From patchwork Mon Jan 22 10:20:01 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: shaozhengchao X-Patchwork-Id: 13525099 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F403A1A4 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.190 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705918224; cv=none; b=Js7v+t7yKUyY1pcxCx1aq/s5cmTtuk6P3ACHqMx7/k/VDomHG93rxsoOXk0xSCfM/y+i7RHUnlw1C5DYUKv/IYal44jeLTnt79XFts8S2aJU+g2fUXeBn34ElxHPTuY8V2cOt2nbbubi3cteRlP1AnyMg4Jg1JfpE0G45Y7ao1g= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705918224; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Xs02bXOHEtBherwX1MdNe+78dbMb/VhrNGWB5lDYz0U=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Dg/Dm4H6ZH99zxFj6rI2QnjLpT9rfS4Tiwb5XPW1BK1/iiGjmfdPNXXwTM27lssDxAp9l8KXI83BCwoGVSXpYEbmXxrnnE1LkjRCRhaakXCDluP/Y5PcIN3be2CUYIxbJp3L4s2NV76hwSCAFh7/Q8GEfMckjtoObUVdQP/jUWY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.190 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.44]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TJQtd1gRJz1xmZr; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:09:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500026.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.106]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D0241402CB; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:10:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.101.6) by dggpeml500026.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:10:18 +0800 From: Zhengchao Shao To: , , , , , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH net] ipv6: init the accept_queue's spinlocks in inet6_create Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:20:01 +0800 Message-ID: <20240122102001.2851701-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpeml500026.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.106) X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org In commit 198bc90e0e73("tcp: make sure init the accept_queue's spinlocks once"), the spinlocks of accept_queue are initialized only when socket is created in the inet4 scenario. The locks are not initialized when socket is created in the inet6 scenario. The kernel reports the following error: INFO: trying to register non-static key. The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe you didn't initialize this object before use? turning off the locking correctness validator. Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:107) register_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1289) __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015) lock_acquire.part.0 (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5756) _raw_spin_lock_bh (kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178) inet_csk_listen_stop (net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:1386) tcp_disconnect (net/ipv4/tcp.c:2981) inet_shutdown (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:935) __sys_shutdown (./include/linux/file.h:32 net/socket.c:2438) __x64_sys_shutdown (net/socket.c:2445) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:129) RIP: 0033:0x7f52ecd05a3d Code: 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d ab a3 0e 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f52ecf5dde8 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000030 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f52ecf5e640 RCX: 00007f52ecd05a3d RDX: 00007f52ecc8b188 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007f52ecf5de20 R08: 00007ffdae45c69f R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 00007f52ecf5e640 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f52ecc8b060 R15: 00007ffdae45c6e0 Fixes: 198bc90e0e73 ("tcp: make sure init the accept_queue's spinlocks once") Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet --- net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c index 13a1833a4df5..959bfd9f6344 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c @@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ static int inet6_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol, if (INET_PROTOSW_REUSE & answer_flags) sk->sk_reuse = SK_CAN_REUSE; + if (INET_PROTOSW_ICSK & answer_flags) + inet_init_csk_locks(sk); + inet = inet_sk(sk); inet_assign_bit(IS_ICSK, sk, INET_PROTOSW_ICSK & answer_flags);