From patchwork Wed Feb 26 06:30:11 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yu Kuai X-Patchwork-Id: 13991585 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C5A627455; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 06:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740551664; cv=none; b=EsXFCWRlZJG9RPbn7IzJ23aQtquh9qX13ayRuj71VshXAKNO3lKk4Rt/frgxqpCrmsQe+1skNAeHhHreKyS0BZ/qFh+v0ig0cH0SXuCME8jl4jhT5+MouLrzMnv4K3CkRq77Ilaw70wpzdSD49U6mBKyU4MmhDWHIoxkKWtZB6M= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740551664; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uagHt1edGLsKO/w7E5CpRr6rb9GrmY+1q7+2GhMUNWQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=TBhqqXQAeKiQEy11jn/XGBrkCRKZjabvg+Nky6nz8gbntrdZVuP7ug0IKwfcPqtRJ3wEn6FwUnlo8bkNa0LY8YYwCRwSFV4aI4alAF3FxDx0eGRAUq6IDDsoicewHIc84qe1YAc9y9T1mKtQZkw/PLkrrNUmSjDKhLY4h/CEHXE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Z2l6m5XwCz4f3jrt; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:33:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B6C1A058E; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:34:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgDHKl_ktb5nQ+25Ew--.13735S4; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:34:14 +0800 (CST) From: Yu Kuai To: song@kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH] md/raid1,raid10: don't ignore IO flags Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:30:11 +0800 Message-Id: <20250226063011.968761-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgDHKl_ktb5nQ+25Ew--.13735S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxGr1fZr1kGFyUKFykWw15Arb_yoWrXr48pa 9rtayrurW3Jw4UZr1DXFZruaySgF4qgFW2krW8Ww1fJw1avFyqqa1rJrWrWFn8ZFW3ur17 Xwn5A3yDCr4agFUanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUkC14x267AKxVW8JVW5JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0 rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGwA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK02 1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26w1j6s0DM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4U JVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gc CE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E 2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJV W8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1lc7CjxVAaw2AFwI0_ JF0_Jw1l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67 AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIY rxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14 v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8 JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUYCJmUU UUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ From: Yu Kuai If blk-wbt is enabled by default, it's found that raid write performance is quite bad because all IO are throttled by wbt of underlying disks, due to flag REQ_IDLE is ignored. And turns out this behaviour exist since blk-wbt is introduced. Other than REQ_IDLE, other flags should not be ignored as well, for example REQ_META can be set for filesystems, clear it can cause priority reverse problems; And REQ_NOWAIT should not be cleared as well, because io will wait instead of fail directly in underlying disks. Fix those problems by keeping IO flags from master bio. Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai --- drivers/md/raid1.c | 5 ----- drivers/md/raid10.c | 8 -------- 2 files changed, 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c index a87eb9a3b016..347de0e36d59 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c @@ -1316,8 +1316,6 @@ static void raid1_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio, struct r1conf *conf = mddev->private; struct raid1_info *mirror; struct bio *read_bio; - const enum req_op op = bio_op(bio); - const blk_opf_t do_sync = bio->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC; int max_sectors; int rdisk, error; bool r1bio_existed = !!r1_bio; @@ -1405,7 +1403,6 @@ static void raid1_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio, read_bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = r1_bio->sector + mirror->rdev->data_offset; read_bio->bi_end_io = raid1_end_read_request; - read_bio->bi_opf = op | do_sync; if (test_bit(FailFast, &mirror->rdev->flags) && test_bit(R1BIO_FailFast, &r1_bio->state)) read_bio->bi_opf |= MD_FAILFAST; @@ -1654,8 +1651,6 @@ static void raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio, mbio->bi_iter.bi_sector = (r1_bio->sector + rdev->data_offset); mbio->bi_end_io = raid1_end_write_request; - mbio->bi_opf = bio_op(bio) | - (bio->bi_opf & (REQ_SYNC | REQ_FUA | REQ_ATOMIC)); if (test_bit(FailFast, &rdev->flags) && !test_bit(WriteMostly, &rdev->flags) && conf->raid_disks - mddev->degraded > 1) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c index efe93b979167..e294ba00ea0e 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -1146,8 +1146,6 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio, { struct r10conf *conf = mddev->private; struct bio *read_bio; - const enum req_op op = bio_op(bio); - const blk_opf_t do_sync = bio->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC; int max_sectors; struct md_rdev *rdev; char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE]; @@ -1228,7 +1226,6 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio, read_bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = r10_bio->devs[slot].addr + choose_data_offset(r10_bio, rdev); read_bio->bi_end_io = raid10_end_read_request; - read_bio->bi_opf = op | do_sync; if (test_bit(FailFast, &rdev->flags) && test_bit(R10BIO_FailFast, &r10_bio->state)) read_bio->bi_opf |= MD_FAILFAST; @@ -1247,10 +1244,6 @@ static void raid10_write_one_disk(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio, struct bio *bio, bool replacement, int n_copy) { - const enum req_op op = bio_op(bio); - const blk_opf_t do_sync = bio->bi_opf & REQ_SYNC; - const blk_opf_t do_fua = bio->bi_opf & REQ_FUA; - const blk_opf_t do_atomic = bio->bi_opf & REQ_ATOMIC; unsigned long flags; struct r10conf *conf = mddev->private; struct md_rdev *rdev; @@ -1269,7 +1262,6 @@ static void raid10_write_one_disk(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio, mbio->bi_iter.bi_sector = (r10_bio->devs[n_copy].addr + choose_data_offset(r10_bio, rdev)); mbio->bi_end_io = raid10_end_write_request; - mbio->bi_opf = op | do_sync | do_fua | do_atomic; if (!replacement && test_bit(FailFast, &conf->mirrors[devnum].rdev->flags) && enough(conf, devnum))