From patchwork Thu Dec 8 01:37:24 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yang Jihong X-Patchwork-Id: 13067818 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A91C4708E for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 01:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229544AbiLHBkW (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 20:40:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55742 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229514AbiLHBkV (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 20:40:21 -0500 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF7614AF10; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 17:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from kwepemm600003.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NSGzP3yZWzJqMZ; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:39:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from ubuntu1804.huawei.com (10.67.174.61) by kwepemm600003.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:40:18 +0800 From: Yang Jihong To: , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix comment error in fixup_kfunc_call function Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:37:24 +0800 Message-ID: <20221208013724.257848-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.GIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.61] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To kwepemm600003.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.202) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net insn->imm for kfunc is the relative address of __bpf_call_base, instead of __bpf_base_call, Fix the comment error. Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 264b3dc714cc..ae884a6287c5 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -13889,7 +13889,7 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } /* insn->imm has the btf func_id. Replace it with - * an address (relative to __bpf_base_call). + * an address (relative to __bpf_call_base). */ desc = find_kfunc_desc(env->prog, insn->imm, insn->off); if (!desc) {