From patchwork Mon Jan 15 14:26:07 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matti Vaittinen X-Patchwork-Id: 13519704 Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com [209.85.167.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF3DD17591; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="VZ4n28vL" Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50ea8fbf261so10226770e87.2; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:26:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705328773; x=1705933573; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cIOsRYDHDhxxVXfuG9oGMdNEUD+sQmayiF+K0XyJDPk=; b=VZ4n28vLO5OFzGtcKI3PAI59mM8nStv0ttJhL/sgc/LyjUFT0mDM6ygGsN1E+zy5g1 z9EEd2sIs+BXrVGuuCCI64xCidLDPlj8ar5zsHFPVhlAbFoIXKIBAa4Gndf5GDLlHhk5 FiSfZ+1BVewVA8O600T5nmHhfLkhW2sGqcAfcHpyabq/8zLvVqrYU871an7HJnuP1ZQp K2xi+Ucf9CApzVEI63PB4oJWShjkjlDL2lNpxbwOp4yoRyaJR83Evh1QqT9lHDFPXG4d dwyzFtFvjXJuv52tlrB0iIqDtRwoD5QlWEuZiiEdB8PblPImt/ZwH6DJwY2TpkbRKlXy PAyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705328773; x=1705933573; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cIOsRYDHDhxxVXfuG9oGMdNEUD+sQmayiF+K0XyJDPk=; b=Rpddy/AZG/yDSv7dJTAx9PNS0gyJDQKjjN7Hiv//DQfLEAWfH+EdV6WifJDTXGZ95A VGRwNoPtZXEygKL9jWXV95V2RsVpiIelAMDmv8dQOqD3tEkFsMgafz+L5PCQMP3XXwD8 7VMoqlsc5feBBFlV0sRitMTFpPzcOj5F8QPeQCSee0/oqP4O6xMYJAf5Nv+ZwbgA6Dew 6sQwwMKQiBQVVeoQ9vy74Tk8/hQgj6S1oVe9Q8lk9Zqsr2dI6fB8MI2Q2GYBeQufB6lC rtE3/4JjeUBdgrIFXsOpc3pAP0ctTPDRYNsej7nsp3tcrccOq/6+pletoZkR/MCSt9jj 6CBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzPf6VZheqEW0eLfoZZEbKQAh8weKcuHrixr3c6bm/qETo7efO9 hKEZsiG4QUaQqY/mJdSTXUnVeMFENpZScQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGLIe3PgaFFaD1kOijhimlYGaW7QnokEh4BeuGuNCPfBaG+icZ9EAcOBiq5ppy5ebJSFuHh/g== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5f6a:0:b0:50e:c483:9e2d with SMTP id c10-20020ac25f6a000000b0050ec4839e2dmr2248146lfc.40.1705328772424; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:26:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedora (mobile-access-567347-211.dhcp.inet.fi. [86.115.71.211]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 15-20020ac2484f000000b0050e7964e2b7sm1475778lfy.290.2024.01.15.06.26.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:26:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:26:07 +0200 From: Matti Vaittinen To: Matti Vaittinen , Matti Vaittinen Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Matti Vaittinen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: test: test gain-time-scale helpers Message-ID: <0f7505b43f91394dc3bb636369489c897b7e01a7.1705328293.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Some light sensors can adjust both the HW-gain and integration time. There are cases where adjusting the integration time has similar impact to the scale of the reported values as gain setting has. IIO users do typically expect to handle scale by a single writable 'scale' entry. Driver should then adjust the gain/time accordingly. It however is difficult for a driver to know whether it should change gain or integration time to meet the requested scale. Usually it is preferred to have longer integration time which usually improves accuracy, but there may be use-cases where long measurement times can be an issue. Thus it can be preferable to allow also changing the integration time - but mitigate the scale impact by also changing the gain underneath. Eg, if integration time change doubles the measured values, the driver can reduce the HW-gain to half. The theory of the computations of gain-time-scale is simple. However, some people (undersigned) got that implemented wrong for more than once. Hence some gain-time-scale helpers were introduced. Add some simple tests to verify the most hairy functions. Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen --- This patch depends on the KUnit managed device APIs which seem to get merged to v6.8-rc1. Changes: v1 => v2: (As per the review by Jonathan) - remove extra whitespaces Below history uses numbering from the series which added the GTS helpers to the IIO - tree. The numbering was restarted as the GTS helpers series was applied while this patch was dropped as kunit_device support was not yet there. v6 => v7: - Fix available integration times to be expressed in seconds v5 => v6: - Use kunit root-device registration wrapper v4 => v5: - remove empty lines from Kconfig - adapt to drop of the non devm iio_init - test also init with couple of invalid tables v3 => v4: - use dummy device to test devm interfaces - adapt to the new header location - drop tests for dropped interfaces v2 => v3: - Use namespace for iio-gts-helpers RFCv1 => v2: - add tests for available scales/times