From patchwork Mon Oct 14 18:22:27 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Joanne Koong X-Patchwork-Id: 13835385 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9609BD1813A for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0E42F6B008C; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:23:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 094866B0092; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:23:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E9E0F6B0093; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:23:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA496B008C for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:23:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01191611D6 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:23:43 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82673031336.12.7D0EEE9 Received: from mail-yb1-f179.google.com (mail-yb1-f179.google.com [209.85.219.179]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADD980006 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=l7l4HG+v; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of joannelkoong@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=joannelkoong@gmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1728930183; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ldg5VAEGcU/bJxMpj3zYFQlZtLZ6ZDdVHhg/uYLUnku+IRxbsFN5COF9NBqFQgH7ovDEWR K9vvGPd74zMFfSmAXLOw2RCqHeu4koHR8Hr5gnlhBdSIXiI6IqwtYh96IIftlOf1SjyOWa M3kZLQYKMDZtcf9M1BJ2eSkaQPp72NQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=l7l4HG+v; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of joannelkoong@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=joannelkoong@gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1728930183; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=fdBz15jaWsg8cxk/btL9PXuORpPlgL7NIU4wQ/z1ydQ=; b=lhSELI6xuagMYmtiij8ULb9Yh1fDTcNFmn/0o6kJq4yJiaMnNOJ4CTxoTBlDc1Y+EFp5ng JT0wbTANEWx0tZmtl0EDCOYMdWLQjc9wobrceFoQnNu3G4NUBC76qG7r9JgGwqAIO7zDYS AvRXpQptRf5zCbu6C6nMfmSnqRo+HR8= Received: by mail-yb1-f179.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e290222fdd0so3871693276.2 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:23:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1728930228; x=1729535028; darn=kvack.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=fdBz15jaWsg8cxk/btL9PXuORpPlgL7NIU4wQ/z1ydQ=; b=l7l4HG+v4iAR11Cbw+I7GReuAN6pIDL/d+IrJ+Uw97ZKe2hnelOG7+5P6b30AVRW6n 73LYnl3xSpBiaUbpLvzv74PF6GPWvg5u2xUxz8HJLUVlDS3cA7PllbAkBuNd0BMJEOwV WA1H7sgDbq9rBrxO8V2INffOyzl5gc84HumQxdEvStMEKGVnOqxMPXZAH27QKe4awM2d VHE0ep/ky/TEqq7/HX8/unyGSb3JpZl+XV05D/7yON1E7tIPlUwuKL4nqcY+7auJRTgw stCsy1JLSo8uvfVsYDfNir8rYSby77JPpwFy9wCAcfQajSf58HMeDs3ZgLzrJSUkvFhj r+2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728930228; x=1729535028; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fdBz15jaWsg8cxk/btL9PXuORpPlgL7NIU4wQ/z1ydQ=; b=JcBQQQ3AGGSYZTvw2fmANo8MvqEkDZ2evHJ873bo1i2A9P2MaOT2EsE+KLj8GOfIij BW8OuRtQIH3WX5qa4VEwmvSDG9b6gpHQgfHdJ99zPiu5BIkRPqSXA+mneHM47NpMRuW7 G17Do0jTYDFUL1cASubbGoi/TpFqEmtPnP1Bycrt32hYllLHAOyAnrBEDkIVY4IpE0ds 29UbNagIBgT4dofUc2sHiJQFvC/d96IDaHKE0m0M9CpoA90j/Gk/LoYBoL4+0gdJiOZ9 0SeWY4WaadgZI6SSgRDc3WCpJZmOoDXGfHCj/OLNdLBHCHP/IoZQjnffQt5B/dnE3YcE ZlUw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXk1eL4lP3awsae7qltttZn2v1OyHL4j9n3sK1gVCsk4HXrbMQD6BbotlKpunKGZRS/VrqURgsa3w==@kvack.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxz2jjn0CwJw5rPUORto4DMfDoE9i03PI7w9pXF4XrpECbn4GWN jBIyl1puCvH00gfNuikA2cfcKpXBkqhaM2xazefgAm8qv75pELwc X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH0HBiv9xojtsirLqVwsKrhBEcPpvem9jXWisw4CBG6ZuEb3+X3anL3lNcMpVwQK3GNkEA0FQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:660a:b0:6e3:430c:b120 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6e3477bad81mr88698067b3.5.1728930228550; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fwdproxy-nha-114.fbsv.net. [2a03:2880:25ff:72::face:b00c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 00721157ae682-6e332cac1c6sm16249157b3.132.2024.10.14.11.23.