inode_init_security - initializes security.evm HMAC value */ int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *lsm_xattr, @@ -530,7 +530,8 @@ int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, struct evm_xattr *xattr_data; int rc; - if (!evm_key_loaded() || !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattr->name)) + if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) || + !evm_protected_xattr(lsm_xattr->name)) return 0; xattr_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*xattr_data), GFP_NOFS); From patchwork Wed May 5 11:29:26 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239769 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40478C433B4 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAB5610A7 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233019AbhEELbB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:31:01 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3005 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232907AbhEELbB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:31:01 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvNp1QPYz6wkRM; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:19:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:30:02 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v6 02/11] evm: Load EVM key in ima_load_x509() to avoid appraisal Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:29:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505112935.1410679-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: The public builtin keys do not need to be appraised by IMA as the restriction on the IMA/EVM trusted keyrings ensures that a key can be loaded only if it is signed with a key on the builtin or secondary keyrings. However, when evm_load_x509() is called, appraisal is already enabled and a valid IMA signature must be added to the EVM key to pass verification. Since the restriction is applied on both IMA and EVM trusted keyrings, it is safe to disable appraisal also when the EVM key is loaded. This patch calls evm_load_x509() inside ima_load_x509() if CONFIG_IMA_LOAD_X509 is enabled, which crosses the normal IMA and EVM boundary. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/iint.c | 4 +++- security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/iint.c b/security/integrity/iint.c index fca8a9409e4a..8638976f7990 100644 --- a/security/integrity/iint.c +++ b/security/integrity/iint.c @@ -208,7 +208,9 @@ int integrity_kernel_read(struct file *file, loff_t offset, void __init integrity_load_keys(void) { ima_load_x509(); - evm_load_x509(); + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_LOAD_X509)) + evm_load_x509(); } static int __init integrity_fs_init(void) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c index 6e8742916d1d..5076a7d9d23e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c @@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ void __init ima_load_x509(void) ima_policy_flag &= ~unset_flags; integrity_load_x509(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA, CONFIG_IMA_X509_PATH); + + /* load also EVM key to avoid appraisal */ + evm_load_x509(); + ima_policy_flag |= unset_flags; } #endif From patchwork Wed May 5 11:29:27 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239777 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FADC43617 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EF061176 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233064AbhEELbD (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:31:03 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3006 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232967AbhEELbB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:31:01 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvVl3R3hz6yjBC; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:24:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:30:03 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu , Subject: [PATCH v6 03/11] evm: Refuse EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES only if an HMAC key is loaded Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:29:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505112935.1410679-4-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES is an EVM initialization flag that can be set to temporarily disable metadata verification until all xattrs/attrs necessary to verify an EVM portable signature are copied to the file. This flag is cleared when EVM is initialized with an HMAC key, to avoid that the HMAC is calculated on unverified xattrs/attrs. Currently EVM unnecessarily denies setting this flag if EVM is initialized with a public key, which is not a concern as it cannot be used to trust xattrs/attrs updates. This patch removes this limitation. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.16.x Fixes: ae1ba1676b88e ("EVM: Allow userland to permit modification of EVM-protected metadata") Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- Documentation/ABI/testing/evm | 5 +++-- security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c | 5 ++--- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm b/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm index 3c477ba48a31..eb6d70fd6fa2 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/evm @@ -49,8 +49,9 @@ Description: modification of EVM-protected metadata and disable all further modification of policy - Note that once a key has been loaded, it will no longer be - possible to enable metadata modification. + Note that once an HMAC key has been loaded, it will no longer + be possible to enable metadata modification and, if it is + already enabled, it will be disabled. Until key loading has been signaled EVM can not create or validate the 'security.evm' xattr, but returns diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c index bbc85637e18b..860c48b9a0c3 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c @@ -81,11 +81,10 @@ static ssize_t evm_write_key(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, return -EINVAL; /* Don't allow a request to freshly enable metadata writes if - * keys are loaded. + * an HMAC key is loaded. */ if ((i & EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES) && - ((evm_initialized & EVM_KEY_MASK) != 0) && - !