helpers - adapt to renamed iio-gts-helpers.h header --- drivers/iio/test/Kconfig | 14 + drivers/iio/test/Makefile | 1 + drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gts.c | 513 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 528 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gts.c diff --git a/drivers/iio/test/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/test/Kconfig index 0b6e4e278a2f..33cca49c8058 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/test/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/iio/test/Kconfig @@ -4,6 +4,20 @@ # # Keep in alphabetical order +config IIO_GTS_KUNIT_TEST + tristate "Test IIO formatting functions" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on KUNIT + select IIO_GTS_HELPER + select TEST_KUNIT_DEVICE_HELPERS + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + build unit tests for the IIO light sensor gain-time-scale helpers. + + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general, please refer + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + + If unsure, say N. Keep in alphabetical order + config IIO_RESCALE_KUNIT_TEST tristate "Test IIO rescale conversion functions" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS depends on KUNIT && IIO_RESCALE diff --git a/drivers/iio/test/Makefile b/drivers/iio/test/Makefile index d76eaf36da82..e9a4cf1ff57f 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/test/Makefile +++ b/drivers/iio/test/Makefile @@ -6,4 +6,5 @@ # Keep in alphabetical order obj-$(CONFIG_IIO_RESCALE_KUNIT_TEST) += iio-test-rescale.o obj-$(CONFIG_IIO_FORMAT_KUNIT_TEST) += iio-test-format.o +obj-$(CONFIG_IIO_GTS_KUNIT_TEST) += iio-test-gts.o CFLAGS_iio-test-format.o += $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN) diff --git a/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gts.c b/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gts.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..cf7ab773ea0b --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gts.c @@ -0,0 +1,513 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* Unit tests for IIO light sensor gain-time-scale helpers + * + * Copyright (c) 2023 Matti Vaittinen + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +/* + * Please, read the "rant" from the top of the lib/test_linear_ranges.c if + * you see a line of helper code which is not being tested. + * + * Then, please look at the line which is not being tested. Is this line + * somehow unusually complex? If answer is "no", then chances are that the + * "development inertia" caused by adding a test exceeds the benefits. + * + * If yes, then adding a test is probably a good idea but please stop for a + * moment and consider the effort of changing all the tests when code gets + * refactored. Eventually it neeeds to be. + */ + +#define TEST_TSEL_50 1 +#define TEST_TSEL_X_MIN TEST_TSEL_50 +#define TEST_TSEL_100 0 +#define TEST_TSEL_200 2 +#define TEST_TSEL_400 4 +#define TEST_TSEL_X_MAX TEST_TSEL_400 + +#define TEST_GSEL_1 0x00 +#define TEST_GSEL_X_MIN TEST_GSEL_1 +#define TEST_GSEL_4 0x08 +#define TEST_GSEL_16 0x0a +#define TEST_GSEL_32 0x0b +#define TEST_GSEL_64 0x0c +#define TEST_GSEL_256 0x18 +#define TEST_GSEL_512 0x19 +#define TEST_GSEL_1024 0x1a +#define TEST_GSEL_2048 0x1b +#define TEST_GSEL_4096 0x1c +#define TEST_GSEL_X_MAX TEST_GSEL_4096 + +#define TEST_SCALE_1X 64 +#define TEST_SCALE_MIN_X TEST_SCALE_1X +#define TEST_SCALE_2X 32 +#define TEST_SCALE_4X 16 +#define TEST_SCALE_8X 8 +#define TEST_SCALE_16X 4 +#define TEST_SCALE_32X 2 +#define TEST_SCALE_64X 1 + +#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_128X 500000000 +#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_256X 250000000 +#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_512X 125000000 +#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_1024X 62500000 +#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_2048X 31250000 +#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X 15625000 +#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X2 7812500 +#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X4 3906250 +#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X8 1953125 + +#define TEST_SCALE_NANO_MAX_X TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X8 + +/* + * Can't have this allocated from stack because the kunit clean-up will + * happen only after the test function has already gone + */ +static struct iio_gts gts; + +static const struct iio_gain_sel_pair gts_test_gains[] = { + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(1, TEST_GSEL_1), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(4, TEST_GSEL_4), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(16, TEST_GSEL_16), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(32, TEST_GSEL_32), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(64, TEST_GSEL_64), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(256, TEST_GSEL_256), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(512, TEST_GSEL_512), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(1024, TEST_GSEL_1024), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(2048, TEST_GSEL_2048), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(4096, TEST_GSEL_4096), +#define HWGAIN_MAX 4096 +}; + +static const struct iio_itime_sel_mul gts_test_itimes[] = { + GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(400 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_400, 8), + GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(200 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_200, 4), + GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(100 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_100, 2), + GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(50 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_50, 1), +#define TIMEGAIN_MAX 8 +}; +#define TOTAL_GAIN_MAX (HWGAIN_MAX * TIMEGAIN_MAX) +#define IIO_GTS_TEST_DEV "iio-gts-test-dev" + +static struct device *__test_init_iio_gain_scale(struct kunit *test, + struct iio_gts *gts, const struct iio_gain_sel_pair *g_table, + int num_g, const struct iio_itime_sel_mul *i_table, int num_i) +{ + struct device *dev; + int ret; + + dev = kunit_device_register(test, IIO_GTS_TEST_DEV); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)) + return NULL; + + ret = devm_iio_init_iio_gts(dev, TEST_SCALE_1X, 0, g_table, num_g, + i_table, num_i, gts); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + if (ret) + return NULL; + + return dev; +} + +#define test_init_iio_gain_scale(test, gts) \ + __test_init_iio_gain_scale(test, gts, gts_test_gains, \ + ARRAY_SIZE(gts_test_gains), gts_test_itimes, \ + ARRAY_SIZE(gts_test_itimes)) + +static void test_init_iio_gts_invalid(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device *dev; + int ret; + const struct iio_itime_sel_mul itimes_neg[] = { + GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(-10, TEST_TSEL_400, 8), + GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(200 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_200, 4), + }; + const struct iio_gain_sel_pair gains_neg[] = { + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(1, TEST_GSEL_1), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(2, TEST_GSEL_4), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(-2, TEST_GSEL_16), + }; + /* 55555 * 38656 = 2147534080 => overflows 32bit int */ + const struct iio_itime_sel_mul itimes_overflow[] = { + GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(400 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_400, 55555), + GAIN_SCALE_ITIME_US(200 * 1000, TEST_TSEL_200, 4), + }; + const struct iio_gain_sel_pair gains_overflow[] = { + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(1, TEST_GSEL_1), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(2, TEST_GSEL_4), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(38656, TEST_GSEL_16), + }; + + dev = kunit_device_register(test, IIO_GTS_TEST_DEV); + KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev); + if (!dev) + return; + + /* Ok gains, negative time */ + ret = devm_iio_init_iio_gts(dev, TEST_SCALE_1X, 0, gts_test_gains, + ARRAY_SIZE(gts_test_gains), itimes_neg, + ARRAY_SIZE(itimes_neg), >s); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EINVAL, ret); + + /* Ok times, negative gain */ + ret = devm_iio_init_iio_gts(dev, TEST_SCALE_1X, 0, gains_neg, + ARRAY_SIZE(gains_neg), gts_test_itimes, + ARRAY_SIZE(gts_test_itimes), >s); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EINVAL, ret); + + /* gain * time overflow int */ + ret = devm_iio_init_iio_gts(dev, TEST_SCALE_1X, 0, gains_overflow, + ARRAY_SIZE(gains_overflow), itimes_overflow, + ARRAY_SIZE(itimes_overflow), >s); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EOVERFLOW, ret); +} + +static void test_iio_gts_find_gain_for_scale_using_time(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device *dev; + int ret, gain_sel; + + dev = test_init_iio_gain_scale(test, >s); + if (!dev) + return; + + ret = iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(>s, TEST_TSEL_100, + TEST_SCALE_8X, 0, &gain_sel); + /* + * Meas time 100 => gain by time 2x + * TEST_SCALE_8X matches total gain 8x + * => required HWGAIN 4x + */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_GSEL_4, gain_sel); + + ret = iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(>s, TEST_TSEL_200, 0, + TEST_SCALE_NANO_256X, &gain_sel); + /* + * Meas