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:23:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Joanne Koong To: miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: josef@toxicpanda.com, bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm, jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: skip reclaiming folios in writeback contexts that may trigger deadlock Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:22:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20241014182228.1941246-2-joannelkoong@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.5 In-Reply-To: <20241014182228.1941246-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> References: <20241014182228.1941246-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5ADD980006 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Stat-Signature: g9tppbjrs9w1n4yb5dnqoybgq67c9ytc X-HE-Tag: 1728930217-557929 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX19p/2xaSXHNityMwNl1zwI+mmYfu0ipkS6SZk0CfOjef+YSyXfYODZ2fFvVq5/beugTVwwZQbI2oVrzRrImowQUP7njTASR+ekbyujvWfAuwpFMdHMIrCiSSt3osq5bv4WarxlnJpiiGIVp4ZtnNvso2LFlD3awiNLigpOQqoKKA/4x0sFW64zfP2DslMslOrbjwcPTfgRyqFvzmQwQIDCXhULryH1LemzteHMSSFQjiAobtSqYMeVlXu+0JHt9sVl/0kyVV4ExzecohT/AJ5MMaa1ap+/8Gq/mNEugga30bICtZvX3F02wqYHUGoTTYSZLlW10kC2dgpSRivODmgMkVMaopMLkaMR92TxpR80eRtT18Sv+mKTW2bosRxVICH8dTRfMdxoGdeuWigibjKaw2z999p3BHAXtATq2j1C3YHKImf0WOnl5WB8jEz0sdwm0psax8aowSpo36fUS+P03ugzIemctsL72HIqKH06huReO3Iu66OwE9qZrIFXkIp41sziPErtpxQ9N4nqAGeR0/L+EVO+ZpjkLZG/ktEloSRBC/PxRb78esanKEplLh/+iwHiz9qkFIxC4aX2arJAhNd3fMA1PFl/sR+OA4CgWU18sEcYYl3unQsKJsET7PB4VwTRyZgJtQrKOtQ7Y+hVTeMM6LdCC2tKsURM3p8ausqJ2720g+pfrA9ZWCOzhZAO1j9dQwQGYy+Xmgnbj4DSbUxBdJyo7tlWD8eTg2d0R3hOF5R/uDHYuHPhx3fJbJ8W4FN+S25YoRz/92bJPEokA5dJVXMZ/8iIntq6YAO0OJeqHmS7BPX0oYbmE6SqTMbNXRCOe960Y54brZOu4tXnAaP0QIIRh2KAtzMOFk91C2v4eINpZ0Jkjf3RTcA5TiI0P6LxBOotdLfN32ZgBFcL5YkcrSeWwxEnHBrGzSqPnXE0bxvCBRkFb1GLTz/BYDhjwr2CosZN H5BIvCx4 hWXuO2e7wobQ5zAq5YMAXvFxsfW66AfK4bUumgDpbEUqoUHqNz/2HXbTtlB4YMvPoeDAxd5aLoUrR8VWIoVYApt44SseCumrjPVsqva+8cBcjoUVxP34awl07Z7LVD/KLfh+moyA2IOBLGv0u8mk6T4x6x2aafL6y5YUmlRD7hKqPEMZKT061qLok+KHjjua5Kz69mzqoXCTDpq4P6a91Rz+OjU+dWkHu5sn1dun7V19bxIJFQh2c+gQEOLXT4+cruKXIucOkLTfb8pgt0woMjXelsNq+Jm8DctSleqEycPPhRy6k0qyePKwLJRsRLjCN/oKQ5h1zshQnOoe2RqROAPqDGY6gd5EK8jUshyI2C4WgQ1I= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Currently in shrink_folio_list(), reclaim for folios under writeback falls into 3 different cases: 1) Reclaim is encountering an excessive number of folios under writeback and this folio has both the writeback and reclaim flags set 2) Dirty throttling is enabled (this happens if reclaim through cgroup is not enabled, if reclaim through cgroupv2 memcg is enabled, or if reclaim is on the root cgroup), or if the folio is not marked for immediate reclaim, or if the caller does not have __GFP_FS (or __GFP_IO if it's going to swap) set 3) Legacy cgroupv1 encounters a folio that already has the reclaim flag set and the caller did not have __GFP_FS (or __GFP_IO if swap) set In cases 1) and 2), we activate the folio and skip reclaiming it while in case 3), we wait for writeback to finish on the folio and then try to reclaim the folio again. In case 3, we wait on writeback because cgroupv1 does not have dirty folio throttling, as such this is a mitigation against the case where there are too many folios in writeback with nothing else to reclaim. The issue is that for filesystems where writeback may block, sub-optimal workarounds need to be put in place to avoid potential deadlocks that may arise from the case where reclaim waits on writeback. (Even though case 3 above is rare given that legacy cgroupv1 is on its way to being deprecated, this case still needs to be accounted for) For example, for FUSE filesystems, when a writeback is triggered on a folio, a temporary folio is allocated and the pages are copied over to this temporary folio so that writeback can be immediately cleared on the original folio. This additionally requires an internal rb tree to keep track of writeback state on the temporary folios. Benchmarks show roughly a ~20% decrease in throughput from the overhead incurred with 4k block size writes. The temporary folio is needed here in order to avoid the following deadlock if reclaim waits on writeback: * single-threaded FUSE server is in the middle of handling a request that needs a memory allocation * memory allocation triggers direct reclaim * direct reclaim waits on a folio under writeback (eg falls into case 3 above) that needs to be written back to the fuse server * the FUSE server can't write back the folio since it's stuck in direct reclaim This commit adds a new flag, AS_NO_WRITEBACK_RECLAIM, to "enum mapping_flags" which filesystems can set to signify that reclaim should not happen when the folio is already in writeback. This only has effects on the case where cgroupv1 memcg encounters a folio under writeback that already has the reclaim flag set (eg case 3 above), and allows for the suboptimal workarounds added to address the "reclaim wait on writeback" deadlock scenario to be removed. