From patchwork Thu Oct 10 03:58:11 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "D. Wythe" X-Patchwork-Id: 13829449 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Received: from out30-99.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-99.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E5F0558B7; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 03:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.99 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728532702; cv=none; b=T6WAVCSsDCErf3k1PlNmPQaqz5Mgivtw95PwwpeWybPGvq1HdSO4Gboce+BB2P2sQNjEnyvnreCfFzn9VWxV2QkwV+THTbim237rT8tEuGdwNIvfyO9BjCui+Qca9KkX5zF0Pij5+eWq34dRpMqfNE6sU1EaHmuP5wFGnveulos= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728532702; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FPqeY0G22nBxa9qVXWs1m5Mm6fT3IOVgxr8CX4tynmE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id; b=PF6WbzUkDHfpgaOVANYMYpXpwsaCnOqdRHtRSAG6S1c5F/AVcSlei67nLx4LLQk2deERoURcNJ5i9GXp3mq8UkCjYITi9oUyo0HvEq5naoPZciO27SpSdYsh6Uz5uMuvZ8udVhKzmKSVVDJvZDC2ci46H5vf/kLLJRvHXPS6Als= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=xGfegS1+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.99 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="xGfegS1+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1728532696; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id; bh=7kYNcKRHlS5yYQwqfh0s4ZfdVhzFEa9OJov7XbY1SeA=; b=xGfegS1+K58pccqmYhiqTSKdjsd3M+3v0audUtnuTN3QI5N5Ij3TJv1oiEZMTh3czht6w5IeLumPa40fxr8U0ULEgtB3texyWeCo0Su8YSP90lbfzLDRg7tHmfGfti+ZGqYs4vYkKgPJNcON/ptT2HtdJp+HGwrY9byrsKboJl8= Received: from j66a10360.sqa.eu95.tbsite.net(mailfrom:alibuda@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WGksTns_1728532691) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:58:16 +0800 From: "D. Wythe" To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com, wintera@linux.ibm.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com, ast@kernel.org Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH net-next] net/smc: Introduce a hook to modify syn_smc at runtime Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:58:11 +0800 Message-Id: <1728532691-20044-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org From: "D. Wythe" The introduction of IPPROTO_SMC enables eBPF programs to determine whether to use SMC based on the context of socket creation, such as network namespaces, PID and comm name, etc. As a subsequent enhancement, this patch introduces a new hook for eBPF programs that allows decisions on whether to use SMC or not at runtime, including but not limited to local/remote IP address or ports. In simpler words, this feature allows modifications to syn_smc through eBPF programs before the TCP three-way handshake got established. Thanks to kfunc for making it easier for us to implement this feature in SMC. Signed-off-by: D. Wythe --- include/linux/tcp.h | 4 ++- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 4 +-- net/smc/af_smc.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h index 6a5e08b..d028d76 100644 --- a/include/linux/tcp.h +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h @@ -478,7 +478,9 @@ struct tcp_sock { #endif #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC) bool syn_smc; /* SYN includes SMC */ - bool (*smc_hs_congested)(const struct sock *sk); + void (*smc_openreq_init)(struct request_sock *req, + const struct tcp_options_received *rx_opt, + struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sock *sk); #endif #if defined(CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG) || defined(CONFIG_TCP_AO) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index cc05ec1..15fe8b9 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -7036,8 +7036,8 @@ static void tcp_openreq_init(struct request_sock *req, ireq->ir_num = ntohs(tcp_hdr(skb)->dest); ireq->ir_mark = inet_request_mark(sk, skb); #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC) - ireq->smc_ok = rx_opt->smc_ok && !