time 200 => gain by time 4x + * TEST_SCALE_256X matches total gain 256x + * => required HWGAIN 256/4 => 64x + */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_GSEL_64, gain_sel); + + /* Min time, Min gain */ + ret = iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(>s, TEST_TSEL_X_MIN, + TEST_SCALE_MIN_X, 0, &gain_sel); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_GSEL_1, gain_sel); + + /* Max time, Max gain */ + ret = iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(>s, TEST_TSEL_X_MAX, + 0, TEST_SCALE_NANO_MAX_X, &gain_sel); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_GSEL_4096, gain_sel); + + ret = iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(>s, TEST_TSEL_100, 0, + TEST_SCALE_NANO_256X, &gain_sel); + /* + * Meas time 100 => gain by time 2x + * TEST_SCALE_256X matches total gain 256x + * => required HWGAIN 256/2 => 128x (not in gain-table - unsupported) + */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret); + + ret = iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(>s, TEST_TSEL_200, 0, + TEST_SCALE_NANO_MAX_X, &gain_sel); + /* We can't reach the max gain with integration time smaller than MAX */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret); + + ret = iio_gts_find_gain_sel_for_scale_using_time(>s, TEST_TSEL_50, 0, + TEST_SCALE_NANO_MAX_X, &gain_sel); + /* We can't reach the max gain with integration time smaller than MAX */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret); +} + +static void test_iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device *dev; + int ret, old_gain, new_gain, old_time_sel, new_time_sel; + + dev = test_init_iio_gain_scale(test, >s); + if (!dev) + return; + + old_gain = 32; + old_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_200; + new_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_400; + + ret = iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(>s, old_gain, + old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + /* + * Doubling the integration time doubles the total gain - so old + * (hw)gain must be divided by two to compensate. => 32 / 2 => 16 + */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 16, new_gain); + + old_gain = 4; + old_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_50; + new_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_200; + ret = iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(>s, old_gain, + old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + /* + * gain by time 1x => 4x - (hw)gain 4x => 1x + */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, new_gain); + + old_gain = 512; + old_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_400; + new_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_50; + ret = iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(>s, old_gain, + old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + /* + * gain by time 8x => 1x - (hw)gain 512x => 4096x) + */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 4096, new_gain); + + /* Unsupported gain 2x */ + old_gain = 4; + old_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_200; + new_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_400; + ret = iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(>s, old_gain, + old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain); + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret); + + /* Too small gain */ + old_gain = 4; + old_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_50; + new_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_400; + ret = iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(>s, old_gain, + old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain); + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret); + + /* Too big gain */ + old_gain = 1024; + old_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_400; + new_time_sel = TEST_TSEL_50; + ret = iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time(>s, old_gain, + old_time_sel, new_time_sel, &new_gain); + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, 0, ret); + +} + +static void test_iio_find_closest_gain_low(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device *dev; + bool in_range; + int ret; + + const struct iio_gain_sel_pair gts_test_gains_gain_low[] = { + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(4, TEST_GSEL_4), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(16, TEST_GSEL_16), + GAIN_SCALE_GAIN(32, TEST_GSEL_32), + }; + + dev = test_init_iio_gain_scale(test, >s); + if (!dev) + return; + + ret = iio_find_closest_gain_low(>s, 2, &in_range); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, in_range); + + ret = iio_find_closest_gain_low(>s, 