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong --- include/linux/pagemap.h | 11 +++++++++++ mm/vmscan.c | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h index 68a5f1ff3301..513a72b8451b 100644 --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ enum mapping_flags { AS_STABLE_WRITES = 7, /* must wait for writeback before modifying folio contents */ AS_INACCESSIBLE = 8, /* Do not attempt direct R/W access to the mapping */ + AS_NO_WRITEBACK_RECLAIM = 9, /* Do not reclaim folios under writeback */ /* Bits 16-25 are used for FOLIO_ORDER */ AS_FOLIO_ORDER_BITS = 5, AS_FOLIO_ORDER_MIN = 16, @@ -335,6 +336,16 @@ static inline bool mapping_inaccessible(struct address_space *mapping) return test_bit(AS_INACCESSIBLE, &mapping->flags); } +static inline void mapping_set_no_writeback_reclaim(struct address_space *mapping) +{ + set_bit(AS_NO_WRITEBACK_RECLAIM, &mapping->flags); +} + +static inline int mapping_no_writeback_reclaim(struct address_space *mapping) +{ + return test_bit(AS_NO_WRITEBACK_RECLAIM, &mapping->flags); +} + static inline gfp_t mapping_gfp_mask(struct address_space * mapping) { return mapping->gfp_mask; diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 749cdc110c74..885d496ae652 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1110,6 +1110,8 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, if (writeback && folio_test_reclaim(folio)) stat->nr_congested += nr_pages; + mapping = folio_mapping(folio); + /* * If a folio at the tail of the LRU is under writeback, there * are three cases to consider. @@ -1165,7 +1167,8 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, /* Case 2 above */ } else if (writeback_throttling_sane(sc) || !folio_test_reclaim(folio) || - !may_enter_fs(folio, sc->gfp_mask)) { + !may_enter_fs(folio, sc->gfp_mask) || + (mapping && mapping_no_writeback_reclaim(mapping))) { /* * This is slightly racy - * folio_end_writeback() might have @@ -1320,7 +1323,6 @@ static unsigned int shrink_folio_list(struct list_head *folio_list, if (folio_maybe_dma_pinned(folio)) goto activate_locked; - mapping = folio_mapping(folio); if (folio_test_dirty(folio)) { /* * Only kswapd can writeback filesystem folios From patchwork Mon Oct 14 18:22:28 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Joanne Koong X-Patchwork-Id: 13835386 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DE8D1813C for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7EA2E6B0092; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:23:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 799716B0093; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:23:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 639DE6B0095; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:23:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4168C6B0092 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:23:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65DF81252 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:23:45 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82673031378.04.3B772AE Received: from mail-yw1-f179.google.com (mail-yw1-f179.google.com [209.85.128.179]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0309CC000A for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=lMuyA0kl; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of joannelkoong@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=joannelkoong@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1728930088; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=vn2Zqr2YW/8xEyZKSmPvgOx+ZITTlLNenE0JaPqR3LM=; b=TyotylPIHwRmb/Jy9M9MHJPwEMHEO+Hb6RKLOUZq6U3i1uPH+orqcdb6WEPXr8u0KQUFGP 4KOKAmUdoXuVXdSwPje7GQ18h3GK12f4QSHt+oZypaJaFqGqn1/tforHE0Z0++cH1ALZ5N X3W9BIWq2e8aq+yuGDFRUhq2o9y4oD4= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1728930088; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=q2qfn2kPItDLEo13AfCRe6TOArAhO2681cEe0/ARfojVsuHu0/uQOBZgw86S9T0P/vaXWX NmMrtcKzemUJyB97BqAJ+tSAMSVnNe/A/TtdDvODtO3wQnOOeRXiUdHNYl9EMyT98SrPtI A8Zwc7g7g4XeCx3x//fwBChZn2SsEcQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=lMuyA0kl; spf=pass (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of joannelkoong@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=joannelkoong@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-yw1-f179.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6e35fb3792eso24793287b3.3 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:23:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1728930230; x=1729535030; darn=kvack.