(tcp_sk(sk)->smc_hs_congested && - tcp_sk(sk)->smc_hs_congested(sk)); + if (rx_opt->smc_ok && tcp_sk(sk)->smc_openreq_init) + tcp_sk(sk)->smc_openreq_init(req, rx_opt, skb, sk); #endif } diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index 0316217..550799c 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -70,6 +70,15 @@ static void smc_tcp_listen_work(struct work_struct *); static void smc_connect_work(struct work_struct *); +__bpf_hook_start(); + +__weak noinline int select_syn_smc(const struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *peer) +{ + return 1; +} + +__bpf_hook_end(); + int smc_nl_dump_hs_limitation(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb) { struct smc_nl_dmp_ctx *cb_ctx = smc_nl_dmp_ctx(cb); @@ -156,19 +165,43 @@ static struct sock *smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk, return NULL; } -static bool smc_hs_congested(const struct sock *sk) +static void smc_openreq_init(struct request_sock *req, + const struct tcp_options_received *rx_opt, + struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sock *sk) { + struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req); + struct sockaddr_storage rmt_sockaddr = {}; const struct smc_sock *smc; smc = smc_clcsock_user_data(sk); if (!smc) - return true; + return; - if (workqueue_congested(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, smc_hs_wq)) - return true; + if (smc->limit_smc_hs && workqueue_congested(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, smc_hs_wq)) + goto out_no_smc; - return false; + rmt_sockaddr.ss_family = sk->sk_family; + + if (rmt_sockaddr.ss_family == AF_INET) { + struct sockaddr_in *rmt4_sockaddr = (struct sockaddr_in *)&rmt_sockaddr; + + rmt4_sockaddr->sin_addr.s_addr = ireq->ir_rmt_addr; + rmt4_sockaddr->sin_port = ireq->ir_rmt_port; +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) + } else { + struct sockaddr_in6 *rmt6_sockaddr = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&rmt_sockaddr; + + rmt6_sockaddr->sin6_addr = ireq->ir_v6_rmt_addr; + rmt6_sockaddr->sin6_port = ireq->ir_rmt_port; +#endif /* CONFIG_IPV6 */ + } + + ireq->smc_ok = select_syn_smc(sk, (struct sockaddr *)&rmt_sockaddr); + return; +out_no_smc: + ireq->smc_ok = 0; + return; } struct smc_hashinfo smc_v4_hashinfo = { @@ -1671,7 +1704,7 @@ int smc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, } smc_copy_sock_settings_to_clc(smc); - tcp_sk(smc->clcsock->sk)->syn_smc = 1; + tcp_sk(smc->clcsock->sk)->syn_smc = select_syn_smc(sk, addr); if (smc->connect_nonblock) { rc = -EALREADY; goto out; @@ -2650,8 +2683,7 @@ int smc_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog) inet_csk(smc->clcsock->sk)->icsk_af_ops = &smc->af_ops; - if (smc->limit_smc_hs) - tcp_sk(smc->clcsock->sk)->smc_hs_congested = smc_hs_congested; + tcp_sk(smc->clcsock->sk)->smc_openreq_init = smc_openreq_init; rc = kernel_listen(smc->clcsock, backlog); if (rc) { @@ -3475,6 +3507,24 @@ static void __net_exit smc_net_stat_exit(struct net *net) .exit = smc_net_stat_exit, }; +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL) +BTF_SET8_START(bpf_smc_fmodret_ids) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, select_syn_smc) +BTF_SET8_END(bpf_smc_fmodret_ids) + +static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_smc_fmodret_set = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .set = &bpf_smc_fmodret_ids, +}; + +static int bpf_smc_kfunc_init(void) +{ + return register_btf_fmodret_id_set(&bpf_smc_fmodret_set); +} +#else +static inline int bpf_smc_kfunc_init(void) { return 0; } +#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */ + static int __init smc_init(void) { int rc; @@ -3574,8 +3624,17 @@ static int __init smc_init(void) pr_err("%s: smc_inet_init fails with %d\n", __func__, rc); goto out_ulp; } + + rc = bpf_smc_kfunc_init(); + if (rc) { + pr_err("%s: bpf_smc_kfunc_init fails with %d\n", __func__, rc); + goto out_inet; + } + static_branch_enable(&tcp_have_smc); return 0; +out_inet: + smc_inet_exit(); out_ulp: tcp_unregister_ulp(&smc_ulp_ops); out_lo: