From patchwork Fri May 21 03:01:45 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ilya Leoshkevich X-Patchwork-Id: 12271761 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F08DC433B4 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A646D6108D for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:05:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A646D6108D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:49072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljvTc-0000ru-Gz for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:05:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljvQG-0004uC-0H; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:02:01 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:59424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljvQD-0005TU-D0; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:01:59 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14L31KhU087426; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:01:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=pp1; bh=22m50fiSLeBHOdZdA4sQ34246OSA3gzmLME2W4y6lqs=; b=rx3v4byQPTTxUJenD4s+vZSlrFF6k3cKDkdQPyPDk4eoP9n+YY25W3W81WUdUqTBNS7H ceSH//5IuBueKTq0PFKIbofUpbQM26oL5yH30wtoVP6Gs5U3pSej+0ond4bM9LuPu57Q Vp+12m65FxKjc0mZKqIfZR6NNS5yXSoAeUxHOD1uBJClklQNIvxqcDX2HGLp3BkJsCyN 5HMH578sZ9RFcjXlYlnzjQcICQK5UvNodJHu2DiQIbnRPdXKaKsqzeicwZyoMTZAo/sg 3kOlnaUvIsMU+frS/DXA5JB2fOpaGDi5YDUEsSVyyXxCdGrR5zx/qXrmF0sY/cN0+SLm Aw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38p4kfr0ew-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 May 2021 23:01:54 -0400 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14L31dvH089420; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:01:54 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38p4kfr0dy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 May 2021 23:01:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14L2qUXg000544; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:52 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 38j5jh1md5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:51 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 14L31mkD42074522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:48 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F31A404D; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F398A4040; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vm.lan (unknown [9.145.39.144]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:48 +0000 (GMT) From: Ilya Leoshkevich To: Richard Henderson , David Hildenbrand , Laurent Vivier Subject: [PATCH 1/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL psw.addr reporting Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 05:01:45 +0200 Message-Id: <20210521030146.2831663-2-iii@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210521030146.2831663-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210521030146.2831663-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: N30MkflzXhlATIMVWW26-vlBhCcbTmgk X-Proofpoint-GUID: 8cVdPEWST42dXcjU1dIX8SSbx9zHCaDM X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-21_02:2021-05-20, 2021-05-21 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105210017 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=iii@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -26 X-Spam_score: -2.7 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Christian Borntraeger , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Ilya Leoshkevich , Andreas Krebbel Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" When a s390x CPU attempts to execute an illegal instruction, an operation exception is recognized. This is a suppressing exception, which means that the PSW is advanced by the length of the illegal instruction. On the real hardware or in qemu-system-s390x the kernel then raises SIGILL with si_addr pointing to the suppressed instruction and psw.addr containing the updated PSW. Unfortunately qemu-s390x sets both to the address of the suppressed instruction at the moment. Fix by sharing the PSW advancement logic with qemu-system-s390x and setting si_addr to the address of the instruction that raised the exception. Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1920913 Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand --- linux-user/s390x/cpu_loop.c | 6 +++- target/s390x/excp_helper.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------- target/s390x/internal.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/linux-user/s390x/cpu_loop.c b/linux-user/s390x/cpu_loop.c index f2d1215fb1..6f5462d4f8 100644 --- a/linux-user/s390x/cpu_loop.c +++ b/linux-user/s390x/cpu_loop.