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=vn2Zqr2YW/8xEyZKSmPvgOx+ZITTlLNenE0JaPqR3LM=; b=lMuyA0klX/j7DIgS5bdUuqzz5bJTD+TWmIBxIaLbYRaJd9I0cOAf5qFmH+nZfzqzJ/ 08uLrUXpf5xw5+biqPsiUOkzglNio9vCrRDFfulNEmjJrz4F+a5THUvQ+oc09gHRv53b w9uoRcPO8g/i6sB4jQgKBmSqv48qQ/RP+Evrg7DJIC+9epoYJy20j454q5/sCMPuwmN8 ocutm6o2VUOGOwUBwJkbVzLHVQYhw+BOKng8UI0kUVls7qxQx3C9Nj3rn6vibaWvnCzn KzQHUmWRHBUbMmpCDsr8mCPUrc/2RQ4YoProEQJPpqltRzDg/tbOnm5U63Valwfcozl4 sngw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1728930230; x=1729535030; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vn2Zqr2YW/8xEyZKSmPvgOx+ZITTlLNenE0JaPqR3LM=; b=QXEpzkEsY4p0r3sqlREQ7xzPh4yfu7sb99ghCaeZwLbW6BZQ2cg/UujsReCRlzxUSN YpDHQz5kA2qAFNMabjjlHY+r/H8/eA/zE5XlvfuWuv3p3tY+pBuBabJ8vw4E/oHkbZ5N +R5BFMklvlWVNwxIJNJZhRUV06Sxs6yqghc2Oi/m+UQR3qGGwYPhckabLByn/6wIicyg +gxj6tB8X/Tlez+AmfGKHmwfD61IxaIa4k0IMzULqVAwmnSD89cgioumQhjqOdhhNdYR mSFJJMyhiEByjMyEz92wbu90bJ4b7VfVzNQrOIXBvVcyS8vmqOvvLWm0pfqB4ffzrtzN f7CQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXlEKfR44s6D5DbrsaF05YQq4AopkJJZeUefP//jFApxCI9bUxu6oGR3f8zSE9H2V9WJWr1RHYSWw==@kvack.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwpoYPVXHOQG7ZF5YLgIBCY2BSyvT3iZ87hlLPl68LmxiVYro3e pO5oobZY+xKVVdoF8rAqKhkUhTcv9p9FvG9pvGmALKKShX0qixcI X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHFRmZYYby2DlSxkDObccc1uchQMMWeE/n2GxfnUfA7rusW9c8UvUC+Y6h6h0m5sOmxI/7x9A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:660a:b0:6db:de99:28ae with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6e3479b64e9mr83469227b3.17.1728930229875; Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fwdproxy-nha-116.fbsv.net. [2a03:2880:25ff:74::face:b00c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 00721157ae682-6e332b8aa7fsm16239347b3.53.2024.10.14.11.23.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:23:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Joanne Koong To: miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: josef@toxicpanda.com, bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm, jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] fuse: remove tmp folio for writebacks and internal rb tree Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:22:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20241014182228.1941246-3-joannelkoong@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.5 In-Reply-To: <20241014182228.1941246-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> References: <20241014182228.1941246-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Stat-Signature: 4b4wbi14f1k6d8q6j99raut88gjpupts X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0309CC000A X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-HE-Tag: 1728930227-869945 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1+JpK3iqiE8Zst/5FuRQCtVAVEeK/CTKSgdGPQbNCZOUuomo3f5XKXJnIV80facEF2Zf9Kh73B+fRmNhmaKaT/Pyafru81iqP/O/9kaNZorXqlnJYvNFdo4M891N8HGS+14IlibmJknlhNoProweOn+slFysJ3RxlOPHEpvpQeBcNDsHNblGs3unwqODW8FWtgmLpfTQ9UXvrZQRdA4/x1tapDm8Ti0cPKj+1Bd56LlH4bj0qfTbYtFRU2oYQVTIM0ygZJoN/eFNS2U+Z3dF66sIy6cngW4lXWm6k/jdJRTqzD/5Hx8S6vKYkl60hlUkxdgyt4r0vFQH5m2WCwmEUj0ZZb7ABJwCSeSzXHL3zzn/3XMdA5Z3GAURj/Jwr2JjBwaNiDG2hGnwELpQjLeT5XjkRimcdKP2LYvJEvNt2Nq9D0FS7n8jSva0VUJWvxnLyrwyJuwk0SsXFF+0FB2BjqZQi98+VfI0NgEZFjlvn3ItekBrWvpUn5HDOz7LOG/w9DLBx+2r9pk1P6kKjbZ+pnRU62d3qLCt1eO4aVsNKmtdlohvZ1dxC1jWpBihlDHLNnwMLtJ0tRi5+YANQemOjUs83lZpxqLUY8Pfe7q2NFJ/lRMDqdikfrmO/B2AU2qdi8Y/4/Iw7J5VwF36t2oz8+j2xGwcpX7OnnMoLgjs1M2FBLkwMaKUCbCGhASCFM411KyX2eT4RGsnbjt+zLjTYUGysnlpBAg4AftyVG0V/EMBH4GQNXj6AOS/68uWNoVUF3znIboleEZKTP9mls9e8IDoL+za9shqm6Fp/dpm4t3nNhdufgaQSzcK1h5REMvFyLyQYL/GSQb/h/iWEsNFTAnTNnZjJ09V5f8Rqynig+NEEA+ne4Xe9qkK3VwsvLb56nUaDB+9EMWcGCrreLl17BtHwpBO9qN5FfrfVfGsBHW0X1V1gvUax2pmnAbfpKNZWujTu5Lroc Si3xdewm VPDQsEJ4vNgb5jzUGCV07Vzpy82kKMpteOjlstKR+Mf1/b/Tfort1Y8AlNsi6fDq8qAC2HlhqdT2UFm9Buy1D+artoGP1EPyDTHmwYJ3KDuZCo3qadYUAR3hdRtOn/HLqDXoqPv6bg94eNDNccwYmW8VeVTaNj0uJpDLJdIgR/5jy8TooKjIEwU9fWfUEotPp/DfNi4MeRmTTACud2MkMCzUOJsa/k1o0r2ceMozn+I6KyHNVnY7iG+rki04gA7qCzMswYOW2u8+UYOwadksIB6rV+DeiIOd3IqJfVUBISKK5SbqqLGxRQJyU14xIiwis1hAR+xABTnsTAxC9pOGd+kvgJX3Pt0cleHrGzDSaDdaks3A= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Currently, we allocate and copy data to a temporary folio when handling writeback in order to mitigate the following deadlock scenario that may arise if reclaim waits on writeback to complete: * single-threaded FUSE server is in the middle of handling a request that needs a memory allocation * memory allocation triggers direct reclaim * direct reclaim waits on a folio under writeback * the FUSE server can't write back the folio since it's stuck in direct reclaim To work around this, we allocate a temporary folio and copy over the original folio to the temporary folio so that writeback can be immediately cleared on the original folio. This additionally requires us to maintain an internal rb tree to keep track of writeback state on the temporary folios. This change sets AS_NO_WRITEBACK_RECLAIM on the