From patchwork Fri Sep 22 07:10:17 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13395070 X-Patchwork-Delegate: brendanhiggins@google.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49021E7D0D6 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230386AbjIVHLI (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 03:11:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46288 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230402AbjIVHLH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 03:11:07 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 042AAC2 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RsNc25C0xztSwS; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:06:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:10:58 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] kunit: Fix missed memory release in kunit_free_suite_set() Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:10:17 +0800 Message-ID: <20230922071020.2554677-2-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230922071020.2554677-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20230922071020.2554677-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org modprobe cpumask_kunit and rmmod cpumask_kunit, kmemleak detect a suspected memory leak as below. If kunit_filter_suites() in kunit_module_init() succeeds, the suite_set.start will not be NULL and the kunit_free_suite_set() in kunit_module_exit() should free all the memory which has not been freed. However the test_cases in suites is left out. unreferenced object 0xffff54ac47e83200 (size 512): comm "modprobe", pid 592, jiffies 4294913238 (age 1367.612s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 84 13 1a f0 d3 b6 ff ff 30 68 1a f0 d3 b6 ff ff ........0h...... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000008dec63a2>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368 [<00000000ec280d8e>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290 [<00000000896c7740>] __kmalloc+0x60/0x2c0 [<000000007a50fa06>] kunit_filter_suites+0x254/0x5b8 [<0000000078cc98e2>] kunit_module_notify+0xf4/0x240 [<0000000033cea952>] notifier_call_chain+0x98/0x17c [<00000000973d05cc>] notifier_call_chain_robust+0x4c/0xa4 [<000000005f95895f>] blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x4c/0x74 [<0000000048e36fa7>] load_module+0x1a2c/0x1c40 [<0000000004eb8a91>] init_module_from_file+0x94/0xcc [<0000000037dbba28>] idempotent_init_module+0x184/0x278 [<00000000161b75cb>] __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x68/0xa8 [<000000006dc1669b>] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 [<00000000fa87e304>] el0_svc_common.constprop.1+0x68/0xe0 [<000000009d8ad866>] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [<000000005b83c607>] el0_svc+0x3c/0xc4 Fixes: e5857d396f35 ("kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites") Fixes: b67abaad4d25 ("kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: David Gow --- v2: - Add Reviewed-by. --- lib/kunit/executor.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index a6348489d45f..a037a46fae5e 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -137,8 +137,10 @@ void kunit_free_suite_set(struct kunit_suite_set suite_set) { struct kunit_suite * const *suites; - for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) + for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) { + kfree((*suites)->test_cases); kfree(*suites); + } kfree(suite_set.start); } From patchwork Fri Sep 22 07:10:18 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13395072 X-Patchwork-Delegate: brendanhiggins@google.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B71AE7D0D7 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230419AbjIVHLK (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 03:11:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46274 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230370AbjIVHLJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 03:11:09 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEDB4192 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RsNfX0NnCz15NS3; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:08:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:10:59 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , , Ruan Jinjie Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] kunit: Fix the wrong kfree of copy for kunit_filter_suites() Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:10:18 +0800 Message-ID: <20230922071020.2554677-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230922071020.2554677-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20230922071020.2554677-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not in the first iteration, the copy pointer has been moved. So it should free the original copy's backup copy_start. Fixes: abbf73816b6f ("kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: David Gow --- v2: - Add Reviewed-by. --- lib/kunit/executor.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index a037a46fae5e..9358ed2df839 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, free_copy: if (*err) - kfree(copy); + kfree(copy_start); return filtered; } From patchwork Fri Sep 22 07:10:19 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13395071 X-Patchwork-Delegate: brendanhiggins@google.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEAAE7D0D9 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229623AbjIVHLK (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 03:11:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46298 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230405AbjIVHLJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 03:11:09 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43A53196 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RsNcf15xLzGpq4; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:07:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:11:01 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] kunit: Fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites() Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:10:19 +0800 Message-ID: <20230922071020.2554677-4-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230922071020.2554677-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20230922071020.2554677-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not in the first iteration, the filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases allocated in the last kunit_filter_attr_tests() in last inner for loop is leaked. So add a new free_filtered_suite err label and free the filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases so far. And change kmalloc_array of copy to kcalloc to Clear the copy to make the kfree safe. Fixes: 5d31f71efcb6 ("kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites") Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: David Gow --- v2: - Add Reviewed-by. --- lib/kunit/executor.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 9358ed2df839..1236b3cd2fbb 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -157,10 +157,11 @@ kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, struct kunit_suite_set filtered = {NULL, NULL}; struct kunit_glob_filter parsed_glob; struct kunit_attr_filter *parsed_filters = NULL; + struct kunit_suite * const *suites; const size_t max = suite_set->end - suite_set->start; - copy = kmalloc_array(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL); + copy = kcalloc(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL); if (!copy) { /* won't be able to run anything, return an empty set */ return filtered; } @@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, parsed_glob.test_glob); if (IS_ERR(filtered_suite)) { *err = PTR_ERR(filtered_suite); - goto free_parsed_filters; + goto free_filtered_suite; } } if (filter_count > 0 && parsed_filters != NULL) { @@ -212,11 +213,11 @@ kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, filtered_suite = new_filtered_suite; if (*err) - goto free_parsed_filters; + goto free_filtered_suite; if (IS_ERR(filtered_suite)) { *err = PTR_ERR(filtered_suite); - goto free_parsed_filters; + goto free_filtered_suite; } if (!filtered_suite) break; @@ -231,6 +232,14 @@ kunit_filter_suites(const struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, filtered.start = copy_start; filtered.end = copy; +free_filtered_suite: + if (*err) { + for (suites = copy_start; suites < copy; suites++) { + kfree((*suites)->test_cases); + kfree(*suites); + } + } + free_parsed_filters: if (filter_count) kfree(parsed_filters); From patchwork Fri Sep 22 07:10:20 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13395073 X-Patchwork-Delegate: brendanhiggins@google.com Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D718BE7D0D2 