From patchwork Fri Feb 7 07:34:29 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Charles Han X-Patchwork-Id: 13964466 Received: from unicom145.biz-email.net (unicom145.biz-email.net [210.51.26.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FDFA1A2C0B; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 07:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=210.51.26.145 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738913770; cv=none; b=iWrvLgfmCklD69UHfV5cX4SNB56akciEwm/vCEEfWKBlaXXpz+mPU9Lsn+9EAiNYTGQ2UfMHtliIp8YtQR99SePNiNyLLZaWfCspSbfILLZ2M8lCqMm6ZfbecIZx9+/4xIHzEk/LfF5Kw1psLCrQG9Y8VfGNZnlEuYwplzXzfDE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738913770; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KP0xPlJQnncOfGBLdKus6e0ffsRrhdP0K7kpQJEhrmk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EnO9dCmmhiwM167qlyJiz9kUicDTAIl7pobJ4JEX38sdB65W/VYpuXLlq5bm5s/2kbZjlO5hK+3+qM0QyGcVJ5wAW+twYGBcZyQ74MCAo4h+LSeUGulPOiCTR3lrfpv74ETBF8u+oruGKrqavCEtQ4xqLB86Wzw/wOfGUuS1Wlk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inspur.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=inspur.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=210.51.26.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=inspur.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=inspur.com Received: from unicom145.biz-email.net by unicom145.biz-email.net ((D)) with ASMTP (SSL) id EZP00148; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 15:34:48 +0800 Received: from jtjnmail201607.home.langchao.com (10.100.2.7) by jtjnmail201609.home.langchao.com (10.100.2.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:34:47 +0800 Received: from locahost.localdomain (10.94.12.190) by jtjnmail201607.home.langchao.com (10.100.2.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:34:47 +0800 From: Charles Han To: , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , Charles Han Subject: [v2] Documentation: Remove repeated word in docs Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 15:34:29 +0800 Message-ID: <20250207073433.23604-1-hanchunchao@inspur.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: Jtjnmail201617.home.langchao.com (10.100.2.17) To jtjnmail201607.home.langchao.com (10.100.2.7) tUid: 20252071534487ca61296d0d4a6ca2047d9cd90f405c0 X-Abuse-Reports-To: service@corp-email.com Abuse-Reports-To: service@corp-email.com X-Complaints-To: service@corp-email.com X-Report-Abuse-To: service@corp-email.com Remove the repeated word "to" docs. Signed-off-by: Charles Han Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Acked-by: Vincent Mailhol --- .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml | 2 +- Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml index 2a98b26630cb..c155c9c6db39 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/microchip,mcp251xfd.yaml @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ properties: microchip,rx-int-gpios: description: - GPIO phandle of GPIO connected to to INT1 pin of the MCP251XFD, which + GPIO phandle of GPIO connected to INT1 pin of the MCP251XFD, which signals a pending RX interrupt. maxItems: 1 diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst index 12aa63840830..e231d127cd40 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst @@ -4521,8 +4521,8 @@ Both online and offline repair can use this strategy. | For this second effort, the ondisk parent pointer format as originally | | proposed was ``(parent_inum, parent_gen, dirent_pos) → (dirent_name)``. | | The format was changed during development to eliminate the requirement | -| of repair tools needing to to ensure that the ``dirent_pos`` field | -| always matched when reconstructing a directory. | +| of repair tools needing to ensure that the ``dirent_pos`` field always | +| matched when reconstructing a directory. | | | | There were a few other ways to have solved that problem: | | |