1, &in_range); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, in_range); + + ret = iio_find_closest_gain_low(>s, 4095, &in_range); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2048, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, true, in_range); + + ret = iio_find_closest_gain_low(>s, 4097, &in_range); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 4096, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, in_range); + + kunit_device_unregister(test, dev); + + dev = __test_init_iio_gain_scale(test, >s, gts_test_gains_gain_low, + ARRAY_SIZE(gts_test_gains_gain_low), + gts_test_itimes, ARRAY_SIZE(gts_test_itimes)); + if (!dev) + return; + + ret = iio_find_closest_gain_low(>s, 3, &in_range); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EINVAL, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, false, in_range); +} + +static void test_iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device *dev; + int ret, scale_int, scale_nano; + + dev = test_init_iio_gain_scale(test, >s); + if (!dev) + return; + + ret = iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(>s, 1, &scale_int, &scale_nano); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_SCALE_1X, scale_int); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, scale_nano); + + ret = iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(>s, 1, &scale_int, &scale_nano); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_SCALE_1X, scale_int); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, scale_nano); + + ret = iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(>s, 4096 * 8, &scale_int, + &scale_nano); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, scale_int); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, TEST_SCALE_NANO_4096X8, scale_nano); +} + +static void test_iio_gts_chk_times(struct kunit *test, const int *vals) +{ + static const int expected[] = {0, 50000, 0, 100000, 0, 200000, 0, 400000}; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(expected); i++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], vals[i]); +} + +static void test_iio_gts_chk_scales_all(struct kunit *test, struct iio_gts *gts, + const int *vals, int len) +{ + static const int gains[] = {1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, + 1024, 2048, 4096, 4096 * 2, 4096 * 4, + 4096 * 8}; + int expected[ARRAY_SIZE(gains) * 2]; + int i, ret; + int exp_len = ARRAY_SIZE(gains) * 2; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, exp_len, len); + if (len != exp_len) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gains); i++) { + ret = iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(gts, gains[i], + &expected[2 * i], + &expected[2 * i + 1]); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + if (ret) + return; + } + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(expected); i++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], vals[i]); +} + +static void test_iio_gts_chk_scales_t200(struct kunit *test, struct iio_gts *gts, + const int *vals, int len) +{ + /* The gain caused by time 200 is 4x */ + static const int gains[] = { + 1 * 4, + 4 * 4, + 16 * 4, + 32 * 4, + 64 * 4, + 256 * 4, + 512 * 4, + 1024 * 4, + 2048 * 4, + 4096 * 4 + }; + int expected[ARRAY_SIZE(gains) * 2]; + int i, ret; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2 * ARRAY_SIZE(gains), len); + if (len < 2 * ARRAY_SIZE(gains)) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gains); i++) { + ret = iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale(gts, gains[i], + &expected[2 * i], + &expected[2 * i + 1]); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret); + if (ret) + return; + } + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(expected); i++) + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, expected[i], vals[i]); +} + +static void test_iio_gts_avail_test(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct device *dev; + int ret; + int type, len; + const int *vals; + + dev = test_init_iio_gain_scale(test, >s); + if (!dev) + return; + + /* test table building for times and iio_gts_avail_times() */ + ret = iio_gts_avail_times(>s, &vals, &type, &len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_AVAIL_LIST, ret); + if (ret) + return; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, type); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 8, len); + if (len < 8) + return; + + test_iio_gts_chk_times(test, vals); + + /* Test table building for all scales and iio_gts_all_avail_scales() */ + ret = iio_gts_all_avail_scales(>s, &vals, &type, &len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_AVAIL_LIST, ret); + if (ret) + return; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, type); + + test_iio_gts_chk_scales_all(test, >s, vals, len); + + /* + * Test