(evm_initialized & EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES)) + (evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) != 0) return -EPERM; if (i & EVM_INIT_HMAC) { From patchwork Wed May 5 11:29:28 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239775 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BCEC433ED for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CA5610A7 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232907AbhEELbE (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:31:04 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3007 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232999AbhEELbC (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:31:02 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvSB3M6Nz6rlX5; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:22:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:30:04 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v6 04/11] evm: Introduce evm_status_revalidate() Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:29:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505112935.1410679-5-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: When EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES is set, EVM allows any operation on metadata. Its main purpose is to allow users to freely set metadata when it is protected by a portable signature, until an HMAC key is loaded. However, callers of evm_verifyxattr() are not notified about metadata changes and continue to rely on the last status returned by the function. For example IMA, since it caches the appraisal result, will not call again evm_verifyxattr() until the appraisal flags are cleared, and will grant access to the file even if there was a metadata operation that made the portable signature invalid. This patch introduces evm_status_revalidate(), which callers of evm_verifyxattr() can use in their xattr hooks to determine whether re-validation is necessary and to do the proper actions. IMA calls it in its xattr hooks to reset the appraisal flags, so that the EVM status is re-evaluated after a metadata operation. Lastly, this patch also adds a call to evm_reset_status() in evm_inode_post_setattr() to invalidate the cached EVM status after a setattr operation. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- include/linux/evm.h | 6 +++++ security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++---- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 15 ++++++++---- 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/evm.h b/include/linux/evm.h index 8302bc29bb35..e5b7bcb152b9 100644 --- a/include/linux/evm.h +++ b/include/linux/evm.h @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ extern void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, extern int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, const struct xattr *xattr_array, struct xattr *evm); +extern bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name); #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL extern int posix_xattr_acl(const char *xattrname); #else @@ -104,5 +105,10 @@ static inline int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, return 0; } +static inline bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name) +{ + return false; +} + #endif /* CONFIG_EVM */ #endif /* LINUX_EVM_H */ diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 7ac5204c8d1f..998818283fda 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -425,6 +425,30 @@ static void evm_reset_status(struct inode *inode) iint->evm_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN; } +/** + * evm_status_revalidate - report whether EVM status re-validation is necessary + * @xattr_name: pointer to the affected extended attribute name + * + * Report whether callers of evm_verifyxattr() should re-validate the + * EVM status. + * + * Return true if re-validation is necessary, false otherwise. + */ +bool evm_status_revalidate(const char *xattr_name) +{ + if (!evm_key_loaded()) + return false; + + /* evm_inode_post_setattr() passes NULL */ + if (!xattr_name) + return true; + + if (!evm_protected_xattr(xattr_name) && !posix_xattr_acl(xattr_name)) + return false; + + return true; +} + /** * evm_inode_post_setxattr - update 'security.evm' to reflect the changes * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry @@ -441,8 +465,7 @@ static void evm_reset_status(struct inode *inode) void evm_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) { - if (!evm_key_loaded() || (!evm_protected_xattr(xattr_name) - && !posix_xattr_acl(xattr_name))) + if (!evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) return; evm_reset_status(dentry->d_inode); @@ -462,7 +485,7 @@ void evm_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, */ void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) { - if (!evm_key_loaded() || !evm_protected_xattr(xattr_name)) + if (!evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) return; evm_reset_status(dentry->d_inode); @@ -513,9 +536,11 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) */ void evm_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, int ia_valid) { - if (!evm_key_loaded()) + if (!evm_status_revalidate(NULL)) return; + evm_reset_status(dentry->d_inode); + if (ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID)) evm_update_evmxattr(dentry, NULL, NULL, 0); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 4e5eb0236278..ddac9e727d3a 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -570,6 +570,7 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) { const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xvalue = xattr_value; + int digsig = 0; int result; result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, @@ -577,9 +578,12 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, if (result == 1) { if (!xattr_value_len || (xvalue->type >= IMA_XATTR_LAST)) return -EINVAL; - ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), - xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); - result = 