inode mapping so that FUSE folios are not reclaimed and waited on while in writeback, and removes the temporary folio + extra copying and the internal rb tree. fio benchmarks -- (using averages observed from 10 runs, throwing away outliers) Setup: sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=30G tmpfs ~/tmp_mount ./libfuse/build/example/passthrough_ll -o writeback -o max_threads=4 -o source=~/tmp_mount ~/fuse_mount fio --name=writeback --ioengine=sync --rw=write --bs={1k,4k,1M} --size=2G --numjobs=2 --ramp_time=30 --group_reporting=1 --directory=/root/fuse_mount bs = 1k 4k 1M Before 351 MiB/s 1818 MiB/s 1851 MiB/s After 341 MiB/s 2246 MiB/s 2685 MiB/s % diff -3% 23% 45% Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong --- fs/fuse/file.c | 322 +++++-------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 294 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c index 4304e44f32e6..c3c5ddb4f66b 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/file.c +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c @@ -415,74 +415,11 @@ u64 fuse_lock_owner_id(struct fuse_conn *fc, fl_owner_t id) struct fuse_writepage_args { struct fuse_io_args ia; - struct rb_node writepages_entry; struct list_head queue_entry; - struct fuse_writepage_args *next; struct inode *inode; struct fuse_sync_bucket *bucket; }; -static struct fuse_writepage_args *fuse_find_writeback(struct fuse_inode *fi, - pgoff_t idx_from, pgoff_t idx_to) -{ - struct rb_node *n; - - n = fi->writepages.rb_node; - - while (n) { - struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa; - pgoff_t curr_index; - - wpa = rb_entry(n, struct fuse_writepage_args, writepages_entry); - WARN_ON(get_fuse_inode(wpa->inode) != fi); - curr_index = wpa->ia.write.in.offset >> PAGE_SHIFT; - if (idx_from >= curr_index + wpa->ia.ap.num_pages) - n = n->rb_right; - else if (idx_to < curr_index) - n = n->rb_left; - else - return wpa; - } - return NULL; -} - -/* - * Check if any page in a range is under writeback - */ -static bool fuse_range_is_writeback(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t idx_from, - pgoff_t idx_to) -{ - struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode); - bool found; - - if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&fi->writepages)) - return false; - - spin_lock(&fi->lock); - found = fuse_find_writeback(fi, idx_from, idx_to); - spin_unlock(&fi->lock); - - return found; -} - -static inline bool fuse_page_is_writeback(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index) -{ - return fuse_range_is_writeback(inode, index, index); -} - -/* - * Wait for page writeback to be completed. - * - * Since fuse doesn't rely on the VM writeback tracking, this has to - * use some other means. - */ -static void fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index) -{ - struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode); - - wait_event(fi->page_waitq, !fuse_page_is_writeback(inode, index)); -} - /* * Wait for all pending writepages on the inode to finish. * @@ -876,7 +813,7 @@ static int fuse_do_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page) * page-cache page, so make sure we read a properly synced * page. */ - fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, page->index); + folio_wait_writeback(page_folio(page)); attr_ver = fuse_get_attr_version(fm->fc); @@ -1024,8 +961,7 @@ static void fuse_readahead(struct readahead_control *rac) ap = &ia->ap; nr_pages = __readahead_batch(rac, ap->pages, nr_pages); for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) { - fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, - readahead_index(rac) + i); + folio_wait_writeback(page_folio(ap->pages[i])); ap->descs[i].length = PAGE_SIZE; } ap->num_pages = nr_pages; @@ -1147,7 +1083,7 @@ static ssize_t fuse_send_write_pages(struct fuse_io_args *ia, int err; for (i = 0; i < ap->num_pages; i++) - fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, ap->pages[i]->index); + folio_wait_writeback(page_folio(ap->pages[i])); fuse_write_args_fill(ia, ff, pos, count); ia->write.in.flags = fuse_write_flags(iocb); @@ -1583,7 +1519,7 @@ ssize_t fuse_direct_io(struct fuse_io_priv *io, struct iov_iter *iter, return res; } } - if (!cuse && fuse_range_is_writeback(inode, idx_from, idx_to)) { + if (!cuse && filemap_range_has_writeback(mapping, pos, (pos + count - 1))) { if (!write) inode_lock(inode); fuse_sync_writes(inode); @@ -1780,13 +1716,17 @@ static ssize_t fuse_splice_write(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, struct file *out, static void fuse_writepage_free(struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa) { struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &wpa->ia.ap; + struct