From patchwork Fri Oct 18 20:22:51 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jiri Olsa X-Patchwork-Id: 13842329 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3711120513E; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729282992; cv=none; b=jCGvEyTq5TCx8ghhZFUCX0CvP/9wvMTnqNRigrPR5U6EklTJCz+tyjB/EeH3NqzAoUmsPVIv421iE6jDDyxvTkcFIJuMfprgHd7WhLEllW/+6FG9cGBAVByXi3nnqq3MDWCFVSlT4iBfwqc42K7LTyAEn/IvqzjExNbu+4iLESY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729282992; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lyivNG7QkcWF//27U5OwYwaUvTLVf7GexR1n3yjWShI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=YaADgW1TJ0zvU4rOvmGrZk+JGaEgdJvsF6sGYkwuD+4pfSn/1LC7y1GrY7Nv2421drXc4A83noytlt5rxAAAdWVI6QVE+Td/9QQI3cRMvfgv/4Vy0/PjyropZTo4B8yYhob92k/cbgNovDnAy9FQUAn13TkxEGFEBrUFU5VhV4I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VKH8oD7e; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VKH8oD7e" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91238C4CEC3; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:23:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729282991; bh=lyivNG7QkcWF//27U5OwYwaUvTLVf7GexR1n3yjWShI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VKH8oD7eH2raB7qgZmGvf9AG8Pb7la+dBmXIfHzdvx9WWWglEsogPPE16o8ll2NFE Y0LtwUjl+DBpXN68xNgn+I9Mr0pbuHz1yBs7DNfS1eqCKbfAZ76bnjSnWKBpxU136e IOD2QlOvn+5YL1+gUKnw+IfA8Eqq5wC/fC4e/ajmgS9P5HUnFaYfGpv8XtG2+CE2Qp GaqaR6be1Gg/XA3gL7RXRKl841FV5ps17C9/Lk3W1lj9Emh4HLNecnv9l7h99p706s 4JFrXRfAoL3CCg9Q3IGeIdO/bY8wfS5YoW8Uy7HRrNIU76sYiWrbZYCyIs32wUc66/ RmVIYF8VPBqGw== From: Jiri Olsa To: Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCHv8 perf/core 1/2] uprobe: Add data pointer to consumer handlers Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 22:22:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20241018202252.693462-2-jolsa@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.2 In-Reply-To: <20241018202252.693462-1-jolsa@kernel.org> References: <20241018202252.693462-1-jolsa@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Adding data pointer to both entry and exit consumer handlers and all its users. The functionality itself is coming in following change. Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa --- include/linux/uprobes.h | 4 ++-- kernel/events/uprobes.c | 4 ++-- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 6 ++++-- kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 12 ++++++++---- .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h index 2b294bf1881f..bb265a632b91 100644 --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h @@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ struct uprobe_consumer { * for the current process. If filter() is omitted or returns true, * UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE is effectively ignored. */ - int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs); + int (*handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct pt_regs *regs, __u64 *data); int (*ret_handler)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, unsigned long func, - struct pt_regs *regs); + struct pt_regs *regs, __u64 *data); bool (*filter)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct mm_struct *mm); struct list_head cons_node; diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c index 2a0059464383..6b44c386a5df 100644 --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c @@ -2090,7 +2090,7 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) int rc = 0; if (uc->handler) { - rc = uc->handler(uc, regs); + rc = uc->handler(uc, regs, NULL); WARN(rc & ~UPROBE_HANDLER_MASK, "bad rc=0x%x from %ps()\n", rc, uc->handler); } @@ -2128,7 +2128,7 @@ handle_uretprobe_chain(struct return_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs) rcu_read_lock_trace(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()) { if (uc->ret_handler) - uc->ret_handler(uc, ri->func, regs); + uc->ret_handler(uc, ri->func, regs, NULL); } rcu_read_unlock_trace(); } diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index a582cd25ca87..fdab7ecd8dfa 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -3244,7 +3244,8 @@ uprobe_multi_link_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct mm_struct *mm) } static int -uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs) +uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs, + __u64 *data) { struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe; @@ -3253,7 +3254,8 @@ uprobe_multi_link_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs) } static int -uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs) +uprobe_multi_link_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *con, unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs, + __u64 *data) { struct bpf_uprobe *uprobe; diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c index c40531d2cbad..5895eabe3581 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c @@ -89,9 +89,11 @@ static struct trace_uprobe *to_trace_uprobe(struct dyn_event *ev) static int register_uprobe_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu); static int unregister_uprobe_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu); -static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs); +static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs, + __u64 *data); static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, - unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs); + unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs, + __u64 *data); #ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP static unsigned long adjust_stack_addr(unsigned long addr, unsigned int n) @@ -1517,7 +1519,8 @@ trace_uprobe_register(struct trace_event_call *event, enum trace_reg type, } } -static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs) +static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs, + __u64 *data) { struct trace_uprobe *tu; struct uprobe_dispatch_data udd; @@ -1548,7 +1551,8 @@ static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs) } static int uretprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, - unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs) + unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs, + __u64 *data) { struct trace_uprobe *tu; struct uprobe_dispatch_data udd; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 8835761d9a12..12005e3dc3e4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file __ro_after_init = { static int uprobe_ret_handler(struct uprobe_consumer *self, unsigned long func, - struct pt_regs *regs) + struct pt_regs *regs, __u64 *data) { regs->ax = 0x12345678deadbeef; From patchwork Fri Oct 18 20:22:52 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jiri Olsa X-Patchwork-Id: 13842330 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF74B20513E; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729283009; cv=none; b=vD8QFLGiSqxGlt5KLjwQS7wr57dG6AzHbzEftzmOGc9S2+MpwMOldST5VOg1GsQEnPwQfoKEUpEYrbDQxvEyVC5Ie1HjqiOEytYInM8SW6nes0ALXVte0dFxmPA1S68s73ATP695MbtSbefeFpsNqIf2lEuPxbaocWxnEQOLwyw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729283009; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2r4Z7WDoBqjbZI4hXz3ZPK1ZfMY9qBJgCipHO+zEPEo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=ObtttVbjOy+VEMxcP4SLGfJ8VbbYlMwYxanoQ6YFnT/fEQXqOFhNZWS//kVXPlaEwGXXVppyEzNKyEyKYCYoKzrsmPJymm0N1hznGfY4HggN3pFjYmEOU9D/Pfq+38PBrquU3LUxp5hEEp3WMOGQlGEi+JCK3ow2SKZUqTVn1Q0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IOy4Ddgk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IOy4Ddgk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52FE9C4CEC3; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 20:23:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729283008; bh=2r4Z7WDoBqjbZI4hXz3ZPK1ZfMY9qBJgCipHO+zEPEo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IOy4Ddgk0PHjaAqU4H59FafFJCBMlXMO2DBYFefJGDHQT2vMyji5sQASM2Hnlit7q qsTzngpq1J7AOX53e5H4Pc3Y1+VTZ9PTN2XBc+9epmtbwfC8lQM+oAbrIivHG9VkTr E2GrkJMe2bz2fAdvKHhQNgoOKodeuTFaPQM/7DJ3xYMI8hAhknR3toYABUEmSMMaKz IOfVEP6gK5jinLjzPmJtViV0hhuM32fBb/Z9KYc/Cgb7kdn9t7uOVEE2giJtIJXWgy RyydwSuieecYWVWqlOj5X+lIfcSc1sWUQt9Ji+YhOvISzlGx2aXjaJ01pBHllSo8iB duRyRiUNBnKow== From: Jiri Olsa To: Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCHv8 perf/core 2/2] uprobe: Add support for session consumer Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 22:22:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20241018202252.693462-3-jolsa@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.2 In-Reply-To: <20241018202252.693462-1-jolsa@kernel.org> References: <20241018202252.693462-1-jolsa@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 This change allows the uprobe consumer to behave as session which means that 'handler' and 'ret_handler' callbacks are connected in a way that allows to: - control execution of 'ret_handler' from 'handler' callback - share data between 'handler' and 'ret_handler' callbacks The session concept fits to our common use case where we do filtering on entry uprobe and based on the result we decide to run the return uprobe (or not). It's also convenient to share the data between session callbacks. To achive this we are adding new return value the uprobe consumer can return from 'handler' callback: UPROBE_HANDLER_IGNORE - Ignore 'ret_handler' callback for this consumer. And store cookie and pass it to 