From patchwork Wed Jul 14 01:59:59 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chen Wandun X-Patchwork-Id: 12375525 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6D7C07E95 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 01:51:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A259F60C3F for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 01:51:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A259F60C3F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C16DB6B0088; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:51:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BC6F36B008C; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:51:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A67946B0092; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:51:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0206.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.206]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7816E6B0088 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 21:51:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E132727779 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 01:51:28 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78359516256.04.0A1A8BC Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F027001A08 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 01:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GPgLy72Q6z1CJHc; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:45:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:51:24 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.175.112.125) by dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:51:23 +0800 From: Chen Wandun To: , , , , CC: , , , Hulk Robot Subject: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix wrong behavior in vread Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 09:59:59 +0800 Message-ID: <20210714015959.3204871-1-chenwandun@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.112.125] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 35F027001A08 X-Stat-Signature: sbjqnxgt3iygbfjjooemhcujisguh4o1 Authentication-Results: imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of chenwandun@huawei.com designates 45.249.212.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=chenwandun@huawei.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=huawei.com X-HE-Tag: 1626227488-970416 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: commit f608788cd2d6 ("mm/vmalloc: use rb_tree instead of list for vread() lookups") use rb_tree instread of list to speed up lookup, but function __find_vmap_area is try to find a vmap_area that include target address, if target address is smaller than the leftmost node in vmap_area_root, it will return NULL, then vread will read nothing. This behavior is different from the primitive semantics. The correct way is find the first vmap_are that bigger than target addr, that is what function find_vmap_area_exceed_addr does. Fixes: f608788cd2d6 ("mm/vmalloc: use rb_tree instead of list for vread() lookups") Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun --- mm/vmalloc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index d5cd52805149..47c3a551b6dc 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -787,6 +787,28 @@ unsigned long vmalloc_nr_pages(void) return atomic_long_read(&nr_vmalloc_pages); } +static struct vmap_area *find_vmap_area_exceed_addr(unsigned long addr) +{ + struct vmap_area *va = NULL; + struct rb_node *n = vmap_area_root.rb_node; + + while (n) { + struct vmap_area *tmp; + + tmp = rb_entry(n, struct vmap_area, rb_node); + if (tmp->va_end > addr) { + va = tmp; + if (tmp->va_start <= addr) + break; + + n = n->rb_left; + } else + n = n->rb_right; + } + + return va; +} + static struct vmap_area *__find_vmap_area(unsigned long addr) { struct rb_node *n = vmap_area_root.rb_node; @@ -3267,9 +3289,14 @@ long vread(char *buf, char *addr, unsigned long count) count = -(unsigned long) addr; spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock); - va = __find_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr); + va = find_vmap_area_exceed_addr((unsigned long)addr); if (!va) goto finished; + + /* no intersects with alive vmap_area */ + if ((unsigned long)addr + count <= va->va_start) + goto finished; + list_for_each_entry_from(va, &vmap_area_list, list) { if (!count) break;