From patchwork Mon Nov 22 12:32:53 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wen Gu X-Patchwork-Id: 12631819 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736ECC433EF for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2021 12:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239309AbhKVMgM (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:36:12 -0500 Received: from out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.131]:38818 "EHLO out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239482AbhKVMgL (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 07:36:11 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R141e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01424;MF=guwen@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=9;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0Uxl5nz3_1637584373; Received: from e02h04404.eu6sqa(mailfrom:guwen@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Uxl5nz3_1637584373) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Mon, 22 Nov 2021 20:33:03 +0800 From: Wen Gu To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Subject: [PATCH net] net/smc: Avoid warning of possible recursive locking Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 20:32:53 +0800 Message-Id: <1637584373-49664-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Possible recursive locking is detected by lockdep when SMC falls back to TCP. The corresponding warnings are as follows: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.16.0-rc1+ #18 Tainted: G E -------------------------------------------- wrk/1391 is trying to acquire lock: ffff975246c8e7d8 (&ei->socket.wq.wait){..-.}-{3:3}, at: smc_switch_to_fallback+0x109/0x250 [smc] but task is already holding lock: ffff975246c8f918 (&ei->socket.wq.wait){..-.}-{3:3}, at: smc_switch_to_fallback+0xfe/0x250 [smc] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&ei->socket.wq.wait); lock(&ei->socket.wq.wait); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 2 locks held by wrk/1391: #0: ffff975246040130 (sk_lock-AF_SMC){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: smc_connect+0x43/0x150 [smc] #1: ffff975246c8f918 (&ei->socket.wq.wait){..-.}-{3:3}, at: smc_switch_to_fallback+0xfe/0x250 [smc] stack backtrace: Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x7b __lock_acquire+0x951/0x11f0 lock_acquire+0x27a/0x320 ? smc_switch_to_fallback+0x109/0x250 [smc] ? smc_switch_to_fallback+0xfe/0x250 [smc] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x3b/0x80 ? smc_switch_to_fallback+0x109/0x250 [smc] smc_switch_to_fallback+0x109/0x250 [smc] smc_connect_fallback+0xe/0x30 [smc] __smc_connect+0xcf/0x1090 [smc] ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80 ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x77/0xe0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xbf/0x130 ? smc_connect+0x12a/0x150 [smc] smc_connect+0x12a/0x150 [smc] __sys_connect+0x8a/0xc0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x20/0x70 __x64_sys_connect+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x34/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae The nested locking in smc_switch_to_fallback() is considered to possibly cause a deadlock because smc_wait->lock and clc_wait->lock are the same type of lock. But actually it is safe so far since there is no other place trying to obtain smc_wait->lock when clc_wait->lock is held. So the patch replaces spin_lock() with spin_lock_nested() to avoid false report by lockdep. Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/11/19/962 Fixes: 2153bd1e3d3d ("Transfer remaining wait queue entries during fallback") Reported-by: syzbot+e979d3597f48262cb4ee@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Wen Gu Acked-by: Tony Lu --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index b61c802..2692cba 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static void smc_switch_to_fallback(struct smc_sock *smc, int reason_code) * to clcsocket->wq during the fallback. */ spin_lock_irqsave(&smc_wait->lock, flags); - spin_lock(&clc_wait->lock); + spin_lock_nested(&clc_wait->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); list_splice_init(&smc_wait->head, &clc_wait->head); spin_unlock(&clc_wait->lock); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smc_wait->lock, flags);