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230370AbjIVHLL (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 03:11:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46288 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230253AbjIVHLL (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 03:11:11 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C15CEC2 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4RsNdZ0NckzVl9P; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:08:02 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:11:02 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] kunit: test: Fix the possible memory leak in executor_test Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 15:10:20 +0800 Message-ID: <20230922071020.2554677-5-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20230922071020.2554677-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20230922071020.2554677-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.73] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org When CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y, making CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_AUTO_SCAN=y, the below memory leak is detected. If kunit_filter_suites() succeeds, not only copy but also filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases should be freed. So as Rae suggested, to avoid the suite set never be freed when KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ() fails and exits after kunit_filter_suites() succeeds, update kfree_at_end() func to free_suite_set_at_end() to use kunit_free_suite_set() to free them as kunit_module_exit() and kunit_run_all_tests() do it. As the second arg got of free_suite_set_at_end() is a local variable, copy it for free to avoid wild-memory-access. After applying this patch, the following memory leak is never detected. unreferenced object 0xffff8881001de400 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1396, jiffies 4294720452 (age 932.801s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x44d/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test+0x12f/0x360 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cd388 (size 192): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1396, jiffies 4294720452 (age 932.801s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff 80 cd 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x481/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test+0x12f/0x360 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888100da8400 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1398, jiffies 4294720454 (age 781.945s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x44d/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x12f/0x560 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888105117878 (size 96): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1398, jiffies 4294720454 (age 781.945s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff a0 ac 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x481/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x12f/0x560 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888102c31c00 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1404, jiffies 4294720460 (age 781.948s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 6e 6f 72 6d 61 6c 5f 73 75 69 74 65 00 00 00 00 normal_suite.... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0xf7/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_test+0x195/0x5f0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cd250 (size 192): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1404, jiffies 4294720460 (age 781.948s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff 00 a9 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0x1a1/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_test+0x195/0x5f0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888104f4e400 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1408, jiffies 4294720464 (age 781.944s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite........... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0xf7/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_skip_test+0x133/0x6e0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cc620 (size 192): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1408, jiffies 4294720464 (age 781.944s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff c0 a8 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0x1a1/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_skip_test+0x133/0x6e0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Fixes: e5857d396f35 ("kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Suggested-by: Rae Moar Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309142251.uJ8saAZv-lkp@intel.com/ Reviewed-by: David Gow --- v3: - Update the kfree_at_end() to use kunit_free_suite_set() instead calling it directly. - Update the commit message. - Add Suggested-by. v2: - Add the memory leak backtrace. - Remove the unused func kfree_at_end() kernel test robot noticed. - Update the commit message. --- lib/kunit/executor_test.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c index b4f6f96b2844..6b68959def9d 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ #include #include -static void kfree_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free); +static void free_suite_set_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free); static struct kunit_suite *alloc_fake_suite(struct kunit *test, const char *suite_name, struct kunit_case *test_cases); @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void filter_suites_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2", NULL, NULL, &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* Validate we just have suite2 */ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static void filter_suites_test_glob_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2.test2", NULL, NULL, &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* Validate we just have suite2 */ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static void filter_suites_to_empty_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "not_found", NULL, NULL, &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); /* just in case */ + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* just in case */ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, got.start, got.end, "should be empty to indicate no match"); @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static void filter_attr_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, NULL, filter, NULL, &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* Validate we just have normal_suite */ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void filter_attr_empty_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, NULL, filter, NULL, &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); /* just in case */ + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* just in case */ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, got.start, got.end, "should be empty to indicate no match"); @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static void filter_attr_skip_test(struct kunit *test) got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, NULL, filter, "skip", &err); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); - kfree_at_end(test, got.start); + free_suite_set_at_end(test, &got); /* Validate we have both the slow and normal test */ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]->test_cases); @@ -256,18 +256,27 @@ kunit_test_suites(&executor_test_suite); /* Test helpers */ -/* Use the resource API to register a call to kfree(to_free). +static void free_suite_set(struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set) +{ + kunit_free_suite_set(*suite_set); + kfree(suite_set); +} + +/* Use the resource API to register a call to free_suite_set. * Since we never actually use the resource, it's safe to use on const data. */ -static void kfree_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free) +static void free_suite_set_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free) { - /* kfree() handles NULL already, but avoid allocating a no-op cleanup. */ - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(to_free)) + if (!((struct kunit_suite_set *)to_free)->start) return; + struct kunit_suite_set *free = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kunit_suite_set), + GFP_KERNEL); + *free = *(struct kunit_suite_set *)to_free; + kunit_add_action(test, - (kunit_action_t *)kfree, - (void *)to_free); + (kunit_action_t *)free_suite_set, + (void *)free); } static struct kunit_suite *alloc_fake_suite(struct kunit *test,