folio *folio; int i; if (wpa->bucket) fuse_sync_bucket_dec(wpa->bucket); - for (i = 0; i < ap->num_pages; i++) - __free_page(ap->pages[i]); + for (i = 0; i < ap->num_pages; i++) { + folio = page_folio(ap->pages[i]); + folio_end_writeback(folio); + folio_put(folio); + } fuse_file_put(wpa->ia.ff, false); @@ -1799,7 +1739,7 @@ static void fuse_writepage_finish_stat(struct inode *inode, struct page *page) struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode); dec_wb_stat(&bdi->wb, WB_WRITEBACK); - dec_node_page_state(page, NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP); + dec_node_page_state(page, NR_WRITEBACK); wb_writeout_inc(&bdi->wb); } @@ -1822,7 +1762,6 @@ static void fuse_send_writepage(struct fuse_mount *fm, __releases(fi->lock) __acquires(fi->lock) { - struct fuse_writepage_args *aux, *next; struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(wpa->inode); struct fuse_write_in *inarg = &wpa->ia.write.in; struct fuse_args *args = &wpa->ia.ap.args; @@ -1858,18 +1797,8 @@ __acquires(fi->lock) out_free: fi->writectr--; - rb_erase(&wpa->writepages_entry, &fi->writepages); fuse_writepage_finish(wpa); spin_unlock(&fi->lock); - - /* After rb_erase() aux request list is private */ - for (aux = wpa->next; aux; aux = next) { - next = aux->next; - aux->next = NULL; - fuse_writepage_finish_stat(aux->inode, aux->ia.ap.pages[0]); - fuse_writepage_free(aux); - } - fuse_writepage_free(wpa); spin_lock(&fi->lock); } @@ -1897,43 +1826,6 @@ __acquires(fi->lock) } } -static struct fuse_writepage_args *fuse_insert_writeback(struct rb_root *root, - struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa) -{ - pgoff_t idx_from = wpa->ia.write.in.offset >> PAGE_SHIFT; - pgoff_t idx_to = idx_from + wpa->ia.ap.num_pages - 1; - struct rb_node **p = &root->rb_node; - struct rb_node *parent = NULL; - - WARN_ON(!wpa->ia.ap.num_pages); - while (*p) { - struct fuse_writepage_args *curr; - pgoff_t curr_index; - - parent = *p; - curr = rb_entry(parent, struct fuse_writepage_args, - writepages_entry); - WARN_ON(curr->inode != wpa->inode); - curr_index = curr->ia.write.in.offset >> PAGE_SHIFT; - - if (idx_from >= curr_index + curr->ia.ap.num_pages) - p = &(*p)->rb_right; - else if (idx_to < curr_index) - p = &(*p)->rb_left; - else - return curr; - } - - rb_link_node(&wpa->writepages_entry, parent, p); - rb_insert_color(&wpa->writepages_entry, root); - return NULL; -} - -static void tree_insert(struct rb_root *root, struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa) -{ - WARN_ON(fuse_insert_writeback(root, wpa)); -} - static void fuse_writepage_end(struct fuse_mount *fm, struct fuse_args *args, int error) { @@ -1953,41 +1845,6 @@ static void fuse_writepage_end(struct fuse_mount *fm, struct fuse_args *args, if (!fc->writeback_cache) fuse_invalidate_attr_mask(inode, FUSE_STATX_MODIFY); spin_lock(&fi->lock); - rb_erase(&wpa->writepages_entry, &fi->writepages); - while (wpa->next) { - struct fuse_mount *fm = get_fuse_mount(inode); - struct fuse_write_in *inarg = &wpa->ia.write.in; - struct fuse_writepage_args *next = wpa->next; - - wpa->next = next->next; - next->next = NULL; - tree_insert(&fi->writepages, next); - - /* - * Skip fuse_flush_writepages() to make it easy to crop requests - * based on primary request size. - * - * 1st case (trivial): there are no concurrent activities using - * fuse_set/release_nowrite. Then we're on safe side because - * fuse_flush_writepages() would call fuse_send_writepage() - * anyway. - * - * 2nd case: someone called fuse_set_nowrite and it is waiting - * now for completion of all in-flight requests. This happens - * rarely and no more than once per page, so this should be - * okay. - * - * 3rd case: someone (e.g. fuse_do_setattr()) is in the middle - * of fuse_set_nowrite..fuse_release_nowrite section. The fact - * that fuse_set_nowrite returned implies that all in-flight - * requests were completed along with all of their secondary - * requests. Further primary requests are blocked by negative - * writectr. Hence there cannot be any in-flight requests and - * no invocations of fuse_writepage_end() while we're in - * fuse_set_nowrite..fuse_release_nowrite section. - */ - fuse_send_writepage(fm, next, inarg->offset + inarg->size); - } fi->writectr--; fuse_writepage_finish(wpa); spin_unlock(&fi->lock); @@ -2074,19 +1931,18 @@ static void fuse_writepage_add_to_bucket(struct fuse_conn *fc, } static void fuse_writepage_args_page_fill(struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa, struct folio *folio, - struct folio *tmp_folio, uint32_t page_index) + uint32_t