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include "qemu-common.h" #include "qemu.h" #include "cpu_loop-common.h" +#include "internal.h" /* s390x masks the fault address it reports in si_addr for SIGSEGV and SIGBUS */ #define S390X_FAIL_ADDR_MASK -4096LL @@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ void cpu_loop(CPUS390XState *env) { CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env); int trapnr, n, sig; + target_ulong excp_psw_addr; target_siginfo_t info; target_ulong addr; abi_long ret; @@ -38,6 +40,7 @@ void cpu_loop(CPUS390XState *env) trapnr = cpu_exec(cs); cpu_exec_end(cs); process_queued_cpu_work(cs); + excp_psw_addr = env->psw.addr; switch (trapnr) { case EXCP_INTERRUPT: @@ -66,6 +69,7 @@ void cpu_loop(CPUS390XState *env) n = TARGET_TRAP_BRKPT; goto do_signal_pc; case EXCP_PGM: + s390_cpu_program_interrupt_advance_psw(env); n = env->int_pgm_code; switch (n) { case PGM_OPERATION: @@ -131,7 +135,7 @@ void cpu_loop(CPUS390XState *env) break; do_signal_pc: - addr = env->psw.addr; + addr = excp_psw_addr; do_signal: info.si_signo = sig; info.si_errno = 0; diff --git a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c index 20625c2c8f..0a323967ae 100644 --- a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c +++ b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c @@ -82,6 +82,42 @@ void HELPER(data_exception)(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t dxc) tcg_s390_data_exception(env, dxc, GETPC()); } +void s390_cpu_program_interrupt_advance_psw(CPUS390XState *env) +{ + switch (env->int_pgm_code) { + case PGM_PER: + if (env->per_perc_atmid & PER_CODE_EVENT_NULLIFICATION) { + break; + } + /* FALL THROUGH */ + case PGM_OPERATION: + case PGM_PRIVILEGED: + case PGM_EXECUTE: + case PGM_PROTECTION: + case PGM_ADDRESSING: + case PGM_SPECIFICATION: + case PGM_DATA: + case PGM_FIXPT_OVERFLOW: + case PGM_FIXPT_DIVIDE: + case PGM_DEC_OVERFLOW: + case PGM_DEC_DIVIDE: + case PGM_HFP_EXP_OVERFLOW: + case PGM_HFP_EXP_UNDERFLOW: + case PGM_HFP_SIGNIFICANCE: + case PGM_HFP_DIVIDE: + case PGM_TRANS_SPEC: + case PGM_SPECIAL_OP: + case PGM_OPERAND: + case PGM_HFP_SQRT: + case PGM_PC_TRANS_SPEC: + case PGM_ALET_SPEC: + case PGM_MONITOR: + /* advance the PSW if our exception is not nullifying */ + env->psw.addr += env->int_pgm_ilen; + break; + } +} + #if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) void s390_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs) @@ -202,38 +238,7 @@ static void do_program_interrupt(CPUS390XState *env) assert(ilen == 2 || ilen == 4 || ilen == 6); - switch (env->int_pgm_code) { - case PGM_PER: - if (env->per_perc_atmid & PER_CODE_EVENT_NULLIFICATION) { - break; - } - /* FALL THROUGH */ - case PGM_OPERATION: - case PGM_PRIVILEGED: - case PGM_EXECUTE: - case PGM_PROTECTION: - case PGM_ADDRESSING: - case PGM_SPECIFICATION: - case PGM_DATA: - case PGM_FIXPT_OVERFLOW: - case PGM_FIXPT_DIVIDE: - case PGM_DEC_OVERFLOW: - case PGM_DEC_DIVIDE: - case PGM_HFP_EXP_OVERFLOW: - case PGM_HFP_EXP_UNDERFLOW: - case PGM_HFP_SIGNIFICANCE: - case PGM_HFP_DIVIDE: - case PGM_TRANS_SPEC: - case PGM_SPECIAL_OP: - case PGM_OPERAND: - case PGM_HFP_SQRT: - case PGM_PC_TRANS_SPEC: - case PGM_ALET_SPEC: - case PGM_MONITOR: - /* advance the PSW if our exception is not nullifying */ - env->psw.addr += ilen; - break; - } + s390_cpu_program_interrupt_advance_psw(env); qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "%s: code=0x%x ilen=%d psw: %" PRIx64 " %" PRIx64 "\n", diff --git a/target/s390x/internal.h b/target/s390x/internal.h index 11515bb617..9f1665ccbf 100644 --- a/target/s390x/internal.h +++ b/target/s390x/internal.h @@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ bool s390_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, int size, void s390x_cpu_do_unaligned_access(CPUState *cs, vaddr addr, MMUAccessType access_type, int mmu_idx, uintptr_t retaddr); +void s390_cpu_program_interrupt_advance_psw(CPUS390XState *cpu); /* fpu_helper.c */ From patchwork Fri May 21 03:01:46 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ilya Leoshkevich X-Patchwork-Id: 12271759 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C79C43461 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E46A61244 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:03:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7E46A61244 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:44740 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljvRf-0006OE-KJ for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:03:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljvQF-0004tP-OU; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:02:01 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:59940 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljvQD-0005Sp-53; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:01:59 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14L2YEBe002137; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:01:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=2+hPymc5IEHsm46D2OWsUqYcFUy3ZRQoir022thuC9k=; b=h9bwtEIqBwHM3tO/90W8Py1AGzBSvpSXtizdqtrabanYAGn+JcQeU2qeam9YcFeIBzn1 gbfOx0+mICIILyivrzT+jgOAvEwtUBmKuWDvlsdO8Ct7kc/Ds7XB5IvKImOk2w4eaUnb FBHzD1hHeFzXSqaI52R+fegJDVzxwzQwEpojVR9gtmARaGPOUxojBB+KwI8xwwn0ALWS 2+dhK+izSXTnOXK7vtkN4fDcIUEijkno+8DdMHOvXt6MaugmKP7Z7J59BupLhul3HnuJ RiYRJYGiDPZuFSgb4UCwivQYIDFMNY66VfPdnCe2dVhQfdcFDrgf2LyDmlWejIv2I8eT 8g== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38p293afe4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 May 2021 23:01:54 -0400 Received: from m0098414.ppops.net (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14L2YrOu006457; Thu, 20 May 2021 23:01:54 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38p293afdj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 May 2021 23:01:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14L2qKWK032589; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:52 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 38j5jh1md6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:52 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 14L31nY133554794 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:49 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA45A4057; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC58A4040; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vm.lan (unknown [9.145.39.144]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 May 2021 03:01:49 +0000 (GMT) From: Ilya Leoshkevich To: Richard Henderson , David Hildenbrand , Laurent Vivier Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tests/tcg/s390x: Test SIGILL handling Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 05:01:46 +0200 Message-Id: <20210521030146.2831663-3-iii@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210521030146.2831663-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210521030146.2831663-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: -JrxCEDf0QvfK60z5Fd990NypDYUj0kO X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: E8vJUXhpV080fuk28tmMAqYoFqKRtfFG X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-20_07:2021-05-20, 2021-05-20 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105210017 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.158.5; envelope-from=iii@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -26 X-Spam_score: -2.7 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Christian Borntraeger , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Ilya Leoshkevich , Andreas Krebbel Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Verify that s390x-specific uc_mcontext.psw.addr is reported correctly. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich --- tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target | 1 + tests/tcg/s390x/sigill.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/tcg/s390x/sigill.c diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target index 241ef28f61..8699d829a5 100644 --- a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ TESTS+=exrl-trtr TESTS+=pack TESTS+=mvo TESTS+=mvc +TESTS+=sigill diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/sigill.c b/tests/tcg/s390x/sigill.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f8021dc6af --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/sigill.c @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +extern char expected_si_addr[]; +extern char expected_psw_addr[]; + +static void handle_signal(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ucontext) +{ + if (sig != SIGILL) { + _exit(1); + } + + if (info->si_addr != expected_si_addr) { + _exit(2); + } + + if (((ucontext_t *)ucontext)->uc_mcontext.psw.addr != + (unsigned long)expected_psw_addr) { + _exit(3); + } +} + +int main(void) +{ + struct sigaction act; + + memset(&act, 0, sizeof(act)); + act.sa_sigaction = handle_signal; + act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO; + + int ret = sigaction(SIGILL, &act, NULL); + assert(ret == 0); + + asm volatile("expected_si_addr:\t.byte\t0x00,0x00\n" + "expected_psw_addr:"); + + return 0; +}