0; + digsig = (xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); + } + if (result == 1 || evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) { + ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), digsig); + if (result == 1) + result = 0; } return result; } @@ -589,9 +593,10 @@ int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) int result; result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0); - if (result == 1) { + if (result == 1 || evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) { ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), 0); - result = 0; + if (result == 1) + result = 0; } return result; } From patchwork Wed May 5 11:33:23 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239791 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61F9C433B4 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC93561176 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232934AbhEELev (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:34:51 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3008 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232854AbhEELeu (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:34:50 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvb82bDYz6yhrR; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:28:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:52 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v6 05/11] evm: Introduce evm_hmac_disabled() to safely ignore verification errors Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505113329.1410943-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: When a file is being created, LSMs can set the initial label with the inode_init_security hook. If no HMAC key is loaded, the new file will have LSM xattrs but not the HMAC. It is also possible that the file remains without protected xattrs after creation if no active LSM provided it. Unfortunately, EVM will deny any further metadata operation on new files, as evm_protect_xattr() will always return the INTEGRITY_NOLABEL error, or INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS if no protected xattrs exist. This would limit the usability of EVM when only a public key is loaded, as commands such as cp or tar with the option to preserve xattrs won't work. This patch introduces the evm_hmac_disabled() function to determine whether or not it is safe to ignore verification errors, based on the ability of EVM to calculate HMACs. If the HMAC key is not loaded, and it cannot be loaded in the future due to the EVM_SETUP_COMPLETE initialization flag, allowing an operation despite the attrs/xattrs being found invalid will not make them valid. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 998818283fda..f625196eee8e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -90,6 +90,24 @@ static bool evm_key_loaded(void) return (bool)(evm_initialized & EVM_KEY_MASK); } +/* + * This function determines whether or not it is safe to ignore verification + * errors, based on the ability of EVM to calculate HMACs. If the HMAC key + * is not loaded, and it cannot be loaded in the future due to the + * EVM_SETUP_COMPLETE initialization flag, allowing an operation despite the + * attrs/xattrs being found invalid will not make them valid. + */ +static bool evm_hmac_disabled(void) +{ + if (evm_initialized & EVM_INIT_HMAC) + return false; + + if (!(evm_initialized & EVM_SETUP_COMPLETE)) + return false; + + return true; +} + static int evm_find_protected_xattrs(struct dentry *dentry) { struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry); @@ -338,6 +356,10 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS) { struct integrity_iint_cache *iint; + /* Exception if the HMAC is not going to be calculated. */ + if (evm_hmac_disabled()) + return 0; + iint = integrity_iint_find(d_backing_inode(dentry)); if (iint && (iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE)) return 0; @@ -354,6 +376,9 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, -EPERM, 0); } out: + /* Exception if the HMAC is not going to be calculated. */ + if (evm_hmac_disabled() && evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) + return 0; if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS) integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", @@ -515,7 +540,8 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) return 0; evm_status = evm_verify_current_integrity(dentry); if ((evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS) || - (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS)) + (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS) || + (evm_hmac_disabled() && evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL)) return 0; integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", From patchwork Wed May 5 11:33:24 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239793 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DA6C43461 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE81461176 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233004AbhEELev (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:34:51 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3009 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232907AbhEELev (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:34:51 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvXb2D6jz6rlTr; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:25:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:52 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v6 06/11] evm: Allow xattr/attr operations for portable signatures Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505113329.1410943-2-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: If files with portable signatures are copied from one location to another or are extracted from an archive, verification can temporarily fail until all xattrs/attrs are set in the destination. Only portable signatures may be moved or copied from one file to another, as they don't depend on system-specific information such as the inode generation. Instead portable signatures must include security.ima. Unlike other security.evm types, EVM portable signatures are also immutable. Thus, it wouldn't be a problem to allow xattr/attr operations when verification fails, as portable signatures will never be replaced with the HMAC on possibly corrupted xattrs/attrs. This patch first introduces a new integrity status called INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE, that allows callers of evm_verify_current_integrity() to detect that a portable signature didn't pass verification and then adds an exception in evm_protect_xattr() and evm_inode_setattr() for this status and returns 0 instead of -EPERM. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- include/linux/integrity.h | 1 + security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++----- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/integrity.h b/include/linux/integrity.h index 2271939c5c31..2ea0f2f65ab6 100644 --- a/include/linux/integrity.h +++ b/include/linux/integrity.h @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ enum integrity_status { INTEGRITY_PASS = 0, INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE, INTEGRITY_FAIL, + INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE, INTEGRITY_NOLABEL, INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS, INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN, diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index f625196eee8e..9faebff029e6 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ int evm_initialized; static const char * const integrity_status_msg[] = { - "pass", "pass_immutable", "fail", "no_label", "no_xattrs", "unknown" + "pass", "pass_immutable", "fail", "fail_immutable", "no_label", + "no_xattrs", "unknown" }; int evm_hmac_attrs; @@ -155,7 +156,7 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, enum integrity_status evm_status = INTEGRITY_PASS; struct evm_digest digest; struct inode *inode; - int rc, xattr_len; + int rc, xattr_len, evm_immutable = 0; if (iint && (iint->evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS || iint->evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE)) @@ -200,8 +201,10 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, if (rc) rc = -EINVAL; break; - case EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG: case EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG: + evm_immutable = 1; + fallthrough; + case EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG: /* accept xattr with non-empty signature field */ if (xattr_len <= sizeof(struct signature_v2_hdr)) { evm_status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; @@ -238,9 +241,14 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_hmac(struct dentry *dentry, break; } - if (rc) - evm_status = (rc == -ENODATA) ? - INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS : INTEGRITY_FAIL; + if (rc) { + if (rc == -ENODATA) + evm_status = INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS; + else if (evm_immutable) + evm_status = INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE; + else + evm_status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; + } out: if (iint) iint->evm_status = evm_status; @@ -379,6 +387,14 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, /* Exception if the HMAC is not going to be calculated. */ if (evm_hmac_disabled() && evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL) return 0; + + /* + * Writing other xattrs is safe for portable signatures, as portable + * signatures are immutable and can never be updated. + */ + if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE) + return 0; + if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS) integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", @@ -539,8 +555,13 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) if (!(ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID))) return 0; evm_status = evm_verify_current_integrity(dentry); + /* + * Writing attrs is safe for portable signatures, as portable signatures + * are immutable and can never be updated. + */ if ((evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS) || (evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS) || + (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE) || (evm_hmac_disabled() && evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL)) return 0; integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index ddac9e727d3a..6d0983a97711 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -416,6 +416,8 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, case INTEGRITY_NOLABEL: /* No security.evm xattr. */ cause = "missing-HMAC"; goto out; + case INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE: + fallthrough; case INTEGRITY_FAIL: /* Invalid HMAC/signature. */ cause = "invalid-HMAC"; goto out; From patchwork Wed May 5 11:33:25 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239795 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD6BC43470 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1266E61176 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233074AbhEELez (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:34:55 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3010 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232909AbhEELev (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:34:51 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvb93cPHz6yhs4; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:28:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:53 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu , Christian Brauner , Andreas Gruenbacher Subject: [PATCH v6 07/11] evm: Pass user namespace to set/remove xattr hooks Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505113329.1410943-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: In preparation for 'evm: Allow setxattr() and setattr() for unmodified metadata', this patch passes mnt_userns to the inode set/remove xattr hooks so that the GID of the inode on an idmapped mount is correctly determined by posix_acl_update_mode(). Cc: Christian Brauner Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner --- include/linux/evm.h | 12 ++++++++---- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 17 +++++++++++------ security/security.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/evm.h b/include/linux/evm.h index e5b7bcb152b9..8cad46bcec9d 100644 --- a/include/linux/evm.h +++ b/include/linux/evm.h @@ -23,13 +23,15 @@ extern enum integrity_status evm_verifyxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint); extern int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr); extern void evm_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, int ia_valid); -extern int evm_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, +extern int evm_inode_setxattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, + struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, const void *value, size_t size); extern void evm_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len); -extern int evm_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name); +extern int evm_inode_removexattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, + struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name); extern void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name); extern int evm_inode_init_security(struct inode *inode, @@ -72,7 +74,8 @@ static inline void evm_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, int ia_valid) return; } -static inline int evm_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, +static inline int evm_inode_setxattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, + struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, const void *value, size_t size) { return 0; @@ -86,7 +89,8 @@ static inline void evm_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, return; } -static inline int evm_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, +static inline int evm_inode_removexattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, + struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) { return 0; diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 9faebff029e6..3745c08c09e6 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -342,7 +342,8 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_current_integrity(struct dentry *dentry) * For posix xattr acls only, permit security.evm, even if it currently * doesn't exist, to be updated unless the EVM signature is immutable. */ -static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, +static int evm_protect_xattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, + struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) { enum integrity_status evm_status; @@ -405,6 +406,7 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, /** * evm_inode_setxattr - protect the EVM extended attribute + * @mnt_userns: user namespace of the idmapped mount * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry * @xattr_name: pointer to the affected extended attribute name * @xattr_value: pointer to the new extended attribute value @@ -416,8 +418,9 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, * userspace from writing HMAC value. Writing 'security.evm' requires * requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileges. */ -int evm_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, - const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) +int evm_inode_setxattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, struct dentry *dentry, + const char *xattr_name, const void *xattr_value, + size_t xattr_value_len) { const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_data = xattr_value; @@ -434,19 +437,21 @@ int evm_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, xattr_data->type != EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG) return -EPERM; } - return evm_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, + return evm_protect_xattr(mnt_userns, dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, xattr_value_len); } /** * evm_inode_removexattr - protect the EVM extended attribute + * @mnt_userns: user namespace of the idmapped mount * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry * @xattr_name: pointer to the affected extended attribute name * * Removing 'security.evm' requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileges and that * the current value is valid. */ -int evm_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) +int evm_inode_removexattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, + struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) { /* Policy permits modification of the protected xattrs even though * there's no HMAC key loaded @@ -454,7 +459,7 @@ int evm_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) if (evm_initialized & EVM_ALLOW_METADATA_WRITES) return 0; - return evm_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0); + return evm_protect_xattr(mnt_userns, dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0); } static void evm_reset_status(struct inode *inode) diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c index b38155b2de83..e9f8010a2341 100644 --- a/security/security.c +++ b/security/security.c @@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ int security_inode_setxattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, ret = ima_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size); if (ret) return ret; - return evm_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size); + return evm_inode_setxattr(mnt_userns, dentry, name, value, size); } void security_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, @@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ int security_inode_removexattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, ret = ima_inode_removexattr(dentry, name); if (ret) return ret; - return evm_inode_removexattr(dentry, name); + return evm_inode_removexattr(mnt_userns, dentry, name); } int security_inode_need_killpriv(struct dentry *dentry) From patchwork Wed May 5 11:33:26 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239797 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D91C43600 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B73613BF for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:34:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233053AbhEELez (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:34:55 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3011 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232995AbhEELew (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:34:52 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvTF3H9hz6wkM4; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:22:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:54 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu , Christian Brauner , Andreas Gruenbacher , kernel test robot Subject: [PATCH v6 08/11] evm: Allow setxattr() and setattr() for unmodified metadata Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505113329.1410943-4-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: With the patch to allow xattr/attr operations if a portable signature verification fails, cp and tar can copy all xattrs/attrs so that at the end of the process verification succeeds. However, it might happen that the xattrs/attrs are already set to the correct value (taken at signing time) and signature verification succeeds before the copy has completed. For example, an archive might contains files owned by root and the archive is extracted by root. Then, since portable signatures are immutable, all subsequent operations fail (e.g. fchown()), even if the operation is legitimate (does not alter the current value). This patch avoids this problem by reporting successful operation to user space when that operation does not alter the current value of xattrs/attrs. Cc: Christian Brauner Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner --- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 3745c08c09e6..793e6556b004 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -330,6 +331,90 @@ static enum integrity_status evm_verify_current_integrity(struct dentry *dentry) return evm_verify_hmac(dentry, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL); } +/* + * evm_xattr_acl_change - check if passed ACL changes the inode mode + * @mnt_userns: user namespace of the idmapped mount + * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry + * @xattr_name: requested xattr + * @xattr_value: requested xattr value + * @xattr_value_len: requested xattr value length + * + * Check if passed ACL changes the inode mode, which is protected by EVM. + * + * Returns 1 if passed ACL causes inode mode change, 0 otherwise. + */ +static int evm_xattr_acl_change(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, + struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL + umode_t mode; + struct posix_acl *acl = NULL, *acl_res; + struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry); + int rc; + + /* user_ns is not relevant here, ACL_USER/ACL_GROUP don't have impact + * on the inode mode (see posix_acl_equiv_mode()). + */ + acl = posix_acl_from_xattr(&init_user_ns, xattr_value, xattr_value_len); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(acl)) + return 1; + + acl_res = acl; + /* Passing mnt_userns is necessary to correctly determine the GID in + * an idmapped mount, as the GID is used to clear the setgid bit in + * the inode mode. + */ + rc = posix_acl_update_mode(mnt_userns, inode, &mode, &acl_res); + + posix_acl_release(acl); + + if (rc) + return 1; + + if (inode->i_mode != mode) + return 1; +#endif + return 0; +} + +/* + * evm_xattr_change - check if passed xattr value differs from current value + * @mnt_userns: user namespace of the idmapped mount + * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry + * @xattr_name: requested xattr + * @xattr_value: requested xattr value + * @xattr_value_len: requested xattr value length + * + * Check if passed xattr value differs from current value. + * + * Returns 1 if passed xattr value differs from current value, 0 otherwise. + */ +static int evm_xattr_change(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, + struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) +{ + char *xattr_data = NULL; + int rc = 0; + + if (posix_xattr_acl(xattr_name)) + return evm_xattr_acl_change(mnt_userns, dentry, xattr_name, + xattr_value, xattr_value_len); + + rc = vfs_getxattr_alloc(&init_user_ns, dentry, xattr_name, &xattr_data, + 0, GFP_NOFS); + if (rc < 0) + return 1; + + if (rc == xattr_value_len) + rc = !!memcmp(xattr_value, xattr_data, rc); + else + rc = 1; + + kfree(xattr_data); + return rc; +} + /* * evm_protect_xattr - protect the EVM extended attribute * @@ -396,7 +481,13 @@ static int evm_protect_xattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE) return 0; - if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS) + if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE && + !evm_xattr_change(mnt_userns, dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, + xattr_value_len)) + return 0; + + if (evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS && + evm_status != INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE) integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", integrity_status_msg[evm_status], @@ -539,6 +630,19 @@ void evm_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) evm_update_evmxattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0); } +static int evm_attr_change(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) +{ + struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry); + unsigned int ia_valid = attr->ia_valid; + + if ((!(ia_valid & ATTR_UID) || uid_eq(attr->ia_uid, inode->i_uid)) && + (!(ia_valid & ATTR_GID) || gid_eq(attr->ia_gid, inode->i_gid)) && + (!(ia_valid & ATTR_MODE) || attr->ia_mode == inode->i_mode)) + return 0; + + return 1; +} + /** * evm_inode_setattr - prevent updating an invalid EVM extended attribute * @dentry: pointer to the affected dentry @@ -569,6 +673,11 @@ int evm_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr) (evm_status == INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE) || (evm_hmac_disabled() && evm_status == INTEGRITY_NOLABEL)) return 0; + + if (evm_status == INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE && + !evm_attr_change(dentry, attr)) + return 0; + integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_METADATA, d_backing_inode(dentry), dentry->d_name.name, "appraise_metadata", integrity_status_msg[evm_status], -EPERM, 0); From patchwork Wed May 5 11:33:27 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239799 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CE6C43460 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F29B6109E for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233088AbhEELe4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:34:56 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3012 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233022AbhEELex (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:34:53 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvbB55dGz6yhpy; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:28:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:54 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v6 09/11] ima: Allow imasig requirement to be satisfied by EVM portable signatures Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505113329.1410943-5-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: System administrators can require that all accessed files have a signature by specifying appraise_type=imasig in a policy rule. Currently, IMA signatures satisfy this requirement. Appended signatures may also satisfy this requirement, but are not applicable as IMA signatures. IMA/appended signatures ensure data source authentication for file content and prevent any change. EVM signatures instead ensure data source authentication for file metadata. Given that the digest or signature of the file content must be included in the metadata, EVM signatures provide the same file data guarantees of IMA signatures, as well as providing file metadata guarantees. This patch lets systems protected with EVM signatures pass appraisal verification if the appraise_type=imasig requirement is specified in the policy. This facilitates deployment in the scenarios where only EVM signatures are available. The patch makes the following changes: file xattr types: security.ima: IMA_XATTR_DIGEST/IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG security.evm: EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG execve(), mmap(), open() behavior (with appraise_type=imasig): before: denied (file without IMA signature, imasig requirement not met) after: allowed (file with EVM portable signature, imasig requirement met) open(O_WRONLY) behavior (without appraise_type=imasig): before: allowed (file without IMA signature, not immutable) after: denied (file with EVM portable signature, immutable) In addition, similarly to IMA signatures, this patch temporarily allows new files without or with incomplete metadata to be opened so that content can be written. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 6d0983a97711..23af45d8ac58 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -242,12 +242,16 @@ static int xattr_verify(enum ima_hooks func, struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, hash_start = 1; fallthrough; case IMA_XATTR_DIGEST: - if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { - *cause = "IMA-signature-required"; - *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; - break; + if (*status != INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE) { + if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) { + *cause = "IMA-signature-required"; + *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL; + break; + } + clear_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); + } else { + set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); } - clear_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); if (xattr_len - sizeof(xattr_value->type) - hash_start >= iint->ima_hash->length) /* @@ -417,6 +421,7 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, cause = "missing-HMAC"; goto out; case INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE: + set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags); fallthrough; case INTEGRITY_FAIL: /* Invalid HMAC/signature. */ cause = "invalid-HMAC"; @@ -461,9 +466,12 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, status = INTEGRITY_PASS; } - /* Permit new files with file signatures, but without data. */ + /* + * Permit new files with file/EVM portable signatures, but + * without data. + */ if (inode->i_size == 0 && iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE && - xattr_value && xattr_value->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG) { + test_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags)) { status = INTEGRITY_PASS; } @@ -581,6 +589,8 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, if (!xattr_value_len || (xvalue->type >= IMA_XATTR_LAST)) return -EINVAL; digsig = (xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); + } else if (!strcmp(xattr_name, XATTR_NAME_EVM) && xattr_value_len > 0) { + digsig = (xvalue->type == EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG); } if (result == 1 || evm_status_revalidate(xattr_name)) { ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), digsig); From patchwork Wed May 5 11:33:28 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239801 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CEDC433ED for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005ED6109E for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233002AbhEELgI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:36:08 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3013 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232993AbhEELgH (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:36:07 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvVh60b6z6wkQf; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:24:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:35:09 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v6 10/11] ima: Introduce template field evmsig and write to field sig as fallback Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505113329.1410943-6-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: With the patch to accept EVM portable signatures when the appraise_type=imasig requirement is specified in the policy, appraisal can be successfully done even if the file does not have an IMA signature. However, remote attestation would not see that a different signature type was used, as only IMA signatures can be included in the measurement list. This patch solves the issue by introducing the new template field 'evmsig' to show EVM portable signatures and by including its value in the existing field 'sig' if the IMA signature is not found. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar --- Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst | 4 ++- security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c | 2 ++ security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++- security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h | 2 ++ 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst b/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst index c5a8432972ef..9f3e86ab028a 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/IMA-templates.rst @@ -70,9 +70,11 @@ descriptors by adding their identifier to the format string prefix is shown only if the hash algorithm is not SHA1 or MD5); - 'd-modsig': the digest of the event without the appended modsig; - 'n-ng': the name of the event, without size limitations; - - 'sig': the file signature; + - 'sig': the file signature, or the EVM portable signature if the file + signature is not found; - 'modsig' the appended file signature; - 'buf': the buffer data that was used to generate the hash without size limitations; + - 'evmsig': the EVM portable signature; Below, there is the list of defined template descriptors: diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c index 4e081e650047..7a60848c04a5 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template.c @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ static const struct ima_template_field supported_fields[] = { .field_show = ima_show_template_digest_ng}, {.field_id = "modsig", .field_init = ima_eventmodsig_init, .field_show = ima_show_template_sig}, + {.field_id = "evmsig", .field_init = ima_eventevmsig_init, + .field_show = ima_show_template_sig}, }; /* diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c index c022ee9e2a4e..4314d9a3514c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ */ #include "ima_template_lib.h" +#include static bool ima_template_hash_algo_allowed(u8 algo) { @@ -438,7 +439,7 @@ int ima_eventsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value = event_data->xattr_value; if ((!xattr_value) || (xattr_value->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)) - return 0; + return ima_eventevmsig_init(event_data, field_data); return ima_write_template_field_data(xattr_value, event_data->xattr_len, DATA_FMT_HEX, field_data); @@ -484,3 +485,33 @@ int ima_eventmodsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, return ima_write_template_field_data(data, data_len, DATA_FMT_HEX, field_data); } + +/* + * ima_eventevmsig_init - include the EVM portable signature as part of the + * template data + */ +int ima_eventevmsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, + struct ima_field_data *field_data) +{ + struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_data = NULL; + int rc = 0; + + if (!event_data->file) + return 0; + + rc = vfs_getxattr_alloc(&init_user_ns, file_dentry(event_data->file), + XATTR_NAME_EVM, (char **)&xattr_data, 0, + GFP_NOFS); + if (rc <= 0) + return 0; + + if (xattr_data->type != EVM_XATTR_PORTABLE_DIGSIG) { + kfree(xattr_data); + return 0; + } + + rc = ima_write_template_field_data((char *)xattr_data, rc, DATA_FMT_HEX, + field_data); + kfree(xattr_data); + return rc; +} diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h index 6b3b880637a0..f4b2a2056d1d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.h @@ -46,4 +46,6 @@ int ima_eventbuf_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct ima_field_data *field_data); int ima_eventmodsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, struct ima_field_data *field_data); +int ima_eventevmsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data, + struct ima_field_data *field_data); #endif /* __LINUX_IMA_TEMPLATE_LIB_H */ From patchwork Wed May 5 11:33:29 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Roberto Sassu X-Patchwork-Id: 12239803 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4A1C43461 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA78C6109E for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233118AbhEELgJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:36:09 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:3014 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232976AbhEELgI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 07:36:08 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FZvVj2cMhz6wkRK; Wed, 5 May 2021 19:24:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:35:10 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , CC: , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v6 11/11] ima: Don't remove security.ima if file must not be appraised Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:33:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20210505113329.1410943-7-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> References: <20210505112935.1410679-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.202) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: Files might come from a remote source and might have xattrs, including security.ima. It should not be IMA task to decide whether security.ima should be kept or not. This patch removes the removexattr() system call in ima_inode_post_setattr(). Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar --- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 23af45d8ac58..e1bd61f76f9e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -532,8 +532,6 @@ void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, return; action = ima_must_appraise(mnt_userns, inode, MAY_ACCESS, POST_SETATTR); - if (!action) - __vfs_removexattr(&init_user_ns, dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA); iint = integrity_iint_find(inode); if (iint) { set_bit(IMA_CHANGE_ATTR, &iint->atomic_flags);