page_index) { struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host; struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &wpa->ia.ap; - folio_copy(tmp_folio, folio); - - ap->pages[page_index] = &tmp_folio->page; + folio_get(folio); + ap->pages[page_index] = &folio->page; ap->descs[page_index].offset = 0; ap->descs[page_index].length = PAGE_SIZE; inc_wb_stat(&inode_to_bdi(inode)->wb, WB_WRITEBACK); - inc_node_page_state(&tmp_folio->page, NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP); + inc_node_page_state(&folio->page, NR_WRITEBACK); } static struct fuse_writepage_args *fuse_writepage_args_setup(struct folio *folio, @@ -2121,18 +1977,12 @@ static int fuse_writepage_locked(struct folio *folio) struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode); struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa; struct fuse_args_pages *ap; - struct folio *tmp_folio; struct fuse_file *ff; - int error = -ENOMEM; - - tmp_folio = folio_alloc(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0); - if (!tmp_folio) - goto err; + int error = -EIO; - error = -EIO; ff = fuse_write_file_get(fi); if (!ff) - goto err_nofile; + goto err; wpa = fuse_writepage_args_setup(folio, ff); error = -ENOMEM; @@ -2143,22 +1993,17 @@ static int fuse_writepage_locked(struct folio *folio) ap->num_pages = 1; folio_start_writeback(folio); - fuse_writepage_args_page_fill(wpa, folio, tmp_folio, 0); + fuse_writepage_args_page_fill(wpa, folio, 0); spin_lock(&fi->lock); - tree_insert(&fi->writepages, wpa); list_add_tail(&wpa->queue_entry, &fi->queued_writes); fuse_flush_writepages(inode); spin_unlock(&fi->lock); - folio_end_writeback(folio); - return 0; err_writepage_args: fuse_file_put(ff, false); -err_nofile: - folio_put(tmp_folio); err: mapping_set_error(folio->mapping, error); return error; @@ -2168,7 +2013,6 @@ struct fuse_fill_wb_data { struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa; struct fuse_file *ff; struct inode *inode; - struct page **orig_pages; unsigned int max_pages; }; @@ -2203,68 +2047,11 @@ static void fuse_writepages_send(struct fuse_fill_wb_data *data) struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa = data->wpa; struct inode *inode = data->inode; struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode); - int num_pages = wpa->ia.ap.num_pages; - int i; spin_lock(&fi->lock); list_add_tail(&wpa->queue_entry, &fi->queued_writes); fuse_flush_writepages(inode); spin_unlock(&fi->lock); - - for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) - end_page_writeback(data->orig_pages[i]); -} - -/* - * Check under fi->lock if the page is under writeback, and insert it onto the - * rb_tree if not. Otherwise iterate auxiliary write requests, to see if there's - * one already added for a page at this offset. If there's none, then insert - * this new request onto the auxiliary list, otherwise reuse the existing one by - * swapping the new temp page with the old one. - */ -static bool fuse_writepage_add(struct fuse_writepage_args *new_wpa, - struct page *page) -{ - struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(new_wpa->inode); - struct fuse_writepage_args *tmp; - struct fuse_writepage_args *old_wpa; - struct fuse_args_pages *new_ap = &new_wpa->ia.ap; - - WARN_ON(new_ap->num_pages != 0); - new_ap->num_pages = 1; - - spin_lock(&fi->lock); - old_wpa = fuse_insert_writeback(&fi->writepages, new_wpa); - if (!old_wpa) { - spin_unlock(&fi->lock); - return true; - } - - for (tmp = old_wpa->next; tmp; tmp = tmp->next) { - pgoff_t curr_index; - - WARN_ON(tmp->inode != new_wpa->inode); - curr_index = tmp->ia.write.in.offset >> PAGE_SHIFT; - if (curr_index == page->index) { - WARN_ON(tmp->ia.ap.num_pages != 1); - swap(tmp->ia.ap.pages[0], new_ap->pages[0]); - break; - } - } - - if (!tmp) { - new_wpa->next = old_wpa->next; - old_wpa->next = new_wpa; - } - - spin_unlock(&fi->lock); - - if (tmp) { - fuse_writepage_finish_stat(new_wpa->inode, new_ap->pages[0]); - fuse_writepage_free(new_wpa); - } - - return false; } static bool fuse_writepage_need_send(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct page *page, @@ -2273,15 +2060,6 @@ static bool fuse_writepage_need_send(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct page *page, { WARN_ON(!ap->num_pages); - /* - * Being under writeback is unlikely but possible. For example direct - * read to an mmaped fuse file will set the page dirty twice; once when - * the pages are faulted with get_user_pages(), and then after the read - * completed. - */ - if (fuse_page_is_writeback(data->inode, page->index)) - return true; - /* Reached max pages */ if (ap->num_pages == fc->max_pages) return true; @@ -2291,7 +2069,7 @@ static bool fuse_writepage_need_send(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct page *page, return true; /* Discontinuity */ - if (data->orig_pages[ap->num_pages - 1]->index + 1 != page->index) + if (ap->pages[ap->num_pages - 1]->index + 1 != page->index) return true; /* Need to grow the pages array? If so, did the expansion fail? */ @@ -2308,9 +2086,7 @@ static int fuse_writepages_fill(struct folio *folio, struct fuse_writepage_args *wpa = data->wpa; struct fuse_args_pages *ap = &wpa->ia.ap; struct inode *inode = data->inode; - struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode); struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode); - struct folio *tmp_folio; int err; if (wpa && fuse_writepage_need_send(fc, &folio->page, ap, data)) { @@ -2318,54 +2094,23 @@ static int fuse_writepages_fill(struct folio *folio, data->wpa = NULL; } - err = -ENOMEM; - tmp_folio = folio_alloc(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0); - if (!tmp_folio) - goto out_unlock; - - /* - * The page must not be redirtied until the writeout is completed - * (i.e. userspace has sent a reply to the write request). Otherwise - * there could be more than one temporary page instance for each real - * page. - * - * This is ensured by holding the page lock in page_mkwrite() while - * checking fuse_page_is_writeback(). We already hold the page lock - * since clear_page_dirty_for_io() and keep it held until we add the - * request to the fi->writepages list and increment ap->num_pages. - * After this fuse_page_is_writeback() will indicate that the page is - * under writeback, so we can release the page lock. - */ if (data->wpa == NULL) { err = -ENOMEM; wpa = fuse_writepage_args_setup(folio, data->ff); - if (!wpa) { - folio_put(tmp_folio); + if (!wpa) goto out_unlock; - } fuse_file_get(wpa->ia.ff); data->max_pages = 1; ap = &wpa->ia.ap; } folio_start_writeback(folio); - fuse_writepage_args_page_fill(wpa, folio, tmp_folio, ap->num_pages); - data->orig_pages[ap->num_pages] = &folio->page; + fuse_writepage_args_page_fill(wpa, folio, ap->num_pages); err = 0; - if (data->wpa) { - /* - * Protected by fi->lock against concurrent access by - * fuse_page_is_writeback(). - */ - spin_lock(&fi->lock); - ap->num_pages++; - spin_unlock(&fi->lock); - } else if (fuse_writepage_add(wpa, &folio->page)) { + ap->num_pages++; + if (!data->wpa) data->wpa = wpa; - } else { - folio_end_writeback(folio); - } out_unlock: folio_unlock(folio); @@ -2394,21 +2139,12 @@ static int fuse_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, if (!data.ff) return -EIO; - err = -ENOMEM; - data.orig_pages = kcalloc(fc->max_pages, - sizeof(struct page *), - GFP_NOFS); - if (!data.orig_pages) - goto out; - err = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, fuse_writepages_fill, &data); if (data.wpa) { WARN_ON(!data.wpa->ia.ap.num_pages); fuse_writepages_send(&data); } - kfree(data.orig_pages); -out: fuse_file_put(data.ff, false); return err; } @@ -2433,7 +2169,7 @@ static int fuse_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, if (IS_ERR(folio)) goto error; - fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(mapping->host, folio->index); + folio_wait_writeback(folio); if (folio_test_uptodate(folio) || len >= folio_size(folio)) goto success; @@ -2497,13 +2233,11 @@ static int fuse_launder_folio(struct folio *folio) { int err = 0; if (folio_clear_dirty_for_io(folio)) { - struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host; - /* Serialize with pending writeback for the same page */ - fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, folio->index); + folio_wait_writeback(folio); err = fuse_writepage_locked(folio); if (!err) - fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, folio->index); + folio_wait_writeback(folio); } return err; } @@ -2547,7 +2281,7 @@ static vm_fault_t fuse_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf) return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE; } - fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(inode, page->index); + folio_wait_writeback(page_folio(page)); return VM_FAULT_LOCKED; } @@ -3368,6 +3102,7 @@ void fuse_init_file_inode(struct inode *inode, unsigned int flags) inode->i_fop = &fuse_file_operations; inode->i_data.a_ops = &fuse_file_aops; + mapping_set_no_writeback_reclaim(&inode->i_data); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->write_files); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->queued_writes); @@ -3375,7 +3110,6 @@ void fuse_init_file_inode(struct inode *inode, unsigned int flags) fi->iocachectr = 0; init_waitqueue_head(&fi->page_waitq); init_waitqueue_head(&fi->direct_io_waitq); - fi->writepages = RB_ROOT; if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUSE_DAX)) fuse_dax_inode_init(inode, flags);