'ret_handler' when consumer has both 'handler' and 'ret_handler' callbacks defined. We store shared data in the return_consumer object array as part of the return_instance object. This way the handle_uretprobe_chain can find related return_consumer and its shared data. We also store entry handler return value, for cases when there are multiple consumers on single uprobe and some of them are ignored and some of them not, in which case the return probe gets installed and we need to have a way to find out which consumer needs to be ignored. The tricky part is when consumer is registered 'after' the uprobe entry handler is hit. In such case this consumer's 'ret_handler' gets executed as well, but it won't have the proper data pointer set, so we can filter it out. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa --- include/linux/uprobes.h | 21 +++++- kernel/events/uprobes.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h index bb265a632b91..dbaf04189548 100644 --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h @@ -23,8 +23,17 @@ struct inode; struct notifier_block; struct page; +/* + * Allowed return values from uprobe consumer's handler callback + * with following meaning: + * + * UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE + * - Remove the uprobe breakpoint from current->mm. + * UPROBE_HANDLER_IGNORE + * - Ignore ret_handler callback for this consumer. + */ #define UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE 1 -#define UPROBE_HANDLER_MASK 1 +#define UPROBE_HANDLER_IGNORE 2 #define MAX_URETPROBE_DEPTH 64 @@ -44,6 +53,8 @@ struct uprobe_consumer { bool (*filter)(struct uprobe_consumer *self, struct mm_struct *mm); struct list_head cons_node; + + __u64 id; /* set when uprobe_consumer is registered */ }; #ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES @@ -83,14 +94,22 @@ struct uprobe_task { unsigned int depth; }; +struct return_consumer { + __u64 cookie; + __u64 id; +}; + struct return_instance { struct uprobe *uprobe; unsigned long func; unsigned long stack; /* stack pointer */ unsigned long orig_ret_vaddr; /* original return address */ bool chained; /* true, if instance is nested */ + int consumers_cnt; struct return_instance *next; /* keep as stack */ + + struct return_consumer consumers[] __counted_by(consumers_cnt); }; enum rp_check { diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c index 6b44c386a5df..4ef4b51776eb 100644 --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct uprobe { struct rcu_head rcu; loff_t offset; loff_t ref_ctr_offset; - unsigned long flags; + unsigned long flags; /* "unsigned long" so bitops work */ /* * The generic code assumes that it has two members of unknown type @@ -823,8 +823,11 @@ static struct uprobe *alloc_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, static void consumer_add(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc) { + static atomic64_t id; + down_write(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem); list_add_rcu(&uc->cons_node, &uprobe->consumers); + uc->id = (__u64) atomic64_inc_return(&id); up_write(&uprobe->consumer_rwsem); } @@ -1761,6 +1764,34 @@ static struct uprobe_task *get_utask(void) return current->utask; } +static size_t ri_size(int consumers_cnt) +{ + struct return_instance *ri; + + return sizeof(*ri) + sizeof(ri->consumers[0]) * consumers_cnt; +} + +#define DEF_CNT 4 + +static struct return_instance *alloc_return_instance(void) +{ + struct return_instance *ri; + + ri = kzalloc(ri_size(DEF_CNT), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ri) + return ZERO_SIZE_PTR; + + ri->consumers_cnt = DEF_CNT; + return ri; +} + +static struct return_instance *dup_return_instance(struct return_instance *old) +{ + size_t size = ri_size(old->consumers_cnt); + + return kmemdup(old, size, GFP_KERNEL); +} + static int dup_utask(struct task_struct *t, struct uprobe_task *o_utask) { struct uprobe_task *n_utask; @@ -1773,11 +1804,10 @@ static int dup_utask(struct task_struct *t, struct uprobe_task *o_utask) p = &n_utask->return_instances; for (o = o_utask->return_instances; o; o = o->next) { - n = kmalloc(sizeof(struct return_instance), GFP_KERNEL); + n = dup_return_instance(o); if (!n) return -ENOMEM; - *n = *o; /* * uprobe's refcnt has to be positive at this point, kept by * utask->return_instances items; return_instances can't be @@ -1870,35 +1900,31 @@ static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task *utask, bool chained, utask->return_instances = ri; } -static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) +static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs, + struct return_instance *ri) { struct uprobe_task *utask = current->utask; unsigned long