table building for scales/time and + * iio_gts_avail_scales_for_time() + */ + ret = iio_gts_avail_scales_for_time(>s, 200000, &vals, &type, &len); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_AVAIL_LIST, ret); + if (ret) + return; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO, type); + test_iio_gts_chk_scales_t200(test, >s, vals, len); +} + +static struct kunit_case iio_gts_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(test_init_iio_gts_invalid), + KUNIT_CASE(test_iio_gts_find_gain_for_scale_using_time), + KUNIT_CASE(test_iio_gts_find_new_gain_sel_by_old_gain_time), + KUNIT_CASE(test_iio_find_closest_gain_low), + KUNIT_CASE(test_iio_gts_total_gain_to_scale), + KUNIT_CASE(test_iio_gts_avail_test), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite iio_gts_test_suite = { + .name = "iio-gain-time-scale", + .test_cases = iio_gts_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suite(iio_gts_test_suite); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Matti Vaittinen "); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test IIO light sensor gain-time-scale helpers"); +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(IIO_GTS_HELPER); From patchwork Mon Jan 15 14:26:33 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matti Vaittinen X-Patchwork-Id: 13519705 Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com (mail-lj1-f170.google.com [209.85.208.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06AE4175AC; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="UMFj96r2" Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2cceb5f0918so91975511fa.2; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:26:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705328798; x=1705933598; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5/Zs+aBmtESFoeZ7SNF5LX5i1bmnX6SQxNhbicALPwo=; b=UMFj96r2+oAnNbPqZF83zDwMuFLI0AzsKItQ6ZTaE2ytJZAWnY2uBKIJD7DlB30RFK 7/tP0hPVE9kVK0SfKbfsziE7UKjr8aSFCZbXssbU03abx3k4Im/T+VH+MWVSvTj7YU7+ 7QiVmGfV9LBjYTHtwCjLYcQ6tfp7KYLiyaMLxzglWfRH5C46Na/ACluURnRsY6zPG9+N GU5+RfFKuEIY2a0p2F0OLvGlT4VyZKjEpJ1nLgnkW/o32YnShRJTgJ58kZGvucnQK2al 9hQK4Id7mJ+X/GNQlVVa5aZ/x4TpL0EVxAErlWf/ErdUj2SrgE9OllSkDZqrEX3c2bhx qO5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705328798; x=1705933598; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5/Zs+aBmtESFoeZ7SNF5LX5i1bmnX6SQxNhbicALPwo=; b=NFcl9ID/rbgIQGG44Ql91UXXYj/jo1Gx++0x4cu/6j0FNNG18PC33uXNyDdIP7+x7C 4zlWQ/6yrNVvKEL0mCX7pLESJyTj7RKJE/EALDrvMe9939f4lCTBp4gyxBs79UenwYqk USpM6p8nbQhLeOFuHLHPwC46bqqRPfMFz1YVUZjUlWBWKMdP2f/zg5Yex2kw72/DYbGe j5JQ0KIwIr3Q0wda84Xy99aA4kXHOY2mOd3dZVIVsXbPU4N5ZJfSCZkov36ORIadZ2ep /KoCLuL2xG4yVBfkHicIvA/pPSGBPkJAGReUX2Bxo4mbV/QTlglWaGcD7DyzUS+0hS+T waHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzEbo4Dd8bbXHIb/7+9x77QuUqEb5CeRp0yqqAFhqVOpwOq7Sld o8Bn7yPz5gPu4k4w37dMrxU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEJwfh6lTX3JivmH+xIsnM5lMBSMyfQsWPJdNLtbYZpk9TagfGzkfw7AchuaFuvTqlKYKBYnw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b050:0:b0:2cd:70e9:3327 with SMTP id d16-20020a2eb050000000b002cd70e93327mr1559461ljl.76.1705328797684; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:26:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedora (mobile-access-567347-211.dhcp.inet.fi. [86.115.71.211]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c3-20020a2ea1c3000000b002ccdb771df0sm1344398ljm.108.2024.01.15.06.26.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:26:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:26:33 +0200 From: Matti Vaittinen To: Matti Vaittinen , Matti Vaittinen Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Matti Vaittinen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add IIO GTS tests Message-ID: <52c66fe2798192529738ac2ab98a27230a6ad8cd.1705328293.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Add undersigned as a maintainer for IIO GTS helper's KUnit tests. Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen --- This may or may not conflict with the filename fix here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAO=gReFVhp7QK_XZRBO5vbv6fmFb4BdsZeQPSzWvuiz9UeQekA@mail.gmail.com/ Conflict should be very trivial so I didn't wait for the above fix to get in IIO tree. I can rebase and resend if this appears to be a problem though. --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 40c754b4c39c..05c13e0f8c4d 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -10310,6 +10310,7 @@ L: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: drivers/iio/light/gain-time-scale-helper.c F: drivers/iio/light/gain-time-scale-helper.h +F: drivers/iio/test/iio-test-gts.c IIO MULTIPLEXER M: Peter Rosin