From patchwork Fri Apr 21 22:47:42 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: John Harrison X-Patchwork-Id: 13220766 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D8EC77B76 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1889C10EF1E; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73B0E10EF1E; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:47:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1682117267; x=1713653267; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=N5Nz96zPTT4S7mlCkKCfzlD42lLGoMbiPHT6/A6l4MA=; b=VpaCsIrVds41sU9DkTdbWIpTTBZIOC0w/tff1xdsviSgmG5lAGxPUxb7 ZyggYeQSaurs19onEnbcGkJNwb1zp4rbTdkHBlo8iKqjzBfOW1hVtNvAz eQxp/HMgt5nZz/JxTxPpSooT2+l3SwiiTrq7eIvv0eq4GQjMf1oPS0eTT IZFDqKXN+rBNPrVymXDk06QtJIWwru7At9RZpzwopWOZqEqg9qzGaG3il X+8hYsarIh0vD9JCDtNBoYtVUjJvM5JSytc7UYWPw0t2It976k/atC1Q3 jHSfj+R0mJqjY+MIep1bzwQKrDzU9us96d0xg6+8zZCJhqXtprhBhKmhU Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10687"; a="374033672" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,216,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="374033672" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Apr 2023 15:47:46 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10687"; a="642669301" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,216,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="642669301" Received: from relo-linux-5.jf.intel.com ([10.165.21.152]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2023 15:47:46 -0700 From: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com To: Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:47:42 -0700 Message-Id: <20230421224742.2357198-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Actually return an error if GuC version range check fails X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Dan Carpenter , Alan Previn , Jani Nikula , Lucas De Marchi , DRI-Devel@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org, Matthew Auld , Rodrigo Vivi Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" From: John Harrison Dan Carpenter pointed out that 'err' was not being set in the case where the GuC firmware version range check fails. Fix that. Note that while this is bug fix for a previous patch (see Fixes tag below). It is an exceedingly low risk bug. The range check is asserting that the GuC firmware version is within spec. So it should not be possible to ever have a firmware file that fails this check. If larger version numbers are required in the future, that would be a backwards breaking spec change and thus require a major version bump, in which case an old i915 driver would not load that new version anyway. Fixes: 9bbba0667f37 ("drm/i915/guc: Use GuC submission API version number") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: John Harrison Cc: John Harrison Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio Cc: Alan Previn Cc: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Matthew Brost Cc: Andi Shyti Cc: Matthew Auld Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: Lucas De Marchi Cc: Jani Nikula Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c index a82a53dbbc86d..6b71b9febd74c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c @@ -636,9 +636,10 @@ static bool is_ver_8bit(struct intel_uc_fw_ver *ver) return ver->major < 0xFF && ver->minor < 0xFF && ver->patch < 0xFF; } -static bool guc_check_version_range(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw) +static int guc_check_version_range(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw) { struct intel_guc *guc = container_of(uc_fw, struct intel_guc, fw); + struct intel_gt *gt = __uc_fw_to_gt(uc_fw); /* * GuC version number components are defined as being 8-bits. @@ -647,24 +648,24 @@ static bool guc_check_version_range(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw) */ if (!is_ver_8bit(&uc_fw->file_selected.ver)) { - gt_warn(__uc_fw_to_gt(uc_fw), "%s firmware: invalid file version: 0x%02X:%02X:%02X\n", + gt_warn(gt, "%s firmware: invalid file version: 0x%02X:%02X:%02X\n", intel_uc_fw_type_repr(uc_fw->type), uc_fw->file_selected.ver.major, uc_fw->file_selected.ver.minor, uc_fw->file_selected.ver.patch); - return false; + return -EINVAL; } if (!is_ver_8bit(&guc->submission_version)) { - gt_warn(__uc_fw_to_gt(uc_fw), "%s firmware: invalid submit version: 0x%02X:%02X:%02X\n", + gt_warn(gt, "%s firmware: invalid submit version: 0x%02X:%02X:%02X\n", intel_uc_fw_type_repr(uc_fw->type), guc->submission_version.major, guc->submission_version.minor, guc->submission_version.patch); - return false; + return -EINVAL; } - return true; + return i915_inject_probe_error(gt->i915, -EINVAL); } static int check_fw_header(struct intel_gt *gt, @@ -773,8 +774,11 @@ int intel_uc_fw_fetch(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw) if (err) goto fail; - if (uc_fw->type == INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC && !guc_check_version_range(uc_fw)) - goto fail; + if (uc_fw->type == INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC) { + err = guc_check_version_range(uc_fw); + if (err) + goto fail; + } if (uc_fw->file_wanted.ver.major && uc_fw->file_selected.ver.major) { /* Check the file's major version was as it claimed */