orig_ret_vaddr, trampoline_vaddr; - struct return_instance *ri; bool chained; if (!get_xol_area()) - return; + goto free; if (utask->depth >= MAX_URETPROBE_DEPTH) { printk_ratelimited(KERN_INFO "uprobe: omit uretprobe due to" " nestedness limit pid/tgid=%d/%d\n", current->pid, current->tgid); - return; + goto free; } /* we need to bump refcount to store uprobe in utask */ if (!try_get_uprobe(uprobe)) - return; - - ri = kmalloc(sizeof(struct return_instance), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!ri) - goto fail; + goto free; trampoline_vaddr = uprobe_get_trampoline_vaddr(); orig_ret_vaddr = arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(trampoline_vaddr, regs); if (orig_ret_vaddr == -1) - goto fail; + goto put; /* drop the entries invalidated by longjmp() */ chained = (orig_ret_vaddr == trampoline_vaddr); @@ -1916,7 +1942,7 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) * attack from user-space. */ uprobe_warn(current, "handle tail call"); - goto fail; + goto put; } orig_ret_vaddr = utask->return_instances->orig_ret_vaddr; } @@ -1931,9 +1957,10 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) utask->return_instances = ri; return; -fail: - kfree(ri); +put: put_uprobe(uprobe); +free: + kfree(ri); } /* Prepare to single-step probed instruction out of line. */ @@ -2077,34 +2104,90 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe_rcu(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swb return uprobe; } +static struct return_instance* +push_consumer(struct return_instance *ri, int idx, __u64 id, __u64 cookie) +{ + if (unlikely(ri == ZERO_SIZE_PTR)) + return ri; + + if (unlikely(idx >= ri->consumers_cnt)) { + struct return_instance *old_ri = ri; + + ri->consumers_cnt += DEF_CNT; + ri = krealloc(old_ri, ri_size(old_ri->consumers_cnt), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ri) { + kfree(old_ri); + return ZERO_SIZE_PTR; + } + } + + ri->consumers[idx].id = id; + ri->consumers[idx].cookie = cookie; + return ri; +} + +static struct return_consumer * +return_consumer_find(struct return_instance *ri, int *iter, int id) +{ + struct return_consumer *ric; + int idx = *iter; + + for (ric = &ri->consumers[idx]; idx < ri->consumers_cnt; idx++, ric++) { + if (ric->id == id) { + *iter = idx + 1; + return ric; + } + } + return NULL; +} + +static bool ignore_ret_handler(int rc) +{ + return rc == UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE || rc == UPROBE_HANDLER_IGNORE; +} + static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) { struct uprobe_consumer *uc; - int remove = UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE; - bool need_prep = false; /* prepare return uprobe, when needed */ - bool has_consumers = false; + bool has_consumers = false, remove = true; + struct return_instance *ri = NULL; + int push_idx = 0; current->utask->auprobe = &uprobe->arch; list_for_each_entry_rcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()) { + bool session = uc->handler && uc->ret_handler; + __u64 cookie = 0; int rc = 0; if (uc->handler) { - rc = uc->handler(uc, regs, NULL); - WARN(rc & ~UPROBE_HANDLER_MASK, + rc = uc->handler(uc, regs, &cookie); + WARN(rc < 0 || rc > 2, "bad rc=0x%x from %ps()\n", rc, uc->handler); } - if (uc->ret_handler) - need_prep = true; - - remove &= rc; + remove &= rc == UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE; has_consumers = true; + + if (!uc->ret_handler || ignore_ret_handler(rc)) + continue; + + if (!ri) + ri = alloc_return_instance(); + + if (session) + ri = push_consumer(ri, push_idx++, uc->id, cookie); } current->utask->auprobe = NULL; - if (need_prep && !remove) - prepare_uretprobe(uprobe, regs); /* put bp at return */ + if (!ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(ri)) { + /* + * The push_idx value has the final number of return consumers, + * and ri->consumers_cnt has number of allocated consumers. + */ + ri->consumers_cnt = push_idx; + prepare_uretprobe(uprobe, regs, ri); + } if (remove && has_consumers) { down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem); @@ -2123,12 +2206,19 @@ static void handle_uretprobe_chain(struct return_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs) { struct uprobe *uprobe = ri->uprobe; + struct return_consumer *ric; struct uprobe_consumer *uc; + int ric_idx = 0; rcu_read_lock_trace(); list_for_each_entry_rcu(uc, &uprobe->consumers, cons_node, rcu_read_lock_trace_held()) { - if (uc->ret_handler) - uc->ret_handler(uc, ri->func, regs, NULL); + bool session = uc->handler && uc->ret_handler; + + if (uc->ret_handler) { + ric = return_consumer_find(ri, &ric_idx, uc->id); + if (!session || ric) + uc->ret_handler(uc, ri->func, regs, ric ? &ric->cookie : NULL); + } } rcu_read_unlock_trace(); }